Stunting Reversal versus Regression to the Mean in Epidemiological Studies of Child Linear Growth in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

IF 12.7 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Advances in Nutrition Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-20 DOI:10.1016/j.advnut.2026.100688
Daniel E Roth, Kelly M Watson, Huma Qamar, Diego G Bassani
{"title":"Stunting Reversal versus Regression to the Mean in Epidemiological Studies of Child Linear Growth in Low- and Middle-Income Countries","authors":"Daniel E Roth,&nbsp;Kelly M Watson,&nbsp;Huma Qamar,&nbsp;Diego G Bassani","doi":"10.1016/j.advnut.2026.100688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Early childhood undernutrition in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is marked by population-wide linear growth faltering, whereby most children grow in height more slowly than expected for their age and a relatively high proportion of children are classified as stunted based on a height-for-age <em>z</em>-score (HAZ) below −2. In epidemiological studies in LMICs, patterns of linear growth are often examined by longitudinal analyses of individual children’s HAZ trajectories by age; in some studies, catch-up growth is defined as an upward HAZ threshold-crossing event such as recovery from stunting or stunting reversal (i.e., crossing from below to above HAZ = −2). In this Perspective, we question the suitability of this method of studying catch-up growth and highlight its susceptibility to regression to the mean (RTM), a statistical phenomenon whereby individuals with extreme values tend to move closer to the population mean at subsequent measurement timepoints. We use simulations of anthropometric datasets to demonstrate that upward HAZ threshold-crossing events (e.g., stunting reversal) are caused by RTM, and we discuss the advantages and pitfalls of other statistical methods to address RTM. In a scoping review of epidemiological studies of linear growth catch-up in LMICs (2004 to mid-2024; <em>N</em> = 69), we found that RTM was uncommonly mentioned (20%), and few studies (5/69; 7%) explicitly addressed RTM. In most studies (36/69; 52%), inferences about catch-up were based on methods that are at higher risk of RTM artifacts, namely by quantifying threshold-crossing events (<em>n</em> = 24) or by stratification of the sample by baseline size (<em>n</em> = 12). We conclude that more attention to RTM is needed in analyses of linear catch-up growth in LMICs. Published studies that used RTM artifact-prone measures should be remediated, and the use of HAZ threshold-crossing events such as stunting reversal should be avoided in future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7349,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Nutrition","volume":"17 8","pages":"Article 100688"},"PeriodicalIF":12.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S216183132600102X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early childhood undernutrition in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is marked by population-wide linear growth faltering, whereby most children grow in height more slowly than expected for their age and a relatively high proportion of children are classified as stunted based on a height-for-age z-score (HAZ) below −2. In epidemiological studies in LMICs, patterns of linear growth are often examined by longitudinal analyses of individual children’s HAZ trajectories by age; in some studies, catch-up growth is defined as an upward HAZ threshold-crossing event such as recovery from stunting or stunting reversal (i.e., crossing from below to above HAZ = −2). In this Perspective, we question the suitability of this method of studying catch-up growth and highlight its susceptibility to regression to the mean (RTM), a statistical phenomenon whereby individuals with extreme values tend to move closer to the population mean at subsequent measurement timepoints. We use simulations of anthropometric datasets to demonstrate that upward HAZ threshold-crossing events (e.g., stunting reversal) are caused by RTM, and we discuss the advantages and pitfalls of other statistical methods to address RTM. In a scoping review of epidemiological studies of linear growth catch-up in LMICs (2004 to mid-2024; N = 69), we found that RTM was uncommonly mentioned (20%), and few studies (5/69; 7%) explicitly addressed RTM. In most studies (36/69; 52%), inferences about catch-up were based on methods that are at higher risk of RTM artifacts, namely by quantifying threshold-crossing events (n = 24) or by stratification of the sample by baseline size (n = 12). We conclude that more attention to RTM is needed in analyses of linear catch-up growth in LMICs. Published studies that used RTM artifact-prone measures should be remediated, and the use of HAZ threshold-crossing events such as stunting reversal should be avoided in future research.
在低收入和中等收入国家儿童线性生长的流行病学研究中,发育迟缓逆转与回归均值。
在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),早期儿童营养不良的特点是全国人口的线性增长停滞不前,大多数儿童的身高增长速度低于其年龄的预期,根据年龄身高z-score (HAZ)低于-2,相对较高比例的儿童被归类为发育迟缓。在低收入和中等收入国家的流行病学研究中,线性增长模式通常通过按年龄对个别儿童HAZ轨迹进行纵向分析来检验;在一些研究中,追赶型生长被定义为向上的HAZ阈值跨越事件,如从发育不良中恢复或发育不良逆转(即从HAZ=-2以下越过HAZ=-2以上)。在这个观点中,我们质疑这种研究赶超增长方法的适用性,并强调其对回归均值(RTM)的敏感性,这是一种统计现象,即具有极端值的个体倾向于在随后的测量时间点更接近总体均值。我们使用人体测量数据集的模拟来证明向上的HAZ阈值交叉事件(例如,发育不良逆转)是由RTM引起的;并且,我们讨论了其他统计方法来解决RTM的优点和缺陷。在对中低收入国家线性增长追赶的流行病学研究(2004年至2024年中期;N=69)的范围回顾中,我们发现RTM很少被提及(20%),很少有研究(5/69;7%)明确提到RTM。在大多数研究中(36/69;52%),关于追赶的推断是基于具有较高RTM伪象风险的方法,即通过量化阈值交叉事件(n=24)或根据基线大小对样本进行分层(n=12)。我们的结论是,在分析中低收入国家的线性追赶增长时,需要更多地关注RTM。已发表的研究中使用了容易产生RTM伪影的措施,应该加以纠正,并且在未来的研究中应该避免使用HAZ阈值交叉事件,如发育不良逆转。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Nutrition
Advances in Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
2.20%
发文量
117
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Advances in Nutrition (AN/Adv Nutr) publishes focused reviews on pivotal findings and recent research across all domains relevant to nutritional scientists and biomedical researchers. This encompasses nutrition-related research spanning biochemical, molecular, and genetic studies using experimental animal models, domestic animals, and human subjects. The journal also emphasizes clinical nutrition, epidemiology and public health, and nutrition education. Review articles concentrate on recent progress rather than broad historical developments. In addition to review articles, AN includes Perspectives, Letters to the Editor, and supplements. Supplement proposals require pre-approval by the editor before submission. The journal features reports and position papers from the American Society for Nutrition, summaries of major government and foundation reports, and Nutrient Information briefs providing crucial details about dietary requirements, food sources, deficiencies, and other essential nutrient information. All submissions with scientific content undergo peer review by the Editors or their designees prior to acceptance for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书