Helping families thrive while developing a strong working alliance: The benefits of Recipe 4 Success

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Sarah M. Braaten, Robert L. Nix, Lori A. Francis, Mark E. Feinberg, Michelle L. Hostetler, Cynthia A. Stifter, Sukhdeep Gill
{"title":"Helping families thrive while developing a strong working alliance: The benefits of Recipe 4 Success","authors":"Sarah M. Braaten,&nbsp;Robert L. Nix,&nbsp;Lori A. Francis,&nbsp;Mark E. Feinberg,&nbsp;Michelle L. Hostetler,&nbsp;Cynthia A. Stifter,&nbsp;Sukhdeep Gill","doi":"10.1002/imhj.70105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study explored whether the strength of parent-home visitor working alliances might alter the benefits of Recipe 4 Success, a highly structured food-based curriculum designed to promote parents’ sensitive scaffolding, responsive food parenting practices, toddlers’ self-regulation, and healthy eating habits. This study included 242 parents and their toddlers residing in the United States, most of whom were living in poverty (37% white, 25% Black, 19% Latiné, 17% Multiracial, and 2% Asian; median income = $1555 per month). Families were randomly assigned to Recipe 4 Success or usual practice home visits within home visitor caseload. Home visitors tended to rate their working alliance as very strong versus less strong. Within-group regression equations revealed that, among families with a less strong working alliance, Recipe 4 Success was more effective than usual practice home visits in improving parents’ sensitive scaffolding, responsive food parenting practices, and toddlers’ self-regulation. In contrast, among families who had a strong working alliance, Recipe 4 Success was more effective than usual practice home visits in changing toddlers’ healthy eating habits, including reducing body mass index for toddlers with overweight/obesity. These findings highlight how families with varying strengths of working alliances may benefit differently from highly structured evidence-based curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":48026,"journal":{"name":"Infant Mental Health Journal","volume":"47 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/imhj.70105","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant Mental Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/imhj.70105","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored whether the strength of parent-home visitor working alliances might alter the benefits of Recipe 4 Success, a highly structured food-based curriculum designed to promote parents’ sensitive scaffolding, responsive food parenting practices, toddlers’ self-regulation, and healthy eating habits. This study included 242 parents and their toddlers residing in the United States, most of whom were living in poverty (37% white, 25% Black, 19% Latiné, 17% Multiracial, and 2% Asian; median income = $1555 per month). Families were randomly assigned to Recipe 4 Success or usual practice home visits within home visitor caseload. Home visitors tended to rate their working alliance as very strong versus less strong. Within-group regression equations revealed that, among families with a less strong working alliance, Recipe 4 Success was more effective than usual practice home visits in improving parents’ sensitive scaffolding, responsive food parenting practices, and toddlers’ self-regulation. In contrast, among families who had a strong working alliance, Recipe 4 Success was more effective than usual practice home visits in changing toddlers’ healthy eating habits, including reducing body mass index for toddlers with overweight/obesity. These findings highlight how families with varying strengths of working alliances may benefit differently from highly structured evidence-based curricula.

帮助家庭茁壮成长,同时发展一个强大的工作联盟:成功的秘诀4的好处。
这项研究探讨了父母访家工作联盟的力量是否会改变“成功秘诀4”的好处。“成功秘诀4”是一个高度结构化的以食物为基础的课程,旨在促进父母的敏感框架、反应性食物育儿实践、幼儿的自我调节和健康的饮食习惯。这项研究包括242名居住在美国的父母和他们的孩子,其中大多数生活在贫困中(37%的白人,25%的黑人,19%的拉丁裔,17%的多种族,2%的亚洲人;中位数收入=每月1555美元)。家庭被随机分配到食谱4成功或通常做法家访的家庭访访的情况下,家访的情况。家访者倾向于将他们的工作联盟评为非常强大而不是不那么强大。组内回归方程显示,在工作联盟不强的家庭中,配方4成功比通常的家访更有效地改善了父母的敏感框架,反应性食物育儿实践和幼儿的自我调节。相比之下,在拥有强大工作联盟的家庭中,“成功秘诀4”在改变幼儿健康饮食习惯方面比通常的家访更有效,包括降低超重/肥胖幼儿的体重指数。这些发现强调了工作联盟实力不同的家庭如何从高度结构化的循证课程中获益不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infant Mental Health Journal
Infant Mental Health Journal PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Infant Mental Health Journal (IMHJ) is the official publication of the World Association for Infant Mental Health (WAIMH) and the Michigan Association for Infant Mental Health (MI-AIMH) and is copyrighted by MI-AIMH. The Infant Mental Health Journal publishes peer-reviewed research articles, literature reviews, program descriptions/evaluations, theoretical/conceptual papers and brief reports (clinical case studies and novel pilot studies) that focus on early social and emotional development and characteristics that influence social-emotional development from relationship-based perspectives. Examples of such influences include attachment relationships, early relationship development, caregiver-infant interactions, infant and early childhood mental health services, contextual and cultural influences on infant/toddler/child and family development, including parental/caregiver psychosocial characteristics and attachment history, prenatal experiences, and biological characteristics in interaction with relational environments that promote optimal social-emotional development or place it at higher risk. Research published in IMHJ focuses on the prenatal-age 5 period and employs relationship-based perspectives in key research questions and interpretation and implications of findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书