{"title":"Automatic radiology report generation: a systematic review of emerging AI architectures and multimodal technologies","authors":"Moustapha Boubacar Hamma, Zakariae Alami Merrouni, Bouchra Frikh, Brahim Ouhbi","doi":"10.1007/s10462-026-11556-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Generating radiology reports from medical images is a labour-intensive task, exacerbated by the global shortage of radiologists and the complexity of image interpretation. Automatic radiology report generation (ARRG) has emerged to address this challenge, with AI-driven methods showing promise in accelerating diagnosis and improving workflow efficiency. While previous reviews primarily focus on conventional AI and deep learning models and often adopt non-systematic methodologies, this work provides a systematic PRISMA-based review of 51 studies published between 2015 and 2025, offering a rigorous synthesis of model architectures, learning paradigms, data strategies, and evaluation metrics. We categorize approaches from classical CNN-RNN frameworks to emerging paradigms including knowledge graphs, large language models (LLMs), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), AI agents, and multimodal vision-language models. Our analysis highlights key challenges in clinical translation, including model explainability, factual accuracy, generalization across modalities, and deployment feasibility. We also critically evaluate benchmark datasets and performance metrics, identifying inconsistencies that hinder fair comparison and clinical adoption. Finally, we propose actionable research directions to advance clinically reliable, explainable, and generalizable ARRG systems. By linking technical developments to real-world clinical requirements, this review serves as a forward-looking reference for researchers and practitioners aiming to bridge the gap from AI prototypes to trusted clinical tools.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"59 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-026-11556-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-026-11556-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Generating radiology reports from medical images is a labour-intensive task, exacerbated by the global shortage of radiologists and the complexity of image interpretation. Automatic radiology report generation (ARRG) has emerged to address this challenge, with AI-driven methods showing promise in accelerating diagnosis and improving workflow efficiency. While previous reviews primarily focus on conventional AI and deep learning models and often adopt non-systematic methodologies, this work provides a systematic PRISMA-based review of 51 studies published between 2015 and 2025, offering a rigorous synthesis of model architectures, learning paradigms, data strategies, and evaluation metrics. We categorize approaches from classical CNN-RNN frameworks to emerging paradigms including knowledge graphs, large language models (LLMs), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), AI agents, and multimodal vision-language models. Our analysis highlights key challenges in clinical translation, including model explainability, factual accuracy, generalization across modalities, and deployment feasibility. We also critically evaluate benchmark datasets and performance metrics, identifying inconsistencies that hinder fair comparison and clinical adoption. Finally, we propose actionable research directions to advance clinically reliable, explainable, and generalizable ARRG systems. By linking technical developments to real-world clinical requirements, this review serves as a forward-looking reference for researchers and practitioners aiming to bridge the gap from AI prototypes to trusted clinical tools.
期刊介绍:
Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.