Rethinking EDSS-based ambulation assessment in multiple sclerosis using continuous variable monitoring.

IF 4 Q2 Medicine
Noah M Werner, Melanie Schuette, Ramona Hagler, Jan Voth, Balázs Danajka, Patricia Kirschner, Markus Heibel, Tjalf Ziemssen, Uwe K Zettl, Sven G Meuth, Marc Pawlitzki, Lars Masanneck
{"title":"Rethinking EDSS-based ambulation assessment in multiple sclerosis using continuous variable monitoring.","authors":"Noah M Werner, Melanie Schuette, Ramona Hagler, Jan Voth, Balázs Danajka, Patricia Kirschner, Markus Heibel, Tjalf Ziemssen, Uwe K Zettl, Sven G Meuth, Marc Pawlitzki, Lars Masanneck","doi":"10.1186/s42466-026-00501-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by relapses and progressive disability. The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), used to quantify disability, is based on single, discretely assessed and potentially inaccurate patient-estimated walking ability, whereas digital health technologies (DHTs) enable continuous activity monitoring and more objective assessment of real-world functional performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective observational study conducted at two German centers, patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) underwent clinical assessments at baseline (V1) and study completion (V2). Walking distance and step counts were measured using a measuring wheel and pedometer, while continuous physical activity was assessed via smartwatch-derived metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen patients with RRMS were included (median age 57.5 years [interquartile range (IQR) 49.25-63.25]; median EDSS 4.5 [IQR 3.5-6]). Patient-estimated walking distance at V1 showed moderate correlation with clinically measured distance (Spearman's ρ = 0.60, p = 0.013), with 12 of 16 patients misjudging distances relative to EDSS thresholds. Walking distance showed intra-individual variability between V1 and V2 (median absolute difference: 113.6 m). Median daily walking distance (ρ = -0.61, p = 0.0123), step count (ρ = -0.64, p = 0.0082), and peak steps (ρ = -0.69, p = 0.0032) correlated negatively with EDSS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient-estimated maximum walking distance demonstrated moderate agreement with clinical performance and frequently crossed EDSS thresholds, while clinical assessments varied substantially within individuals over the short study duration, underscoring the limitations of single evaluations. In contrast, smartwatch-derived metrics aligned with clinical measures, reflected EDSS scores, and captured real-world mobility.</p>","PeriodicalId":94156,"journal":{"name":"Neurological research and practice","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13263936/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-026-00501-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by relapses and progressive disability. The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), used to quantify disability, is based on single, discretely assessed and potentially inaccurate patient-estimated walking ability, whereas digital health technologies (DHTs) enable continuous activity monitoring and more objective assessment of real-world functional performance.

Methods: In this prospective observational study conducted at two German centers, patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) underwent clinical assessments at baseline (V1) and study completion (V2). Walking distance and step counts were measured using a measuring wheel and pedometer, while continuous physical activity was assessed via smartwatch-derived metrics.

Results: Sixteen patients with RRMS were included (median age 57.5 years [interquartile range (IQR) 49.25-63.25]; median EDSS 4.5 [IQR 3.5-6]). Patient-estimated walking distance at V1 showed moderate correlation with clinically measured distance (Spearman's ρ = 0.60, p = 0.013), with 12 of 16 patients misjudging distances relative to EDSS thresholds. Walking distance showed intra-individual variability between V1 and V2 (median absolute difference: 113.6 m). Median daily walking distance (ρ = -0.61, p = 0.0123), step count (ρ = -0.64, p = 0.0082), and peak steps (ρ = -0.69, p = 0.0032) correlated negatively with EDSS.

Conclusion: Patient-estimated maximum walking distance demonstrated moderate agreement with clinical performance and frequently crossed EDSS thresholds, while clinical assessments varied substantially within individuals over the short study duration, underscoring the limitations of single evaluations. In contrast, smartwatch-derived metrics aligned with clinical measures, reflected EDSS scores, and captured real-world mobility.

用连续变量监测重新思考基于edss的多发性硬化症活动评估。
背景:多发性硬化症(MS)是中枢神经系统(CNS)的一种慢性炎症性疾病,以复发和进行性残疾为特征。用于量化残疾的扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)是基于单一的、离散的评估和可能不准确的患者估计的行走能力,而数字健康技术(dht)能够持续监测活动和更客观地评估现实世界的功能表现。方法:在德国两个中心进行的这项前瞻性观察性研究中,复发-缓解型多发性硬化(RRMS)患者在基线(V1)和研究完成(V2)时接受了临床评估。步行距离和步数是通过测量轮和计步器测量的,而持续的身体活动是通过智能手表衍生的指标来评估的。结果:纳入16例RRMS患者(中位年龄57.5岁[四分位数间距(IQR) 49.25-63.25];中位EDSS 4.5 [IQR 3.5-6])。患者估计的V1步行距离与临床测量的距离有中度相关性(Spearman ρ = 0.60, p = 0.013), 16例患者中有12例对EDSS阈值的距离判断错误。步行距离在V1和V2之间存在个体内差异(绝对差值中位数为113.6 m)。中位日步行距离(ρ = -0.61, p = 0.0123)、步数(ρ = -0.64, p = 0.0082)和峰值步数(ρ = -0.69, p = 0.0032)与EDSS呈负相关。结论:患者估计的最大步行距离与临床表现有一定程度的一致性,并且经常超过EDSS阈值,而在短的研究时间内,个体的临床评估差异很大,强调了单一评估的局限性。相比之下,智能手表衍生的指标与临床测量结果一致,反映了EDSS分数,并捕获了现实世界的移动性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书