Artificial Intelligence in Music Education in Higher Education: Exploring Applications and Pedagogical Considerations

IF 5.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Zhang You
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Music Education in Higher Education: Exploring Applications and Pedagogical Considerations","authors":"Zhang You","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into instrumental music education has rapidly progressed. However, the scholarly landscape remains fragmented and underdeveloped. Current research mainly focuses on algorithm-driven performance and context-specific teaching methods. There has been little effort to connect these advancements to established educational frameworks or to examine their wider implications. This systematic review addresses this gap by providing a thorough synthesis of the field, analyzing 46 highly cited publications indexed in Scopus. This review goes beyond mere listing. It critically examines how leading AI methods, such as deep learning models, transformer-based systems, and generative frameworks, serve as meaningful tools for instrumental learning. Drawing on established frameworks such as the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) model, the Substitution-Augmentation-Modication-Redefinition (SAMR) taxonomy, and Bloom's revised taxonomy, the study offers a well-grounded interpretation of how AI changes teaching design, student engagement, and cognitive growth. The findings show that AI technologies improve practice efficiency, enable personalized learning paths, and create more consistent, data-driven assessment methods. However, the review also highlights major limitations that were overlooked in previous research. These include algorithmic bias, lack of cultural and stylistic sensitivity, difficulties in capturing expressive musical elements, and the lack of clear models for integrating pedagogy with technology. To guide future research and practice, the review urges the creation of culturally responsive AI systems, the establishment of strong ethical and governance structures, and the use of interdisciplinary design approaches that connect technology with educational values. This establishes a critical, forward-looking foundation for viewing AI not just as a tool but as a transformative influence in instrumental music education.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70691","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into instrumental music education has rapidly progressed. However, the scholarly landscape remains fragmented and underdeveloped. Current research mainly focuses on algorithm-driven performance and context-specific teaching methods. There has been little effort to connect these advancements to established educational frameworks or to examine their wider implications. This systematic review addresses this gap by providing a thorough synthesis of the field, analyzing 46 highly cited publications indexed in Scopus. This review goes beyond mere listing. It critically examines how leading AI methods, such as deep learning models, transformer-based systems, and generative frameworks, serve as meaningful tools for instrumental learning. Drawing on established frameworks such as the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) model, the Substitution-Augmentation-Modication-Redefinition (SAMR) taxonomy, and Bloom's revised taxonomy, the study offers a well-grounded interpretation of how AI changes teaching design, student engagement, and cognitive growth. The findings show that AI technologies improve practice efficiency, enable personalized learning paths, and create more consistent, data-driven assessment methods. However, the review also highlights major limitations that were overlooked in previous research. These include algorithmic bias, lack of cultural and stylistic sensitivity, difficulties in capturing expressive musical elements, and the lack of clear models for integrating pedagogy with technology. To guide future research and practice, the review urges the creation of culturally responsive AI systems, the establishment of strong ethical and governance structures, and the use of interdisciplinary design approaches that connect technology with educational values. This establishes a critical, forward-looking foundation for viewing AI not just as a tool but as a transformative influence in instrumental music education.

人工智能在高等音乐教育中的应用与教学思考
人工智能(AI)与器乐教育的融合发展迅速。然而,学术景观仍然是支离破碎和不发达的。目前的研究主要集中在算法驱动性能和情境化教学方法上。很少有人努力将这些进步与既定的教育框架联系起来,或研究它们更广泛的影响。本系统综述通过提供该领域的全面综合,分析了在Scopus中索引的46篇高被引出版物,解决了这一差距。这篇评论不仅仅是罗列。它批判性地研究了领先的人工智能方法,如深度学习模型、基于转换器的系统和生成框架,如何作为工具性学习的有意义的工具。利用技术教学内容知识(TPACK)模型、替代-增强-修改-重新定义(SAMR)分类法和布鲁姆修订的分类法等已建立的框架,该研究对人工智能如何改变教学设计、学生参与和认知增长提供了有根据的解释。研究结果表明,人工智能技术提高了实践效率,实现了个性化的学习路径,并创造了更一致的、数据驱动的评估方法。然而,该综述也强调了在以前的研究中被忽视的主要局限性。这些问题包括算法偏见,缺乏文化和风格敏感性,难以捕捉富有表现力的音乐元素,以及缺乏将教学法与技术相结合的清晰模型。为了指导未来的研究和实践,该综述敦促创建对文化敏感的人工智能系统,建立强有力的道德和治理结构,并使用将技术与教育价值联系起来的跨学科设计方法。这为将人工智能不仅视为工具,而且视为器乐教育的变革性影响奠定了关键的前瞻性基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书