Understanding problematic media use in children and youth at risk for attentional difficulties: a comparative study of community, ADHD, and early neurological risk samples.
Rachael E Lyon, Elizabeth A Wanstall, Maggie E Toplak, Tricia S Williams
{"title":"Understanding problematic media use in children and youth at risk for attentional difficulties: a comparative study of community, ADHD, and early neurological risk samples.","authors":"Rachael E Lyon, Elizabeth A Wanstall, Maggie E Toplak, Tricia S Williams","doi":"10.1080/09297049.2026.2681663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children with attention difficulties are more susceptible to problematic media use (PMU). However, little consideration has been given to whether the risk of PMU varies based on the nature of attentional difficulties, namely whether children diagnosed with ADHD or difficulties that co-occur with early neurological risk are differentially related to PMU. The Problematic Media Use Measure (PMUM) was examined in three samples of parents with children aged 6-18: Community (<i>N</i> = 386), ADHD (<i>N</i> = 66) and early neurological risk (<i>N</i> = 65) samples, using a mixed-methods approach. Parents were given questionnaires to assess PMU and screen media use and impact, followed by semi-structured interviews with a subset of parents in the ADHD sample. Group comparisons used an age- and sex-matched subset (<i>n</i> = 36/group). Parents in the ADHD group reported higher PMU and more stress related to screen media use compared to both the Early Neurological Risk and Community groups. Parents in the ADHD group also reported significantly more negative and fewer positive impacts of screen media for their children compared to the Community group. Higher PMU was associated with older age in the Early Neurological Risk group (<i>r</i><sub><i>s</i></sub> = .26, <i>p</i> = .04), and higher externalizing behavior in both clinical samples (ADHD, <i>r</i><sub><i>s</i></sub> = .29, <i>p</i> = .02; neurological, <i>r</i><sub><i>s</i></sub> = .56, <i>p</i> < .001). Thematic analysis of parent interviews yielded complementary themes, including unique challenges of screen use for children with ADHD. Clinical implications and future research directions are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9789,"journal":{"name":"Child Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2026.2681663","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Children with attention difficulties are more susceptible to problematic media use (PMU). However, little consideration has been given to whether the risk of PMU varies based on the nature of attentional difficulties, namely whether children diagnosed with ADHD or difficulties that co-occur with early neurological risk are differentially related to PMU. The Problematic Media Use Measure (PMUM) was examined in three samples of parents with children aged 6-18: Community (N = 386), ADHD (N = 66) and early neurological risk (N = 65) samples, using a mixed-methods approach. Parents were given questionnaires to assess PMU and screen media use and impact, followed by semi-structured interviews with a subset of parents in the ADHD sample. Group comparisons used an age- and sex-matched subset (n = 36/group). Parents in the ADHD group reported higher PMU and more stress related to screen media use compared to both the Early Neurological Risk and Community groups. Parents in the ADHD group also reported significantly more negative and fewer positive impacts of screen media for their children compared to the Community group. Higher PMU was associated with older age in the Early Neurological Risk group (rs = .26, p = .04), and higher externalizing behavior in both clinical samples (ADHD, rs = .29, p = .02; neurological, rs = .56, p < .001). Thematic analysis of parent interviews yielded complementary themes, including unique challenges of screen use for children with ADHD. Clinical implications and future research directions are discussed.
期刊介绍:
The purposes of Child Neuropsychology are to:
publish research on the neuropsychological effects of disorders which affect brain functioning in children and adolescents,
publish research on the neuropsychological dimensions of development in childhood and adolescence and
promote the integration of theory, method and research findings in child/developmental neuropsychology.
The primary emphasis of Child Neuropsychology is to publish original empirical research. Theoretical and methodological papers and theoretically relevant case studies are welcome. Critical reviews of topics pertinent to child/developmental neuropsychology are encouraged.
Emphases of interest include the following: information processing mechanisms; the impact of injury or disease on neuropsychological functioning; behavioral cognitive and pharmacological approaches to treatment/intervention; psychosocial correlates of neuropsychological dysfunction; definitive normative, reliability, and validity studies of psychometric and other procedures used in the neuropsychological assessment of children and adolescents. Articles on both normal and dysfunctional development that are relevant to the aforementioned dimensions are welcome. Multiple approaches (e.g., basic, applied, clinical) and multiple methodologies (e.g., cross-sectional, longitudinal, experimental, multivariate, correlational) are appropriate. Books, media, and software reviews will be published.