Evaluating the combined effects of effort and probability on monetary discounting

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Kylee Drugan-Eppich, David J. Cox
{"title":"Evaluating the combined effects of effort and probability on monetary discounting","authors":"Kylee Drugan-Eppich,&nbsp;David J. Cox","doi":"10.1002/jeab.70118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Researchers have studied how the effort to obtain a reward affects its value and how effort discounting compares to other reinforcer characteristics (e.g., delay, social, probability). However, many everyday choices are likely influenced by how effort combines with other reinforcer characteristics, which have primarily been studied in isolation. In this experiment, we tested nine models describing how effort combines with probability to influence monetary discounting of $100 using an adjusting-amount task. Overall, participants' (<i>N</i> = 61) choices followed expected patterns: Steeper probability discounting was observed at higher effort levels, and steeper effort discounting was observed at lower probabilities. All nine effort-probability models described group and individual data well. Using AICc, the general theory of discounting model best described most participants' data, with Rachlin's multiplicative hyperboloid model ranking second and a multiplicative combination of Rachlin's hyperboloid for probability and a power-law for effort ranking third. In total, the results from model fitting indicate that probability and effort interact to influence choice. Existing models describe this interaction well, but future research will be needed to determine the conditions under which different models might be favored. These preliminary findings add effort-probability interactions to the literature on the multiple control of choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":17411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior","volume":"126 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeab.70118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Researchers have studied how the effort to obtain a reward affects its value and how effort discounting compares to other reinforcer characteristics (e.g., delay, social, probability). However, many everyday choices are likely influenced by how effort combines with other reinforcer characteristics, which have primarily been studied in isolation. In this experiment, we tested nine models describing how effort combines with probability to influence monetary discounting of $100 using an adjusting-amount task. Overall, participants' (N = 61) choices followed expected patterns: Steeper probability discounting was observed at higher effort levels, and steeper effort discounting was observed at lower probabilities. All nine effort-probability models described group and individual data well. Using AICc, the general theory of discounting model best described most participants' data, with Rachlin's multiplicative hyperboloid model ranking second and a multiplicative combination of Rachlin's hyperboloid for probability and a power-law for effort ranking third. In total, the results from model fitting indicate that probability and effort interact to influence choice. Existing models describe this interaction well, but future research will be needed to determine the conditions under which different models might be favored. These preliminary findings add effort-probability interactions to the literature on the multiple control of choice.

评估努力和概率对货币贴现的综合影响。
研究人员已经研究了获得奖励的努力如何影响其价值,以及努力折扣与其他强化因素特征(如延迟、社交、概率)的比较。然而,许多日常选择可能受到努力如何与其他强化因素特征结合的影响,这些特征主要是单独研究的。在这个实验中,我们测试了9个模型,这些模型描述了如何使用调整金额任务将努力与概率结合起来影响100美元的货币贴现。总体而言,参与者(N = 61)的选择遵循预期模式:在更高的努力水平上观察到更陡的概率折扣,在更低的概率水平上观察到更陡的努力折扣。所有九个努力-概率模型都很好地描述了群体和个人数据。使用AICc,贴现模型的一般理论最能描述大多数参与者的数据,Rachlin的乘法双曲面模型排名第二,Rachlin的概率双曲面和努力幂律的乘法组合排名第三。总的来说,模型拟合的结果表明,概率和努力相互作用,影响选择。现有的模型很好地描述了这种相互作用,但需要未来的研究来确定在哪些条件下不同的模型可能更受青睐。这些初步的发现为多重选择控制的文献增加了努力-概率的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior is primarily for the original publication of experiments relevant to the behavior of individual organisms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书