Comparative Disruption Behavior of Essential Oil and Fixed Oil Dietary Supplement Softgels Under Biorelevant Conditions.

IF 3.1 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Journal of Dietary Supplements Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-01 DOI:10.1080/19390211.2026.2666547
Catherine M Gurley, Bailey Bergman, Sebastian John Adams, Ikhlas A Khan, Bill J Gurley
{"title":"Comparative Disruption Behavior of Essential Oil and Fixed Oil Dietary Supplement Softgels Under Biorelevant Conditions.","authors":"Catherine M Gurley, Bailey Bergman, Sebastian John Adams, Ikhlas A Khan, Bill J Gurley","doi":"10.1080/19390211.2026.2666547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Softgel capsules are widely used in dietary supplements to deliver lipophilic ingredients, including essential and fixed oils. This study evaluated the disruption behavior of 104 commercially available softgel formulations under biorelevant conditions designed to approximate the gastrointestinal environment. Products were categorized as essential oil-containing (<i>n</i> = 40), fixed oil-containing (<i>n</i> = 48), combination (<i>n</i> = 6), and cannabidiol (CBD)-containing (<i>n</i> = 10) formulations. Disruption testing was conducted in biorelevant media, with enzyme supplementation applied according to shell composition when predefined rupture criteria were not achieved. Essential oil-containing softgels exhibited significantly lower pass rates than fixed oil formulations (35% vs 94%, <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Shell composition also affected outcomes, as gelatin-based systems demonstrated higher overall pass rates than vegetable-based shells (77% vs 26%, <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). A partial rupture-resealing phenomenon characterized by transient fissuring and formation of a persistent hydrated pellicle was observed in certain products. Lot-to-lot variability was identified among selected formulations. These findings indicate that fill composition, shell material, and manufacturing variables contribute to disruption variability in dietary supplement softgels. Evaluation under physiologically informed testing conditions may reveal performance differences not evident under conventional water-based methods and may be particularly relevant for essential oil-containing formulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dietary Supplements","volume":" ","pages":"443-460"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dietary Supplements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19390211.2026.2666547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Softgel capsules are widely used in dietary supplements to deliver lipophilic ingredients, including essential and fixed oils. This study evaluated the disruption behavior of 104 commercially available softgel formulations under biorelevant conditions designed to approximate the gastrointestinal environment. Products were categorized as essential oil-containing (n = 40), fixed oil-containing (n = 48), combination (n = 6), and cannabidiol (CBD)-containing (n = 10) formulations. Disruption testing was conducted in biorelevant media, with enzyme supplementation applied according to shell composition when predefined rupture criteria were not achieved. Essential oil-containing softgels exhibited significantly lower pass rates than fixed oil formulations (35% vs 94%, χ2, p < 0.0001). Shell composition also affected outcomes, as gelatin-based systems demonstrated higher overall pass rates than vegetable-based shells (77% vs 26%, χ2, p < 0.0001). A partial rupture-resealing phenomenon characterized by transient fissuring and formation of a persistent hydrated pellicle was observed in certain products. Lot-to-lot variability was identified among selected formulations. These findings indicate that fill composition, shell material, and manufacturing variables contribute to disruption variability in dietary supplement softgels. Evaluation under physiologically informed testing conditions may reveal performance differences not evident under conventional water-based methods and may be particularly relevant for essential oil-containing formulations.

生物相关条件下精油和固定油膳食补充剂软胶囊的破坏行为比较。
软胶囊广泛用于膳食补充剂,以提供亲脂性成分,包括精油和固定油。本研究评估了104种市售软胶囊制剂在近似胃肠道环境的生物相关条件下的破坏行为。产品被分类为含精油(n = 40),含固定油(n = 48),组合(n = 6)和含大麻二酚(CBD) (n = 10)制剂。在生物相关介质中进行破裂测试,当未达到预定的破裂标准时,根据外壳组成添加酶。含精油软胶囊的通过率明显低于固定油配方(35% vs 94%, χ2, p χ2, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Dietary Supplements
Journal of Dietary Supplements Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dietary Supplements (formerly the Journal of Nutraceuticals, Functional & Medical Foods) has been retitled to reflect the bold departure from a traditional scientific journal presentation to a leading voice for anyone with a stake in dietary supplements. The journal addresses important issues that meet the broad range of interests from researchers, regulators, marketers, educators, and health professionals from academic, governmental, industry, healthcare, public health, and consumer education sectors. This vital tool not only presents scientific information but interprets it - helping you more readily pass it on to your students, patients, clients, or company.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书