{"title":"Sports Science and Gifted Education: Similarities and Differences","authors":"Jae Yup Jung, Adrian W. Chew","doi":"10.1177/00169862261448208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, a systematic review was undertaken of the international research literature on the conceptualization, modeling, identification, development, and support of high ability and achievement in sports. For this purpose, four search criteria (i.e., relevance to high ability/achievement, an empirical study, a journal article published in a reputable outlet, and an English language publication) were applied to two databases—SPORTDiscus with Full Text (EBSCO) and Web of Science Core Collection. The 44 studies that met the search criteria were thematically analyzed. Thereafter, a comparison was made of key similarities and differences between the fields of sports science and gifted education in their approach to high ability/achievement, before a set of recommendations for future research and practice in gifted education were proposed (e.g., the adoption of holistic, dynamic and long-term focused models, broader and deeper approaches to identification, the establishment of optimal talent development environments, and technology-enhanced identification and support).","PeriodicalId":47514,"journal":{"name":"Gifted Child Quarterly","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gifted Child Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862261448208","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this study, a systematic review was undertaken of the international research literature on the conceptualization, modeling, identification, development, and support of high ability and achievement in sports. For this purpose, four search criteria (i.e., relevance to high ability/achievement, an empirical study, a journal article published in a reputable outlet, and an English language publication) were applied to two databases—SPORTDiscus with Full Text (EBSCO) and Web of Science Core Collection. The 44 studies that met the search criteria were thematically analyzed. Thereafter, a comparison was made of key similarities and differences between the fields of sports science and gifted education in their approach to high ability/achievement, before a set of recommendations for future research and practice in gifted education were proposed (e.g., the adoption of holistic, dynamic and long-term focused models, broader and deeper approaches to identification, the establishment of optimal talent development environments, and technology-enhanced identification and support).
在本研究中,系统回顾了国际上关于体育运动中高能力和成就的概念、建模、识别、发展和支持的研究文献。为此,我们对两个数据库(sportdiscus with Full Text (EBSCO)和Web of Science Core Collection)应用了四个搜索标准(即与高能力/成就相关、实证研究、发表在知名期刊上的文章和英文出版物)。对符合检索标准的44项研究进行了主题分析。在此基础上,比较了体育科学与资优教育在高能力/成就研究方法上的主要异同,并对资优教育的未来研究和实践提出了一系列建议(如采用整体、动态和长期关注的模型,采用更广泛和更深入的识别方法,建立最优人才发展环境,以及技术增强的识别和支持)。
期刊介绍:
Gifted Child Quarterly (GCQ) is the official journal of the National Association for Gifted Children. As a leading journal in the field, GCQ publishes original scholarly reviews of the literature and quantitative or qualitative research studies. GCQ welcomes manuscripts offering new or creative insights about giftedness and talent development in the context of the school, the home, and the wider society. Manuscripts that explore policy and policy implications are also welcome. Additionally, GCQ reviews selected books relevant to the field, with an emphasis on scholarly texts or text with policy implications, and publishes reviews, essay reviews, and critiques.