Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in German stroke units: a retrospective diagnosis-related group analysis (2019-2024).

IF 4 Q2 Medicine
Matthias N Ungerer, Dirk Bartig, Annika Moreno Agredo, Tobias Braun, Christoph Gumbinger
{"title":"Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in German stroke units: a retrospective diagnosis-related group analysis (2019-2024).","authors":"Matthias N Ungerer, Dirk Bartig, Annika Moreno Agredo, Tobias Braun, Christoph Gumbinger","doi":"10.1186/s42466-026-00506-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) is a safe and effective tool for post-stroke dysphagia assessment. The German Stroke Organization implemented FEES quality benchmarks for stroke unit certification in 2025. This study establishes baseline data on FEES implementation across German stroke units.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of national diagnosis-related group data (2019-2024) was performed. We analyzed data on cases with stroke unit treatment, examining coding of FEES, dysphagia, and PEG placement, and their relationships with stroke type, institutional service level, and patient demographics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,540,947 cases with stroke unit treatment were analyzed across the six-year study period. FEES procedures were coded in 2.7% of cases, increasing from 2.4% (2019) to 3.1% (2024). FEES coding was more common in cases with intracerebral hemorrhage (5.7%) and ischemic stroke (3.4%). Dysphagia was coded in 13.3% of cases, with higher rates in intracerebral hemorrhage (28.5%) compared to ischemic stroke (16.4%). Cases treated in comprehensive stroke units coded FEES procedures (3.6%) more frequently than regional (2.5%) and basic stroke units (1.5%). Sex-based disparities emerged: cases with males were coded with FEES more often (3.1%) than females (2.4%), despite dysphagia being documented more frequently among cases with females (males 13.0%, females 13.8%). The proportion of cases with documented dysphagia among those coded with FEES was 76.2% and remained stable throughout the study period, suggesting broadly consistent case selection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Documentation of FEES among cases with stroke unit treatment has increased but remains substantially below the dysphagia documentation rates, suggesting room for broader implementation. Sex-based disparities in FEES documentation need further investigation. Institutional factors impact documentation rates, indicating a need for tailored quality benchmarks by stroke service level. Improving reimbursement, staff training, and streamlined workflows could enhance access to FEES in German stroke units.</p>","PeriodicalId":94156,"journal":{"name":"Neurological research and practice","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13261969/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-026-00506-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) is a safe and effective tool for post-stroke dysphagia assessment. The German Stroke Organization implemented FEES quality benchmarks for stroke unit certification in 2025. This study establishes baseline data on FEES implementation across German stroke units.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of national diagnosis-related group data (2019-2024) was performed. We analyzed data on cases with stroke unit treatment, examining coding of FEES, dysphagia, and PEG placement, and their relationships with stroke type, institutional service level, and patient demographics.

Results: A total of 1,540,947 cases with stroke unit treatment were analyzed across the six-year study period. FEES procedures were coded in 2.7% of cases, increasing from 2.4% (2019) to 3.1% (2024). FEES coding was more common in cases with intracerebral hemorrhage (5.7%) and ischemic stroke (3.4%). Dysphagia was coded in 13.3% of cases, with higher rates in intracerebral hemorrhage (28.5%) compared to ischemic stroke (16.4%). Cases treated in comprehensive stroke units coded FEES procedures (3.6%) more frequently than regional (2.5%) and basic stroke units (1.5%). Sex-based disparities emerged: cases with males were coded with FEES more often (3.1%) than females (2.4%), despite dysphagia being documented more frequently among cases with females (males 13.0%, females 13.8%). The proportion of cases with documented dysphagia among those coded with FEES was 76.2% and remained stable throughout the study period, suggesting broadly consistent case selection.

Conclusion: Documentation of FEES among cases with stroke unit treatment has increased but remains substantially below the dysphagia documentation rates, suggesting room for broader implementation. Sex-based disparities in FEES documentation need further investigation. Institutional factors impact documentation rates, indicating a need for tailored quality benchmarks by stroke service level. Improving reimbursement, staff training, and streamlined workflows could enhance access to FEES in German stroke units.

德国脑卒中患者吞咽的纤维内镜评估:回顾性诊断相关组分析(2019-2024)。
背景:光纤内镜吞咽评估(FEES)是卒中后吞咽困难评估的一种安全有效的工具。德国卒中组织在2025年实施了卒中单元认证的FEES质量基准。本研究建立了德国卒中单位FEES实施的基线数据。方法:对2019-2024年全国诊断相关组数据进行回顾性分析。我们分析了卒中单元治疗病例的数据,检查了FEES编码、吞咽困难和PEG放置,以及它们与卒中类型、机构服务水平和患者人口统计学的关系。结果:在六年的研究期间,共分析了1,540,947例卒中单元治疗。2.7%的病例编码了收费程序,从2019年的2.4%增加到2024年的3.1%。FEES编码在脑出血(5.7%)和缺血性脑卒中(3.4%)病例中更为常见。13.3%的病例出现吞咽困难,其中脑出血(28.5%)的发生率高于缺血性卒中(16.4%)。在综合卒中单元编码费用程序中治疗的病例(3.6%)比区域卒中单元(2.5%)和基本卒中单元(1.5%)更频繁。基于性别的差异出现了:尽管吞咽困难在女性病例中更常见(男性13.0%,女性13.8%),但男性病例的FEES编码频率(3.1%)高于女性(2.4%)。在以FEES编码的病例中,记录的吞咽困难病例的比例为76.2%,并且在整个研究期间保持稳定,表明病例选择大致一致。结论:在卒中单元治疗的病例中,费用的记录有所增加,但仍大大低于吞咽困难的记录率,这表明有更广泛实施的空间。学费文件中基于性别的差异需要进一步调查。制度因素影响记录率,表明需要根据卒中服务水平定制质量基准。改善报销、员工培训和简化工作流程可以提高德国中风单位的费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书