Thalamic Volume Asymmetry as a Potential Predictor of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Outcomes in Refractory Epilepsy.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurologia medico-chirurgica Pub Date : 2026-07-15 Epub Date: 2026-05-27 DOI:10.2176/jns-nmc.2025-0409
Masaki Ujihara, Masahito Kawabori, Midori Nakajima, Yuki Ueda, Toru Horinouchi, Kiyoshi Egawa, Takahiro A Kato, Miki Fujimura
{"title":"Thalamic Volume Asymmetry as a Potential Predictor of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Outcomes in Refractory Epilepsy.","authors":"Masaki Ujihara, Masahito Kawabori, Midori Nakajima, Yuki Ueda, Toru Horinouchi, Kiyoshi Egawa, Takahiro A Kato, Miki Fujimura","doi":"10.2176/jns-nmc.2025-0409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vagus nerve stimulation is an established treatment for refractory epilepsy, but predictors of treatment response remain unclear. Given that left-sided vagus nerve stimulation preferentially modulates the left thalamus and that epileptic networks induce thalamic structural damage, we investigated whether preoperative thalamic volume asymmetry predicts vagus nerve stimulation outcomes. This retrospective study included 17 patients with refractory epilepsy who underwent vagus nerve stimulation implantation. Patients were classified as responders (≥50% seizure reduction at 24 months, n = 9) or non-responders (n = 8). Thalamic volumes were manually segmented on preoperative T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging by 2 blinded raters, and we used the rater-averaged values to calculate the left/right volume ratio and asymmetry index. The mean thalamic volume ratio (left/right) was significantly higher in responders than non-responders (1.00 [95% confidence interval 0.97-1.03] vs 0.96 [95% confidence interval 0.92-0.99], p = 0.027), and the asymmetry index also differed between groups (0.00 [95% confidence interval -0.015 to 0.017] vs -0.023 [95% confidence interval -0.040 to -0.006], p = 0.027). Inter-rater reliability was acceptable for absolute volumes but was lower for ratio-based asymmetry indices, suggesting that these derived metrics may be more suitable for group-level comparisons than for single-patient prediction. Epileptogenic laterality determined by electroencephalography did not predict thalamic asymmetry. Relative left thalamic volume reduction was associated with poor vagus nerve stimulation treatment response. Assessment of preoperative thalamic asymmetry on routine structural magnetic resonance imaging may represent a candidate biomarker for predicting vagus nerve stimulation efficacy, pending validation in larger cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":19225,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","volume":" ","pages":"490-499"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13441519/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2025-0409","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vagus nerve stimulation is an established treatment for refractory epilepsy, but predictors of treatment response remain unclear. Given that left-sided vagus nerve stimulation preferentially modulates the left thalamus and that epileptic networks induce thalamic structural damage, we investigated whether preoperative thalamic volume asymmetry predicts vagus nerve stimulation outcomes. This retrospective study included 17 patients with refractory epilepsy who underwent vagus nerve stimulation implantation. Patients were classified as responders (≥50% seizure reduction at 24 months, n = 9) or non-responders (n = 8). Thalamic volumes were manually segmented on preoperative T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging by 2 blinded raters, and we used the rater-averaged values to calculate the left/right volume ratio and asymmetry index. The mean thalamic volume ratio (left/right) was significantly higher in responders than non-responders (1.00 [95% confidence interval 0.97-1.03] vs 0.96 [95% confidence interval 0.92-0.99], p = 0.027), and the asymmetry index also differed between groups (0.00 [95% confidence interval -0.015 to 0.017] vs -0.023 [95% confidence interval -0.040 to -0.006], p = 0.027). Inter-rater reliability was acceptable for absolute volumes but was lower for ratio-based asymmetry indices, suggesting that these derived metrics may be more suitable for group-level comparisons than for single-patient prediction. Epileptogenic laterality determined by electroencephalography did not predict thalamic asymmetry. Relative left thalamic volume reduction was associated with poor vagus nerve stimulation treatment response. Assessment of preoperative thalamic asymmetry on routine structural magnetic resonance imaging may represent a candidate biomarker for predicting vagus nerve stimulation efficacy, pending validation in larger cohorts.

丘脑体积不对称作为难治性癫痫迷走神经刺激结果的潜在预测因子。
迷走神经刺激是治疗难治性癫痫的有效方法,但治疗反应的预测因素尚不清楚。考虑到左侧迷走神经刺激优先调节左侧丘脑和癫痫网络诱导丘脑结构损伤,我们研究了术前丘脑体积不对称是否预测迷走神经刺激的结果。回顾性研究17例难治性癫痫患者行迷走神经刺激植入术。患者被分为有反应者(24个月时癫痫发作减少≥50%,n = 9)和无反应者(n = 8)。术前t2加权磁共振成像上由2位盲法评分者人工分割丘脑体积,用评分者的平均值计算左右体积比和不对称指数。反应者的平均丘脑体积比(左/右)显著高于无反应者(1.00[95%可信区间0.97-1.03]vs 0.96[95%可信区间0.92-0.99],p = 0.027),不对称指数组间差异也显著(0.00[95%可信区间-0.015 ~ 0.017]vs -0.023[95%可信区间-0.040 ~ -0.006],p = 0.027)。绝对体积的评分间可靠性是可以接受的,但基于比例的不对称指数的可靠性较低,这表明这些衍生指标可能更适合于组水平的比较,而不是单个患者的预测。脑电图确定的癫痫性偏侧不能预测丘脑不对称。左侧丘脑体积相对减少与迷走神经刺激治疗反应差有关。术前丘脑不对称的常规结构磁共振成像评估可能是预测迷走神经刺激效果的候选生物标志物,有待于更大的队列验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurologia medico-chirurgica
Neurologia medico-chirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
63
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书