‘Don’t call us vulnerable!’: Rethinking flood vulnerability and community-led governance

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q2 URBAN STUDIES
Ebenezer Forkuo Amankwaa, Yaw Agyeman Boafo, Catalina Spataru, Príscila Carvalho
{"title":"‘Don’t call us vulnerable!’: Rethinking flood vulnerability and community-led governance","authors":"Ebenezer Forkuo Amankwaa, Yaw Agyeman Boafo, Catalina Spataru, Príscila Carvalho","doi":"10.1080/07352166.2024.2401885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditional views on flood vulnerability often present a simplistic government-community relationship, portraying communities as passive recipients of aid. This perspective overlooks the dynamic agency of urban residents in shaping their own governance structures. Recent research challenges this binary thinking by revealing how communities actively manage flood risks. However, the intricate interplay between government absence and community-led actions, and their role in everyday governance, remains underexplored. Drawing on scholarship in flood vulnerability and community-led governance, this paper examines the experiences and management strategies of flood-prone residents in Dansoman, Accra, using interviews, focus groups, and “follow-along participant observation.” Three key themes emerged: “anticipate and navigate,” “collaborate and compensate for,” and “rupture and replace.” These themes illustrate how residents acquiesce to, reconfigure, or challenge government roles in flood management, establishing self-governance through community-led initiatives. These efforts often legitimize and strengthen community resilience, sometimes even usurping and replacing state authority. The findings underscore the need to recognize community agency in managing flood risks and compensating for insufficient government support through solidarity and self-help. Policymakers can enhance flood management by incorporating these community-driven insights, fostering more effective, inclusive, and sustainable strategies that reflect the fluid, evolving relationships between government and communities.","PeriodicalId":17420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Affairs","volume":"48 2","pages":"535-550"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2024.2401885","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Traditional views on flood vulnerability often present a simplistic government-community relationship, portraying communities as passive recipients of aid. This perspective overlooks the dynamic agency of urban residents in shaping their own governance structures. Recent research challenges this binary thinking by revealing how communities actively manage flood risks. However, the intricate interplay between government absence and community-led actions, and their role in everyday governance, remains underexplored. Drawing on scholarship in flood vulnerability and community-led governance, this paper examines the experiences and management strategies of flood-prone residents in Dansoman, Accra, using interviews, focus groups, and “follow-along participant observation.” Three key themes emerged: “anticipate and navigate,” “collaborate and compensate for,” and “rupture and replace.” These themes illustrate how residents acquiesce to, reconfigure, or challenge government roles in flood management, establishing self-governance through community-led initiatives. These efforts often legitimize and strengthen community resilience, sometimes even usurping and replacing state authority. The findings underscore the need to recognize community agency in managing flood risks and compensating for insufficient government support through solidarity and self-help. Policymakers can enhance flood management by incorporating these community-driven insights, fostering more effective, inclusive, and sustainable strategies that reflect the fluid, evolving relationships between government and communities.
“别说我们脆弱!”:重新思考洪水脆弱性和社区主导的治理
关于洪水脆弱性的传统观点往往把政府与社区的关系简单化,把社区描绘成被动的援助接受者。这种观点忽视了城市居民在塑造自身治理结构中的能动作用。最近的研究通过揭示社区如何积极管理洪水风险来挑战这种二元思维。然而,政府缺席与社区主导行动之间错综复杂的相互作用,以及它们在日常治理中的作用,仍未得到充分探讨。本文借鉴洪水脆弱性和社区主导治理方面的研究成果,采用访谈、焦点小组和“跟踪参与式观察”等方法,考察了阿克拉丹索曼地区易受洪水影响居民的经历和管理策略。三个关键的主题出现了:“预测和导航”,“合作和补偿”,以及“断裂和替换”。这些主题说明了居民如何默许、重新配置或挑战政府在洪水管理中的角色,通过社区主导的倡议建立自治。这些努力往往使社区恢复力合法化并得到加强,有时甚至会篡夺和取代国家权力。研究结果强调,有必要认识到社区机构在管理洪水风险方面的作用,并通过团结和自助来弥补政府支持不足。政策制定者可以通过纳入这些社区驱动的见解来加强洪水管理,培养更有效、更包容、更可持续的战略,这些战略反映了政府与社区之间不断变化、不断发展的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Urban Affairs
Journal of Urban Affairs URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Focusing on urban research and policy analysis, the Journal of Urban Affairs is among the most widely cited journals in the field. Published for the Urban Affairs Association, the journal offers multidisciplinary perspectives and explores issues of relevance to both scholars and practitioners, including: - Theoretical, conceptual, or methodological approaches to metropolitan and community problems - Empirical research that advances the understanding of society - Strategies for social change in the urban milieu - Innovative urban policies and programs - Issues of current interest to those who work in the field and those who study the urban and regional environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书