Cropland edge management enhances the adaptability of cropland productivity to extremely dry events

IF 24.7 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Wanying Liu, Jiakun Duan, Xinru Min, Liang Dong, Xiaoling Zhang
{"title":"Cropland edge management enhances the adaptability of cropland productivity to extremely dry events","authors":"Wanying Liu, Jiakun Duan, Xinru Min, Liang Dong, Xiaoling Zhang","doi":"10.1038/s43016-026-01366-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rapid urbanization is fragmenting periurban cropland landscapes, increasing anthropogenic disturbance at cropland edges and heightening productivity sensitivity to climate extremes. Yet how micro-scale cropland edge interactions shape productivity adaptation to hydrological extremes remains unclear. By combining high-resolution modelling with a vulnerability–resilience assessment, we found that micro-scale cropland edge interactions are critical mediators amplifying the impacts of climate on productivity. A one-standard-deviation increase in cropland edge ratio increased log-transformed vulnerability to extremely dry events by 0.981 standard deviations, whereas a one-standard-deviation increase in ecological buffer zone ratio enhanced log-transformed resilience by 3.165 standard deviations. Counterfactual simulations identified two adaptation pathways: reducing cropland edge ratio and expanding ecological buffer zones. Across Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and Representative Concentration Pathways (SSP–RCP) scenarios, the Edge-Reduction strategy consistently decreased cropland edge exposure by nearly 36%, while the Buffer-Zone strategy expanded ecological buffer zones around cropland by 12–15% from 2020 to 2060. Our analysis underscores the role of cropland edge ratio in amplifying risks to cropland productivity during extremely dry events and provides a mechanistic framework for adaptive land management. Climate change and rapid urbanization are fragmenting periurban cropland, increasing edge disturbance and vulnerability to hydrological extremes. This study shows that cropland edge reduction and ecological buffer expansion can reduce productivity loss and improve resilience to future drought risk.","PeriodicalId":94151,"journal":{"name":"Nature food","volume":"7 6","pages":"589-600"},"PeriodicalIF":24.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature food","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-026-01366-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid urbanization is fragmenting periurban cropland landscapes, increasing anthropogenic disturbance at cropland edges and heightening productivity sensitivity to climate extremes. Yet how micro-scale cropland edge interactions shape productivity adaptation to hydrological extremes remains unclear. By combining high-resolution modelling with a vulnerability–resilience assessment, we found that micro-scale cropland edge interactions are critical mediators amplifying the impacts of climate on productivity. A one-standard-deviation increase in cropland edge ratio increased log-transformed vulnerability to extremely dry events by 0.981 standard deviations, whereas a one-standard-deviation increase in ecological buffer zone ratio enhanced log-transformed resilience by 3.165 standard deviations. Counterfactual simulations identified two adaptation pathways: reducing cropland edge ratio and expanding ecological buffer zones. Across Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and Representative Concentration Pathways (SSP–RCP) scenarios, the Edge-Reduction strategy consistently decreased cropland edge exposure by nearly 36%, while the Buffer-Zone strategy expanded ecological buffer zones around cropland by 12–15% from 2020 to 2060. Our analysis underscores the role of cropland edge ratio in amplifying risks to cropland productivity during extremely dry events and provides a mechanistic framework for adaptive land management. Climate change and rapid urbanization are fragmenting periurban cropland, increasing edge disturbance and vulnerability to hydrological extremes. This study shows that cropland edge reduction and ecological buffer expansion can reduce productivity loss and improve resilience to future drought risk.

Abstract Image

农田边缘管理提高了农田生产力对极端干旱事件的适应性。
快速城市化使城郊农田景观破碎化,加剧了农田边缘的人为干扰,提高了生产力对极端气候的敏感性。然而,微观尺度的农田边缘相互作用如何影响生产力对极端水文的适应尚不清楚。通过将高分辨率模型与脆弱性-恢复力评估相结合,我们发现微尺度农田边缘相互作用是放大气候对生产力影响的关键中介。农田边缘比增加1个标准差,对极端干旱事件的对数转换脆弱性增加0.981个标准差,生态缓冲区比增加1个标准差,对数转换恢复力增加3.165个标准差。反事实模拟确定了降低耕地边缘比和扩大生态缓冲区两种适应路径。在共享社会经济路径和代表性集中路径(SSP-RCP)情景下,边缘减少策略持续减少农田边缘暴露近36%,而缓冲区策略从2020年到2060年将农田周围的生态缓冲区扩大了12-15%。我们的分析强调了在极端干旱事件中,耕地边缘比在放大耕地生产力风险方面的作用,并为适应性土地管理提供了一个机制框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
28.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书