Input Language (English, Polish) and Monolingual and Bilingual Children's Use of Compounding and Derivational Word-Formation Processes.

IF 2.1 2区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Jordan S Perry, Denise Davidson
{"title":"Input Language (English, Polish) and Monolingual and Bilingual Children's Use of Compounding and Derivational Word-Formation Processes.","authors":"Jordan S Perry, Denise Davidson","doi":"10.1017/S0305000926100683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Successful use of word-formation strategies is fundamental for children's language development and vocabulary expansion (Clark, 2009, <i>First language acquisition.</i> Cambridge University Press). Notably, English-speaking children tend to use <i>compounding</i> (i.e., the joining of two roots/free morphemes) to form new words, a word-formation device highly productive in English. In contrast, Polish-speaking children rely more on <i>derivation</i> (i.e., the addition of an affix/bound morpheme to a root), a device which is highly productive in Polish. Less is known about how <i>bilingual</i> children apply word-formation devices. Thus, monolingual (English) and bilingual (English/Polish) children completed a word-formation task designed to elicit compounding (root, synthetic) and derivation (noun, verb, adjective). Results showed that bilingual children tested in Polish used more derivation and less compounding than children tested in English (monolingual, bilingual). These findings and others are discussed in terms of how bilingual children's input and testing languages may influence their use of word-formation devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":48132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Language","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000926100683","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Successful use of word-formation strategies is fundamental for children's language development and vocabulary expansion (Clark, 2009, First language acquisition. Cambridge University Press). Notably, English-speaking children tend to use compounding (i.e., the joining of two roots/free morphemes) to form new words, a word-formation device highly productive in English. In contrast, Polish-speaking children rely more on derivation (i.e., the addition of an affix/bound morpheme to a root), a device which is highly productive in Polish. Less is known about how bilingual children apply word-formation devices. Thus, monolingual (English) and bilingual (English/Polish) children completed a word-formation task designed to elicit compounding (root, synthetic) and derivation (noun, verb, adjective). Results showed that bilingual children tested in Polish used more derivation and less compounding than children tested in English (monolingual, bilingual). These findings and others are discussed in terms of how bilingual children's input and testing languages may influence their use of word-formation devices.

输入语言(英语,波兰语)和单语和双语儿童复合和衍生构词过程的使用。
构词法策略的成功使用是儿童语言发展和词汇扩展的基础(Clark, 2009,第一语言习得)。剑桥大学出版社)。值得注意的是,说英语的儿童倾向于使用复合(即两个词根/自由语素的连接)来组成新词,这是英语中非常有效的构词法。相比之下,讲波兰语的孩子更多地依赖派生(即,在词根上添加词缀/绑定语素),这是波兰语中非常有效的一种方法。人们对双语儿童如何运用构词法知之甚少。因此,单语(英语)和双语(英语/波兰语)儿童完成了一个构词任务,该任务旨在引出复合词(词根、合成词)和衍生词(名词、动词、形容词)。结果表明,使用波兰语测试的双语儿童比使用英语测试的儿童(单语、双语)使用更多的衍生词和更少的复合词。这些发现和其他发现都是根据双语儿童的输入和测试语言如何影响他们对构词法的使用来讨论的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: A key publication in the field, Journal of Child Language publishes articles on all aspects of the scientific study of language behaviour in children, the principles which underlie it, and the theories which may account for it. The international range of authors and breadth of coverage allow the journal to forge links between many different areas of research including psychology, linguistics, cognitive science and anthropology. This interdisciplinary approach spans a wide range of interests: phonology, phonetics, morphology, syntax, vocabulary, semantics, pragmatics, sociolinguistics, or any other recognised facet of language study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书