Explainable AI for glaucoma detection and classification: a comprehensive review

IF 18.8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Artificial Intelligence Review Pub Date : 2026-04-08 Epub Date: 2026-05-27 DOI:10.1007/s10462-026-11551-4
Ahmed M. Abd El-Gawad, Sarah Hassan, Mohamed Elsharkawy, Shahad Al Hamadani, Aliyah Shivel, Tracy Couch, Ibrahim Saleh, Eman A. Atallah, Mohammed Ghazal, Guruprasad Giridharan, Hanan M. Amer, Abeer Twakol Khalil, Ayman El-Baz
{"title":"Explainable AI for glaucoma detection and classification: a comprehensive review","authors":"Ahmed M. Abd El-Gawad,&nbsp;Sarah Hassan,&nbsp;Mohamed Elsharkawy,&nbsp;Shahad Al Hamadani,&nbsp;Aliyah Shivel,&nbsp;Tracy Couch,&nbsp;Ibrahim Saleh,&nbsp;Eman A. Atallah,&nbsp;Mohammed Ghazal,&nbsp;Guruprasad Giridharan,&nbsp;Hanan M. Amer,&nbsp;Abeer Twakol Khalil,&nbsp;Ayman El-Baz","doi":"10.1007/s10462-026-11551-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness and often advances without symptoms. This PRISMA/PICOS–guided systematic review synthesizes 100 studies (to January 2025) on artificial intelligence (AI) for glaucoma detection, staging, and monitoring using color fundus photography (CFP), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and OCT angiography (OCTA). Roughly 45% of studies use CFP, 55–60% use OCT, and 10–15% use OCTA; about one quarter fuse multiple imaging types with clinical data. Across methods—convolutional neural networks, Transformers, and hybrid fusion—internal test results are strong, with several systems reporting specialist-level sensitivity and specificity. Translation to practice remains limited by small, single-center cohorts, device/domain shifts that reduce generalization, a lack of prospective trials, and explainability approaches that are misaligned with clinical reasoning. We recommend multi-center, multi-ethnic, multi-vendor benchmarks, rigorous external and prospective validation, clinically meaningful and standardized explainability, and cost- and workflow-aware deployment. Addressing these gaps could enable earlier detection, more personalized monitoring, and real-world impact in reducing preventable blindness. Within this review, we investigate key challenges revolving around the use of AI models for glaucoma imaging across different learning paradigms, improving model efficiency, and coupling them with complementary techniques and multimodal data (CFP, OCT, and OCTA). We hope this review can give a comprehensive picture of AI-based methods for glaucoma to readers in the field of medical image analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"59 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-026-11551-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-026-11551-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness and often advances without symptoms. This PRISMA/PICOS–guided systematic review synthesizes 100 studies (to January 2025) on artificial intelligence (AI) for glaucoma detection, staging, and monitoring using color fundus photography (CFP), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and OCT angiography (OCTA). Roughly 45% of studies use CFP, 55–60% use OCT, and 10–15% use OCTA; about one quarter fuse multiple imaging types with clinical data. Across methods—convolutional neural networks, Transformers, and hybrid fusion—internal test results are strong, with several systems reporting specialist-level sensitivity and specificity. Translation to practice remains limited by small, single-center cohorts, device/domain shifts that reduce generalization, a lack of prospective trials, and explainability approaches that are misaligned with clinical reasoning. We recommend multi-center, multi-ethnic, multi-vendor benchmarks, rigorous external and prospective validation, clinically meaningful and standardized explainability, and cost- and workflow-aware deployment. Addressing these gaps could enable earlier detection, more personalized monitoring, and real-world impact in reducing preventable blindness. Within this review, we investigate key challenges revolving around the use of AI models for glaucoma imaging across different learning paradigms, improving model efficiency, and coupling them with complementary techniques and multimodal data (CFP, OCT, and OCTA). We hope this review can give a comprehensive picture of AI-based methods for glaucoma to readers in the field of medical image analysis.

可解释的人工智能青光眼检测与分类综述
青光眼是不可逆性失明的主要原因,通常在没有症状的情况下发展。这项由PRISMA/ picos指导的系统综述综合了100项研究(截至2025年1月),涉及人工智能(AI)在青光眼检测、分期和监测方面的应用,包括彩色眼底摄影(CFP)、光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和OCT血管造影(OCTA)。大约45%的研究使用CFP, 55-60%使用OCT, 10-15%使用OCTA;大约四分之一的人将多种影像类型与临床数据融合。在卷积神经网络、变形金刚和混合融合等方法中,内部测试结果很强,有几个系统报告了专家级别的灵敏度和特异性。翻译到实践仍然受到小的、单中心的队列、设备/领域的转移降低了泛化、缺乏前瞻性试验和与临床推理不一致的可解释性方法的限制。我们建议采用多中心、多民族、多厂商的基准、严格的外部和前瞻性验证、临床意义和标准化的可解释性,以及成本和工作流程感知部署。解决这些差距可以实现更早的发现,更个性化的监测,并在减少可预防失明方面产生实际影响。在这篇综述中,我们研究了围绕在不同学习范式中使用人工智能模型进行青光眼成像的关键挑战,提高了模型效率,并将它们与互补技术和多模态数据(CFP、OCT和OCTA)相结合。我们希望这篇综述能给医学图像分析领域的读者提供一个基于人工智能的青光眼治疗方法的全面图景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书