Rikke Eriksen, Kamilla Rognmo, Laila A Hopstock, James E McCutcheon
{"title":"Evidence for a protein leverage effect on food intake in a Norwegian population.","authors":"Rikke Eriksen, Kamilla Rognmo, Laila A Hopstock, James E McCutcheon","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2026.108581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this pre-registered study, we aimed to explore the protein leverage hypothesis in a general population, by studying the relationship between habitual dietary protein intake, total energy intake, and body mass index (BMI), and whether proportion of ultra-processed food (UPF) was associated with any of these variables. We used regression-based analyses to investigate these phenomena in cross-sectional data from a Norwegian population-based study, the seventh survey of Tromsø Study 2015-2016, (n = 11,152; 40-99 years). Total energy intake was negatively associated with proportion of dietary protein (L = -0.36, p < .001) and positively associated with dietary fat (L = 0.33, p < .001). Although we planned to test the relationship between BMI and dietary protein, there was no positive association between total energy intake and BMI meaning that these data were not suitable for testing an effect of protein leverage on BMI. Proportion of UPFs was positively associated with total energy intake (b = 554, p < .001), negatively associated with proportion of dietary protein (b = -2.0, p < .001), and positively associated with BMI (b = 0.011, p = .026). In summary, our study of middle-to-older aged Norwegians provides strong support for a protein leverage effect on energy intake.</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"108581"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2026.108581","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this pre-registered study, we aimed to explore the protein leverage hypothesis in a general population, by studying the relationship between habitual dietary protein intake, total energy intake, and body mass index (BMI), and whether proportion of ultra-processed food (UPF) was associated with any of these variables. We used regression-based analyses to investigate these phenomena in cross-sectional data from a Norwegian population-based study, the seventh survey of Tromsø Study 2015-2016, (n = 11,152; 40-99 years). Total energy intake was negatively associated with proportion of dietary protein (L = -0.36, p < .001) and positively associated with dietary fat (L = 0.33, p < .001). Although we planned to test the relationship between BMI and dietary protein, there was no positive association between total energy intake and BMI meaning that these data were not suitable for testing an effect of protein leverage on BMI. Proportion of UPFs was positively associated with total energy intake (b = 554, p < .001), negatively associated with proportion of dietary protein (b = -2.0, p < .001), and positively associated with BMI (b = 0.011, p = .026). In summary, our study of middle-to-older aged Norwegians provides strong support for a protein leverage effect on energy intake.
期刊介绍:
Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.