Increasing Parental Well-Being After the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Through Relational Savoring

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Family Process Pub Date : 2026-05-16 DOI:10.1111/famp.70152
Kaitlin M. Lord, HaLi Boyce, Michelle A. Fortier, Ohad Szepsenwol, Osnat Zamir, Patricia Tan, Nastassia Hajal, Catherine Mogil, Jessica L. Borelli
{"title":"Increasing Parental Well-Being After the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Through Relational Savoring","authors":"Kaitlin M. Lord,&nbsp;HaLi Boyce,&nbsp;Michelle A. Fortier,&nbsp;Ohad Szepsenwol,&nbsp;Osnat Zamir,&nbsp;Patricia Tan,&nbsp;Nastassia Hajal,&nbsp;Catherine Mogil,&nbsp;Jessica L. Borelli","doi":"10.1111/famp.70152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Despite abundant evidence that the admission of an infant to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is a highly stressful and potentially traumatic experience for both infants and parents, few psychosocial interventions target the needs of parents of NICU infants. In particular, interventions supporting parents beyond the initial medical crisis are notably lacking. Relational savoring (RS) is a brief, positive psychology intervention that attunes one's focus to moments of positive connectedness within their relationships, including parent–child relationships. While the benefits of RS for parent–child dyads are well documented, its efficacy has not been evaluated in parent–child dyads facing significant relational stressors, such as those experienced in post-NICU contexts. Using a randomized controlled design, this study tests the effects of RS compared to a neutral control in 240 post-NICU parents in the United States. Parents reported on their closeness to their child, parental emotional well-being, and parental satisfaction before and after the intervention, as well as their history of perinatal loss and stress. Results of multilevel models suggest that, relative to a neutral control task, parents assigned to the RS intervention group exhibited significantly greater increases in feelings of closeness to their child, parenting satisfaction, and parental emotional well-being. Interestingly, the reduction in negative affect pre- to post-intervention was more pronounced for parents with a history of miscarriage, stillbirth, child loss, and/or fertility difficulties. These findings suggest that RS may represent a scalable intervention to support parent–child relationships and parental well-being in the post-NICU period, particularly for parents with prior perinatal loss and stress.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51396,"journal":{"name":"Family Process","volume":"65 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Process","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/famp.70152","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite abundant evidence that the admission of an infant to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is a highly stressful and potentially traumatic experience for both infants and parents, few psychosocial interventions target the needs of parents of NICU infants. In particular, interventions supporting parents beyond the initial medical crisis are notably lacking. Relational savoring (RS) is a brief, positive psychology intervention that attunes one's focus to moments of positive connectedness within their relationships, including parent–child relationships. While the benefits of RS for parent–child dyads are well documented, its efficacy has not been evaluated in parent–child dyads facing significant relational stressors, such as those experienced in post-NICU contexts. Using a randomized controlled design, this study tests the effects of RS compared to a neutral control in 240 post-NICU parents in the United States. Parents reported on their closeness to their child, parental emotional well-being, and parental satisfaction before and after the intervention, as well as their history of perinatal loss and stress. Results of multilevel models suggest that, relative to a neutral control task, parents assigned to the RS intervention group exhibited significantly greater increases in feelings of closeness to their child, parenting satisfaction, and parental emotional well-being. Interestingly, the reduction in negative affect pre- to post-intervention was more pronounced for parents with a history of miscarriage, stillbirth, child loss, and/or fertility difficulties. These findings suggest that RS may represent a scalable intervention to support parent–child relationships and parental well-being in the post-NICU period, particularly for parents with prior perinatal loss and stress.

通过关系品味增加新生儿重症监护室后父母的幸福感。
尽管有大量证据表明,婴儿入住新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)对婴儿和父母来说都是一个高度紧张和潜在创伤的经历,但很少有社会心理干预措施针对新生儿重症监护病房婴儿父母的需求。特别是,在最初的医疗危机之后支持父母的干预措施明显缺乏。关系品味(RS)是一种简短的、积极的心理学干预,它将一个人的注意力调整到他们关系中的积极联系时刻,包括亲子关系。虽然RS对亲子二人组的益处已被充分证明,但其在面临重大关系压力源的亲子二人组(如在新生儿重症监护病房后经历的情况)中的功效尚未得到评估。本研究采用随机对照设计,在美国240名新生儿重症监护病房后的父母中测试了RS与中性对照的效果。父母在干预前后报告了他们与孩子的亲密程度、父母的情感健康、父母的满意度,以及他们的围产期损失和压力史。多层模型的结果表明,相对于中性的控制任务,被分配到RS干预组的父母在与孩子的亲密感、育儿满意度和父母情绪幸福感方面表现出显著更大的增加。有趣的是,对于有流产、死胎、流产和/或生育困难史的父母,干预前后负面影响的减少更为明显。这些研究结果表明,RS可能是一种可扩展的干预措施,可支持后nicu时期的亲子关系和父母幸福感,特别是对于先前有围产期损失和压力的父母。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Process
Family Process Multiple-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Family Process is an international, multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing original articles, including theory and practice, philosophical underpinnings, qualitative and quantitative clinical research, and training in couple and family therapy, family interaction, and family relationships with networks and larger systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书