{"title":"Within-Person Effects of Harsh Parenting on Adolescent Peer Acceptance via Interpersonal Accuracy: A Social Accuracy Model Based Longitudinal Study.","authors":"Mingzhong Wang, Zhenlong Zhang, Junhao Gu, Jing Wang, Kexin Zhang, Enyu Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10964-026-02346-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While prior research has established that harsh parenting confers detrimental effects on children's peer relationships, it remains unclear how harsh parenting impaired child peer acceptance via the role of interpersonal accuracy. This three-wave longitudinal study (N = 1212; baseline M<sub>age</sub>=13.12 ± 0.79 years; 46.29% girls) employed the social accuracy model to extract interpersonal accuracy indices and Random-Intercept Longitudinal Panel Models to disentangle within-person and between-person effects. Results showed both harsh fathering and mothering negatively predicted subsequent perceptive distinctive accuracy, expressive normative and distinctive accuracy. Child sex moderated these pathways: Harsh fathering undermined girls' perceptive distinctive accuracy, harsh mothering impaired boys'; only harsh mothering weakened girls' expressive normative accuracy. Perceptive normative accuracy predicted boys' peer acceptance, perceptive distinctive accuracy predicted girls', expressive normative accuracy benefited both, whereas expressive distinctive accuracy showed no predictive effect on either. These findings clarify the role of harsh parenting in child peer acceptance by illuminating its associations with distinct interpersonal accuracy components and the moderating effect of child sex, advancing understandings of this critical developmental relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":17624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","volume":" ","pages":"1713-1732"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-026-02346-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While prior research has established that harsh parenting confers detrimental effects on children's peer relationships, it remains unclear how harsh parenting impaired child peer acceptance via the role of interpersonal accuracy. This three-wave longitudinal study (N = 1212; baseline Mage=13.12 ± 0.79 years; 46.29% girls) employed the social accuracy model to extract interpersonal accuracy indices and Random-Intercept Longitudinal Panel Models to disentangle within-person and between-person effects. Results showed both harsh fathering and mothering negatively predicted subsequent perceptive distinctive accuracy, expressive normative and distinctive accuracy. Child sex moderated these pathways: Harsh fathering undermined girls' perceptive distinctive accuracy, harsh mothering impaired boys'; only harsh mothering weakened girls' expressive normative accuracy. Perceptive normative accuracy predicted boys' peer acceptance, perceptive distinctive accuracy predicted girls', expressive normative accuracy benefited both, whereas expressive distinctive accuracy showed no predictive effect on either. These findings clarify the role of harsh parenting in child peer acceptance by illuminating its associations with distinct interpersonal accuracy components and the moderating effect of child sex, advancing understandings of this critical developmental relationship.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence provides a single, high-level medium of communication for psychologists, psychiatrists, biologists, criminologists, educators, and researchers in many other allied disciplines who address the subject of youth and adolescence. The journal publishes quantitative analyses, theoretical papers, and comprehensive review articles. The journal especially welcomes empirically rigorous papers that take policy implications seriously. Research need not have been designed to address policy needs, but manuscripts must address implications for the manner society formally (e.g., through laws, policies or regulations) or informally (e.g., through parents, peers, and social institutions) responds to the period of youth and adolescence.