Lucas Di Meglio, Anas Halioua, Rachel Sossa, Fanny Timera, Estelle Dubus, Peggy Reiner, Eric Jouvent, Mikael Mazighi
{"title":"Technology-Assisted Training for Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral IV Access by Nurses: A Randomized Educational Study.","authors":"Lucas Di Meglio, Anas Halioua, Rachel Sossa, Fanny Timera, Estelle Dubus, Peggy Reiner, Eric Jouvent, Mikael Mazighi","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheter (PVC) placement is increasingly performed by nurses and requires the acquisition of complex visuomotor and cognitive skills. Technology-enhanced guidance tools have been developed to facilitate learning, yet their educational benefit when added to existing training curricula remains uncertain, particularly in paramedical populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center, randomized educational study comparing standard training with technology-assisted training for ultrasound-guided PVC placement among nurses. Twenty nurses were randomized to a control group (standard training; n=11) or an intervention group (standard training plus use of an ultrasound guidance/visualization device; n=9). All participants received identical theoretical instruction and mannequin-based practice. Within 3 months, each nurse performed 10 consecutive ultrasound-guided PVC placements in clinical settings. In the intervention group, the first 5 procedures were performed with device support and the last 5 without to assess skill transfer. The primary outcome was procedural success rate. Secondary outcomes included procedure time, number of attempts among successful procedures, and self-perceived mastery. Analyses were conducted at the attempt level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 200 clinical procedures were analyzed (110 control, 90 intervention). The overall success rate was 78.0%, with no statistically significant difference detected between the control and intervention groups (76.4% vs. 80.0%, P=0.656). Procedures in the intervention group were associated with longer completion times compared with the control group (12.64 vs. 11.25 min, P=0.009). Learning curve analyses showed numerical improvements in procedure time over successive attempts in both groups, but no statistically significant acceleration of learning was detected in the intervention group. Self-perceived mastery did not differ between groups and remained stable over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this pragmatic exploratory educational setting, integrating an ultrasound guidance/visualization device into an existing nurse training curriculum was not associated with improved procedural success or faster learning and was associated with longer procedure times. These findings suggest that the educational impact of technology-enhanced training depends less on technology alone than on its curricular integration and support for skill transfer.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000949","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheter (PVC) placement is increasingly performed by nurses and requires the acquisition of complex visuomotor and cognitive skills. Technology-enhanced guidance tools have been developed to facilitate learning, yet their educational benefit when added to existing training curricula remains uncertain, particularly in paramedical populations.
Methods: We conducted a single-center, randomized educational study comparing standard training with technology-assisted training for ultrasound-guided PVC placement among nurses. Twenty nurses were randomized to a control group (standard training; n=11) or an intervention group (standard training plus use of an ultrasound guidance/visualization device; n=9). All participants received identical theoretical instruction and mannequin-based practice. Within 3 months, each nurse performed 10 consecutive ultrasound-guided PVC placements in clinical settings. In the intervention group, the first 5 procedures were performed with device support and the last 5 without to assess skill transfer. The primary outcome was procedural success rate. Secondary outcomes included procedure time, number of attempts among successful procedures, and self-perceived mastery. Analyses were conducted at the attempt level.
Results: A total of 200 clinical procedures were analyzed (110 control, 90 intervention). The overall success rate was 78.0%, with no statistically significant difference detected between the control and intervention groups (76.4% vs. 80.0%, P=0.656). Procedures in the intervention group were associated with longer completion times compared with the control group (12.64 vs. 11.25 min, P=0.009). Learning curve analyses showed numerical improvements in procedure time over successive attempts in both groups, but no statistically significant acceleration of learning was detected in the intervention group. Self-perceived mastery did not differ between groups and remained stable over time.
Conclusions: In this pragmatic exploratory educational setting, integrating an ultrasound guidance/visualization device into an existing nurse training curriculum was not associated with improved procedural success or faster learning and was associated with longer procedure times. These findings suggest that the educational impact of technology-enhanced training depends less on technology alone than on its curricular integration and support for skill transfer.
超声引导外周静脉导管(PVC)放置越来越多地由护士执行,需要获得复杂的视觉运动和认知技能。已经开发了技术增强的指导工具以促进学习,但将其添加到现有培训课程中的教育效益仍不确定,特别是在辅助医疗人群中。方法:我们进行了一项单中心随机教育研究,比较超声引导下护士PVC放置的标准培训和技术辅助培训。20名护士随机分为对照组(标准培训,n=11)和干预组(标准培训加超声引导/可视化设备使用,n=9)。所有参与者都接受了相同的理论指导和基于人体模型的实践。在3个月内,每位护士在临床环境中连续进行10次超声引导下的PVC放置。在干预组中,前5个程序在设备支持下进行,后5个程序不进行技能转移评估。主要观察指标为手术成功率。次要结果包括手术时间、成功手术的尝试次数和自我感知掌握程度。在尝试水平上进行分析。结果:共分析200例临床手术(对照组110例,干预组90例)。总成功率为78.0%,对照组与干预组比较差异无统计学意义(76.4% vs. 80.0%, P=0.656)。与对照组相比,干预组的手术完成时间更长(12.64分钟对11.25分钟,P=0.009)。学习曲线分析显示,在连续的尝试中,两组的学习时间都有数值上的改善,但在干预组中没有发现统计学上显著的学习加速。自我感知的掌握在不同的组之间没有差异,并且随着时间的推移保持稳定。结论:在这个实用的探索性教育环境中,将超声引导/可视化设备整合到现有的护士培训课程中与提高手术成功率或更快的学习无关,而是与更长的手术时间相关。这些发现表明,技术增强培训对教育的影响与其说取决于技术本身,不如说是取决于其课程整合和对技能转移的支持。
期刊介绍:
Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.