Assessing Competences in Sustainability, Ethics, and Gender Perspectives in Final Degree Projects

IF 1 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Adriana Dapena;Paula M. Castro;Lucas Alonso de San Segundo;Óscar Fresnedo
{"title":"Assessing Competences in Sustainability, Ethics, and Gender Perspectives in Final Degree Projects","authors":"Adriana Dapena;Paula M. Castro;Lucas Alonso de San Segundo;Óscar Fresnedo","doi":"10.1109/RITA.2026.3697049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Final Degree Project (FDP) represents the culmination of higher education studies and marks a key transition from academic training to professional practice. This paper aims to analyze the integration of sustainability, ethics, and gender perspectives in the design, development, and evaluation of FDPs, in alignment with the principles of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA). These dimensions are essential for fostering transversal competences that prepare students to address complex social and professional challenges. We propose a general framework for addressing these cross-cutting aspects throughout the different stages of the FDP process. This involves embedding them in course guides, applying them during project development, and integrating them into the final evaluation criteria. Additionally, we present two case studies that illustrate the current state of integration of these dimensions in real FDP contexts. The analysis reveals that, while some sustainability, ethical, and gender-related aspects are already considered, their implementation remains partial and inconsistent. This highlights the need for clearer guidelines, structured methodologies, and greater institutional support to ensure their effective incorporation.","PeriodicalId":38963,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje","volume":"21 ","pages":"385-393"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11535439","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11535439/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Final Degree Project (FDP) represents the culmination of higher education studies and marks a key transition from academic training to professional practice. This paper aims to analyze the integration of sustainability, ethics, and gender perspectives in the design, development, and evaluation of FDPs, in alignment with the principles of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA). These dimensions are essential for fostering transversal competences that prepare students to address complex social and professional challenges. We propose a general framework for addressing these cross-cutting aspects throughout the different stages of the FDP process. This involves embedding them in course guides, applying them during project development, and integrating them into the final evaluation criteria. Additionally, we present two case studies that illustrate the current state of integration of these dimensions in real FDP contexts. The analysis reveals that, while some sustainability, ethical, and gender-related aspects are already considered, their implementation remains partial and inconsistent. This highlights the need for clearer guidelines, structured methodologies, and greater institutional support to ensure their effective incorporation.
评估可持续性,道德和性别观点在最终学位项目的能力
最终学位项目(FDP)代表了高等教育研究的高潮,标志着从学术培训到专业实践的关键过渡。本文旨在根据欧洲高等教育区(EHEA)的原则,分析可持续性、伦理和性别观点在fdp设计、开发和评估中的整合。这些方面对于培养学生应对复杂的社会和专业挑战的横向能力至关重要。我们提出了一个总体框架,在整个自由发展进程的不同阶段解决这些交叉方面的问题。这包括将它们嵌入到课程指南中,在项目开发期间应用它们,并将它们集成到最终的评估标准中。此外,我们提出了两个案例研究,说明了这些维度在实际FDP背景下的整合现状。分析显示,虽然已经考虑到一些可持续性、道德和性别方面的问题,但这些问题的执行仍然是片面和不一致的。这突出表明需要更明确的指导方针、结构化的方法和更大的机构支持,以确保它们的有效结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书