Understanding problematic media use in children and youth at risk for attentional difficulties: a comparative study of community, ADHD, and early neurological risk samples.

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Rachael E Lyon, Elizabeth A Wanstall, Maggie E Toplak, Tricia S Williams
{"title":"Understanding problematic media use in children and youth at risk for attentional difficulties: a comparative study of community, ADHD, and early neurological risk samples.","authors":"Rachael E Lyon, Elizabeth A Wanstall, Maggie E Toplak, Tricia S Williams","doi":"10.1080/09297049.2026.2681663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children with attention difficulties are more susceptible to problematic media use (PMU). However, little consideration has been given to whether the risk of PMU varies based on the nature of attentional difficulties, namely whether children diagnosed with ADHD or difficulties that co-occur with early neurological risk are differentially related to PMU. The Problematic Media Use Measure (PMUM) was examined in three samples of parents with children aged 6-18: Community (<i>N</i> = 386), ADHD (<i>N</i> = 66) and early neurological risk (<i>N</i> = 65) samples, using a mixed-methods approach. Parents were given questionnaires to assess PMU and screen media use and impact, followed by semi-structured interviews with a subset of parents in the ADHD sample. Group comparisons used an age- and sex-matched subset (<i>n</i> = 36/group). Parents in the ADHD group reported higher PMU and more stress related to screen media use compared to both the Early Neurological Risk and Community groups. Parents in the ADHD group also reported significantly more negative and fewer positive impacts of screen media for their children compared to the Community group. Higher PMU was associated with older age in the Early Neurological Risk group (<i>r</i><sub><i>s</i></sub> = .26, <i>p</i> = .04), and higher externalizing behavior in both clinical samples (ADHD, <i>r</i><sub><i>s</i></sub> = .29, <i>p</i> = .02; neurological, <i>r</i><sub><i>s</i></sub> = .56, <i>p</i> < .001). Thematic analysis of parent interviews yielded complementary themes, including unique challenges of screen use for children with ADHD. Clinical implications and future research directions are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9789,"journal":{"name":"Child Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2026.2681663","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children with attention difficulties are more susceptible to problematic media use (PMU). However, little consideration has been given to whether the risk of PMU varies based on the nature of attentional difficulties, namely whether children diagnosed with ADHD or difficulties that co-occur with early neurological risk are differentially related to PMU. The Problematic Media Use Measure (PMUM) was examined in three samples of parents with children aged 6-18: Community (N = 386), ADHD (N = 66) and early neurological risk (N = 65) samples, using a mixed-methods approach. Parents were given questionnaires to assess PMU and screen media use and impact, followed by semi-structured interviews with a subset of parents in the ADHD sample. Group comparisons used an age- and sex-matched subset (n = 36/group). Parents in the ADHD group reported higher PMU and more stress related to screen media use compared to both the Early Neurological Risk and Community groups. Parents in the ADHD group also reported significantly more negative and fewer positive impacts of screen media for their children compared to the Community group. Higher PMU was associated with older age in the Early Neurological Risk group (rs = .26, p = .04), and higher externalizing behavior in both clinical samples (ADHD, rs = .29, p = .02; neurological, rs = .56, p < .001). Thematic analysis of parent interviews yielded complementary themes, including unique challenges of screen use for children with ADHD. Clinical implications and future research directions are discussed.

了解有注意力困难风险的儿童和青少年的问题媒体使用:社区,ADHD和早期神经风险样本的比较研究。
有注意力困难的儿童更容易出现问题媒体使用(PMU)。然而,很少有人考虑到PMU的风险是否会根据注意力困难的性质而变化,即诊断为ADHD的儿童或与早期神经风险同时发生的困难是否与PMU有差异关系。采用混合方法,对6-18岁儿童的父母进行了问题媒体使用测量(PMUM):社区(N = 386), ADHD (N = 66)和早期神经风险(N = 65)样本。研究人员向家长发放问卷,以评估PMU和屏幕媒体的使用及其影响,然后对ADHD样本中的一部分家长进行半结构化访谈。组间比较采用年龄和性别匹配的子集(n = 36/组)。与早期神经风险组和社区组相比,ADHD组的父母报告了更高的PMU和更多与屏幕媒体使用相关的压力。与社区组相比,多动症组的父母也报告了屏幕媒体对孩子的负面影响更多,积极影响更少。在早期神经风险组中,较高的PMU与年龄有关(rs =。26, p =。04),两种临床样本(ADHD, rs =。29, p = .02;神经学,rs =。56岁的p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Child Neuropsychology
Child Neuropsychology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purposes of Child Neuropsychology are to: publish research on the neuropsychological effects of disorders which affect brain functioning in children and adolescents, publish research on the neuropsychological dimensions of development in childhood and adolescence and promote the integration of theory, method and research findings in child/developmental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of Child Neuropsychology is to publish original empirical research. Theoretical and methodological papers and theoretically relevant case studies are welcome. Critical reviews of topics pertinent to child/developmental neuropsychology are encouraged. Emphases of interest include the following: information processing mechanisms; the impact of injury or disease on neuropsychological functioning; behavioral cognitive and pharmacological approaches to treatment/intervention; psychosocial correlates of neuropsychological dysfunction; definitive normative, reliability, and validity studies of psychometric and other procedures used in the neuropsychological assessment of children and adolescents. Articles on both normal and dysfunctional development that are relevant to the aforementioned dimensions are welcome. Multiple approaches (e.g., basic, applied, clinical) and multiple methodologies (e.g., cross-sectional, longitudinal, experimental, multivariate, correlational) are appropriate. Books, media, and software reviews will be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书