Facilitators and barriers to effective interprofessional collaboration in rehabilitation services: a systematic review.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Interprofessional Care Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-20 DOI:10.1080/13561820.2026.2672419
Nuralam Sam, Irawan Yusuf, Irwin Aras, Budu, Bau Dilam Ardyansyah
{"title":"Facilitators and barriers to effective interprofessional collaboration in rehabilitation services: a systematic review.","authors":"Nuralam Sam, Irawan Yusuf, Irwin Aras, Budu, Bau Dilam Ardyansyah","doi":"10.1080/13561820.2026.2672419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is essential for effective rehabilitation services, integrating healthcare professionals to optimize patient outcomes. Despite its significance, IPC encounters multiple barriers that hinder its implementation. This systematic review aims to identify and synthesize facilitators and barriers to IPC in rehabilitation services to provide evidence-based recommendations for enhancing collaborative healthcare practices. A systematic search was conducted in January 2025 across PubMed, ScienceDirect, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library. Studies were selected based on inclusion criteria covering qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research on IPC in rehabilitation. Data extraction and quality assessment followed the PRISMA guidelines and utilized the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool for qualitative studies. A total of 1,975 studies were retrieved, with 14 studies included in the final synthesis. Identified barriers included poor communication, unclear professional roles, hierarchical structures, and fragmented care pathways. Conversely, facilitators encompassed structured communication tools, interprofessional education, leadership support, and shared team goals. Effective IPC was associated with improved patient satisfaction, reduced hospital readmissions, and enhanced team efficiency. The findings underscore the necessity of structured interventions, including interprofessional education, standardized care frameworks, and institutional support to enhance IPC in rehabilitation. Addressing barriers through policy improvements and leadership engagement is crucial for fostering a collaborative healthcare culture. Future research should focus on innovative IPC models and their long-term impact on rehabilitation outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","volume":" ","pages":"833-839"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2026.2672419","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is essential for effective rehabilitation services, integrating healthcare professionals to optimize patient outcomes. Despite its significance, IPC encounters multiple barriers that hinder its implementation. This systematic review aims to identify and synthesize facilitators and barriers to IPC in rehabilitation services to provide evidence-based recommendations for enhancing collaborative healthcare practices. A systematic search was conducted in January 2025 across PubMed, ScienceDirect, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library. Studies were selected based on inclusion criteria covering qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research on IPC in rehabilitation. Data extraction and quality assessment followed the PRISMA guidelines and utilized the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool for qualitative studies. A total of 1,975 studies were retrieved, with 14 studies included in the final synthesis. Identified barriers included poor communication, unclear professional roles, hierarchical structures, and fragmented care pathways. Conversely, facilitators encompassed structured communication tools, interprofessional education, leadership support, and shared team goals. Effective IPC was associated with improved patient satisfaction, reduced hospital readmissions, and enhanced team efficiency. The findings underscore the necessity of structured interventions, including interprofessional education, standardized care frameworks, and institutional support to enhance IPC in rehabilitation. Addressing barriers through policy improvements and leadership engagement is crucial for fostering a collaborative healthcare culture. Future research should focus on innovative IPC models and their long-term impact on rehabilitation outcomes.

康复服务中有效跨专业合作的促进因素和障碍:系统回顾。
跨专业协作(IPC)对于有效的康复服务至关重要,整合医疗保健专业人员以优化患者结果。尽管IPC具有重要意义,但它的实施遇到了多种障碍。本系统综述旨在识别和综合康复服务中IPC的促进因素和障碍,为加强协作医疗实践提供循证建议。系统检索于2025年1月在PubMed、ScienceDirect、CINAHL和Cochrane图书馆进行。根据纳入标准选择研究,包括定性、定量和混合方法研究康复中的IPC。数据提取和质量评估遵循PRISMA指南,并利用关键评估技能计划(CASP)工具进行定性研究。共检索了1975项研究,其中14项研究纳入了最终的综合。确定的障碍包括沟通不良、专业角色不明确、等级结构和支离破碎的护理途径。相反,促进者包括结构化的沟通工具、跨专业教育、领导支持和共享的团队目标。有效的IPC与提高患者满意度、减少医院再入院率和提高团队效率相关。研究结果强调了结构化干预的必要性,包括跨专业教育、标准化护理框架和机构支持,以加强IPC在康复中的应用。通过改进政策和领导参与来解决障碍对于促进协作式医疗保健文化至关重要。未来的研究应侧重于创新IPC模式及其对康复结果的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Journal of Interprofessional Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interprofessional Care disseminates research and new developments in the field of interprofessional education and practice. We welcome contributions containing an explicit interprofessional focus, and involving a range of settings, professions, and fields. Areas of practice covered include primary, community and hospital care, health education and public health, and beyond health and social care into fields such as criminal justice and primary/elementary education. Papers introducing additional interprofessional views, for example, from a community development or environmental design perspective, are welcome. The Journal is disseminated internationally and encourages submissions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书