Sarah M. Braaten, Robert L. Nix, Lori A. Francis, Mark E. Feinberg, Michelle L. Hostetler, Cynthia A. Stifter, Sukhdeep Gill
{"title":"Helping families thrive while developing a strong working alliance: The benefits of Recipe 4 Success","authors":"Sarah M. Braaten, Robert L. Nix, Lori A. Francis, Mark E. Feinberg, Michelle L. Hostetler, Cynthia A. Stifter, Sukhdeep Gill","doi":"10.1002/imhj.70105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study explored whether the strength of parent-home visitor working alliances might alter the benefits of Recipe 4 Success, a highly structured food-based curriculum designed to promote parents’ sensitive scaffolding, responsive food parenting practices, toddlers’ self-regulation, and healthy eating habits. This study included 242 parents and their toddlers residing in the United States, most of whom were living in poverty (37% white, 25% Black, 19% Latiné, 17% Multiracial, and 2% Asian; median income = $1555 per month). Families were randomly assigned to Recipe 4 Success or usual practice home visits within home visitor caseload. Home visitors tended to rate their working alliance as very strong versus less strong. Within-group regression equations revealed that, among families with a less strong working alliance, Recipe 4 Success was more effective than usual practice home visits in improving parents’ sensitive scaffolding, responsive food parenting practices, and toddlers’ self-regulation. In contrast, among families who had a strong working alliance, Recipe 4 Success was more effective than usual practice home visits in changing toddlers’ healthy eating habits, including reducing body mass index for toddlers with overweight/obesity. These findings highlight how families with varying strengths of working alliances may benefit differently from highly structured evidence-based curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":48026,"journal":{"name":"Infant Mental Health Journal","volume":"47 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/imhj.70105","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant Mental Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/imhj.70105","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study explored whether the strength of parent-home visitor working alliances might alter the benefits of Recipe 4 Success, a highly structured food-based curriculum designed to promote parents’ sensitive scaffolding, responsive food parenting practices, toddlers’ self-regulation, and healthy eating habits. This study included 242 parents and their toddlers residing in the United States, most of whom were living in poverty (37% white, 25% Black, 19% Latiné, 17% Multiracial, and 2% Asian; median income = $1555 per month). Families were randomly assigned to Recipe 4 Success or usual practice home visits within home visitor caseload. Home visitors tended to rate their working alliance as very strong versus less strong. Within-group regression equations revealed that, among families with a less strong working alliance, Recipe 4 Success was more effective than usual practice home visits in improving parents’ sensitive scaffolding, responsive food parenting practices, and toddlers’ self-regulation. In contrast, among families who had a strong working alliance, Recipe 4 Success was more effective than usual practice home visits in changing toddlers’ healthy eating habits, including reducing body mass index for toddlers with overweight/obesity. These findings highlight how families with varying strengths of working alliances may benefit differently from highly structured evidence-based curricula.
期刊介绍:
The Infant Mental Health Journal (IMHJ) is the official publication of the World Association for Infant Mental Health (WAIMH) and the Michigan Association for Infant Mental Health (MI-AIMH) and is copyrighted by MI-AIMH. The Infant Mental Health Journal publishes peer-reviewed research articles, literature reviews, program descriptions/evaluations, theoretical/conceptual papers and brief reports (clinical case studies and novel pilot studies) that focus on early social and emotional development and characteristics that influence social-emotional development from relationship-based perspectives. Examples of such influences include attachment relationships, early relationship development, caregiver-infant interactions, infant and early childhood mental health services, contextual and cultural influences on infant/toddler/child and family development, including parental/caregiver psychosocial characteristics and attachment history, prenatal experiences, and biological characteristics in interaction with relational environments that promote optimal social-emotional development or place it at higher risk. Research published in IMHJ focuses on the prenatal-age 5 period and employs relationship-based perspectives in key research questions and interpretation and implications of findings.