An artificial intelligence-driven fuzzy decision-making framework integrating natural language processing and rule-based logic for preventing agile fatigue

IF 18.8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Artificial Intelligence Review Pub Date : 2026-04-25 Epub Date: 2026-06-10 DOI:10.1007/s10462-026-11562-1
Serkan Eti, Onur Kardeş, Serhat Yüksel, Hasan Dinçer, Öznur Gülen Ertosun, Özge Doğuç
{"title":"An artificial intelligence-driven fuzzy decision-making framework integrating natural language processing and rule-based logic for preventing agile fatigue","authors":"Serkan Eti,&nbsp;Onur Kardeş,&nbsp;Serhat Yüksel,&nbsp;Hasan Dinçer,&nbsp;Öznur Gülen Ertosun,&nbsp;Özge Doğuç","doi":"10.1007/s10462-026-11562-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Although agile management practices offer advantages such as flexibility and speed, their excessive or improper implementation can lead to agile fatigue, negatively affecting organizational efficiency and employee performance. While the literature extensively examines the antecedents of agile fatigue, studies that systematically prioritize prevention strategies across different organizational contexts remain limited. Therefore, this study aims to identify strategic priorities for preventing agile fatigue and to develop an AI-based fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making framework to support objective and data-driven decision-making from a cross-sectoral perspective rather than focusing on a single industry. The proposed model employs AI-supported natural language processing (NLP) and rule-based decision logic to automatically extract key concepts from literature summaries and generate a structured criteria set. Expert opinions obtained from a limited but heterogeneous group of agile-experienced professionals are weighted based on demographic characteristics using the z-score based normalized ideal distance method (z-NIDM), while criteria weights are calculated via the CRITIC method and strategic alternatives are ranked using the ARLON method. The framework integrates Sierpinski Triangle, Pythagorean, and Fermatean fuzzy sets to model uncertainty in a robust and comparative manner. The findings indicate that business process flexibility (0.178) and cultural adaptation and communication (0.169) are the most critical criteria, while culture and communication strategies (0.194) and business process and structural strategies (0.168) emerge as the most effective interventions. From a practical perspective, these results provide analytically grounded and transferable guidance for managers across different industries by prioritizing structural and cultural actions over isolated technological or training initiatives, offering a strategic roadmap for sustainable agile transformation and the prevention of agile fatigue without claiming universal generalizability.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"59 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-026-11562-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-026-11562-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although agile management practices offer advantages such as flexibility and speed, their excessive or improper implementation can lead to agile fatigue, negatively affecting organizational efficiency and employee performance. While the literature extensively examines the antecedents of agile fatigue, studies that systematically prioritize prevention strategies across different organizational contexts remain limited. Therefore, this study aims to identify strategic priorities for preventing agile fatigue and to develop an AI-based fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making framework to support objective and data-driven decision-making from a cross-sectoral perspective rather than focusing on a single industry. The proposed model employs AI-supported natural language processing (NLP) and rule-based decision logic to automatically extract key concepts from literature summaries and generate a structured criteria set. Expert opinions obtained from a limited but heterogeneous group of agile-experienced professionals are weighted based on demographic characteristics using the z-score based normalized ideal distance method (z-NIDM), while criteria weights are calculated via the CRITIC method and strategic alternatives are ranked using the ARLON method. The framework integrates Sierpinski Triangle, Pythagorean, and Fermatean fuzzy sets to model uncertainty in a robust and comparative manner. The findings indicate that business process flexibility (0.178) and cultural adaptation and communication (0.169) are the most critical criteria, while culture and communication strategies (0.194) and business process and structural strategies (0.168) emerge as the most effective interventions. From a practical perspective, these results provide analytically grounded and transferable guidance for managers across different industries by prioritizing structural and cultural actions over isolated technological or training initiatives, offering a strategic roadmap for sustainable agile transformation and the prevention of agile fatigue without claiming universal generalizability.

Abstract Image

结合自然语言处理和规则逻辑的人工智能驱动模糊决策框架,预防敏捷疲劳
尽管敏捷管理实践提供了灵活性和速度等优势,但它们的过度或不当实施可能导致敏捷疲劳,对组织效率和员工绩效产生负面影响。虽然文献广泛地研究了敏捷疲劳的前因,但在不同的组织环境中系统地优先考虑预防策略的研究仍然有限。因此,本研究旨在确定防止敏捷疲劳的战略重点,并开发基于人工智能的模糊多准则决策框架,以支持从跨部门角度而不是单一行业的客观和数据驱动的决策。该模型采用人工智能支持的自然语言处理(NLP)和基于规则的决策逻辑,从文献摘要中自动提取关键概念,并生成结构化标准集。从一个有限但异质性的敏捷经验专业人员群体中获得的专家意见,使用基于z分数的归一化理想距离法(z-NIDM)根据人口统计学特征进行加权,而标准权重通过CRITIC方法计算,战略选择使用ARLON方法进行排名。该框架集成了Sierpinski三角、毕达哥拉斯和Fermatean模糊集,以鲁棒和比较的方式对不确定性进行建模。研究结果表明,业务流程灵活性(0.178)和文化适应与沟通(0.169)是最关键的标准,而文化与沟通策略(0.194)和业务流程与结构策略(0.168)是最有效的干预措施。从实际的角度来看,这些结果为不同行业的管理者提供了分析基础和可转移的指导,通过优先考虑结构和文化行动,而不是孤立的技术或培训计划,为可持续的敏捷转型和预防敏捷疲劳提供了战略路线图,而不是声称具有普遍的普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书