An Evaluation of Pediatric Dermatology Fellowship Websites: Content Analysis and Perspectives of Fellows and Program Directors.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Pediatric Dermatology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-26 DOI:10.1111/pde.70271
Cathleen Huang, Vivian C Iloabuchi, Jacob Breinholt, Micah Starghill, Austin Todd, Bryan Witt, Jordan R Pollock, Joyce Chen, Dawn Marie R Davis
{"title":"An Evaluation of Pediatric Dermatology Fellowship Websites: Content Analysis and Perspectives of Fellows and Program Directors.","authors":"Cathleen Huang, Vivian C Iloabuchi, Jacob Breinholt, Micah Starghill, Austin Todd, Bryan Witt, Jordan R Pollock, Joyce Chen, Dawn Marie R Davis","doi":"10.1111/pde.70271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Prospective applicants for pediatric dermatology fellowships often use program websites as a source of information. This study evaluated the content of pediatric dermatology fellowship websites to identify potential areas of improvement including website accessibility and information found on websites. In addition, this study also surveyed current pediatric dermatology fellows and program directors (PDs) to determine priorities in website content across different stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Society for Pediatric Dermatology's (SPD) list of fellowship programs, two independent evaluators assessed the same 40 total programs, with 29 of the same websites included for analysis, against 27 criteria across four domains. In addition, an electronic survey was disseminated via the SPD's mailing list to current pediatric dermatology fellows and fellowship PDs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average between both evaluators, of the 29 included fellowship websites, 9 educational criteria were included 47.8% of the time across the websites, compared to 46.0% of 10 recruitment criteria, 30.7% of 5 social criteria, and 31.6% of 3 other criteria. Fellows were significantly more likely than PDs to consider several website components as highly valuable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings reveal variable and incomplete content across pediatric dermatology fellowship websites, as well as differing expectations for fellowship websites between pediatric dermatology fellowship applicants and PDs, which may help provide suggestions to optimize future website development to enhance applicant engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":19819,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"1098-1103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.70271","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Prospective applicants for pediatric dermatology fellowships often use program websites as a source of information. This study evaluated the content of pediatric dermatology fellowship websites to identify potential areas of improvement including website accessibility and information found on websites. In addition, this study also surveyed current pediatric dermatology fellows and program directors (PDs) to determine priorities in website content across different stakeholders.

Methods: Using the Society for Pediatric Dermatology's (SPD) list of fellowship programs, two independent evaluators assessed the same 40 total programs, with 29 of the same websites included for analysis, against 27 criteria across four domains. In addition, an electronic survey was disseminated via the SPD's mailing list to current pediatric dermatology fellows and fellowship PDs.

Results: On average between both evaluators, of the 29 included fellowship websites, 9 educational criteria were included 47.8% of the time across the websites, compared to 46.0% of 10 recruitment criteria, 30.7% of 5 social criteria, and 31.6% of 3 other criteria. Fellows were significantly more likely than PDs to consider several website components as highly valuable.

Conclusions: These findings reveal variable and incomplete content across pediatric dermatology fellowship websites, as well as differing expectations for fellowship websites between pediatric dermatology fellowship applicants and PDs, which may help provide suggestions to optimize future website development to enhance applicant engagement.

儿童皮肤病学奖学金网站的评估:研究员和项目主任的内容分析和观点。
背景/目的:儿童皮肤病学奖学金的潜在申请人经常使用项目网站作为信息来源。本研究评估了儿科皮肤科奖学金网站的内容,以确定潜在的改进领域,包括网站可访问性和网站上的信息。此外,本研究还调查了当前的儿科皮肤科研究员和项目主任(pd),以确定不同利益相关者在网站内容中的优先级。方法:使用儿童皮肤病学会(SPD)的奖学金项目列表,两位独立评估者评估了相同的40个项目,其中29个相同的网站被纳入分析,针对四个领域的27个标准。此外,一份电子调查通过SPD的邮件列表分发给当前的儿科皮肤科研究员和奖学金博士。结果:在29个被纳入的奖学金网站中,9个教育标准被纳入的时间为47.8%,而10个招聘标准被纳入的时间为46.0%,5个社会标准被纳入的时间为30.7%,3个其他标准被纳入的时间为31.6%。研究员明显比博士更有可能认为网站的几个组成部分是非常有价值的。结论:这些发现揭示了儿科皮肤科奖学金网站内容的多样性和不完整性,以及儿科皮肤科奖学金申请人和博士对奖学金网站的不同期望,这可能有助于为优化未来网站的开发提供建议,以提高申请人的参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
269
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Pediatric Dermatology answers the need for new ideas and strategies for today''s pediatrician or dermatologist. As a teaching vehicle, the Journal is still unsurpassed and it will continue to present the latest on topics such as hemangiomas, atopic dermatitis, rare and unusual presentations of childhood diseases, neonatal medicine, and therapeutic advances. As important progress is made in any area involving infants and children, Pediatric Dermatology is there to publish the findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书