A survey of graphical models for decision-making: integrating causality and game theory

IF 18.8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Artificial Intelligence Review Pub Date : 2026-04-10 Epub Date: 2026-05-27 DOI:10.1007/s10462-026-11537-2
Maarten C. Vonk, Mauricio Gonzalez-Soto, Anna V. Kononova
{"title":"A survey of graphical models for decision-making: integrating causality and game theory","authors":"Maarten C. Vonk,&nbsp;Mauricio Gonzalez-Soto,&nbsp;Anna V. Kononova","doi":"10.1007/s10462-026-11537-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Causality and game theory are two influential fields that contribute significantly to decision-making in various domains. Causality defines and models causal relationships in complex policy problems, while game theory provides insights into strategic interactions among stakeholders with competing interests. Integrating these frameworks has led to significant theoretical advancements with the potential to improve decision-making processes. However, practical applications of these developments remain underexplored. To support efforts toward implementation, this paper surveys key concepts in game theory and causality that are essential to their intersection, particularly within the context of probabilistic graphical models. By rigorously examining these concepts and illustrating them with intuitive, consistent examples, we clarify the required inputs for implementing these models, provide practitioners with insights into their application and selection across different scenarios, and reference existing research that supports their implementation. We hope this work encourages broader adoption of these models in real-world scenarios.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"59 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-026-11537-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-026-11537-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Causality and game theory are two influential fields that contribute significantly to decision-making in various domains. Causality defines and models causal relationships in complex policy problems, while game theory provides insights into strategic interactions among stakeholders with competing interests. Integrating these frameworks has led to significant theoretical advancements with the potential to improve decision-making processes. However, practical applications of these developments remain underexplored. To support efforts toward implementation, this paper surveys key concepts in game theory and causality that are essential to their intersection, particularly within the context of probabilistic graphical models. By rigorously examining these concepts and illustrating them with intuitive, consistent examples, we clarify the required inputs for implementing these models, provide practitioners with insights into their application and selection across different scenarios, and reference existing research that supports their implementation. We hope this work encourages broader adoption of these models in real-world scenarios.

Abstract Image

决策的图形模型综述:整合因果关系和博弈论
因果关系和博弈论是影响决策的两个重要领域。因果关系定义了复杂政策问题中的因果关系并建立了模型,而博弈论则为具有竞争利益的利益相关者之间的战略互动提供了见解。整合这些框架带来了重大的理论进步,有可能改善决策过程。然而,这些发展的实际应用仍未得到充分探索。为了支持实现的努力,本文调查了博弈论和因果关系中的关键概念,这些概念对它们的交叉至关重要,特别是在概率图形模型的背景下。通过严格检查这些概念并使用直观、一致的示例来说明它们,我们澄清了实现这些模型所需的输入,为从业者提供了在不同场景下应用和选择的见解,并参考了支持其实现的现有研究。我们希望这项工作能鼓励这些模型在现实场景中得到更广泛的采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书