{"title":"Threshold optimization in separating cortical and extracerebral hemodynamics using principal component analysis.","authors":"Wakana Kawai, Kazuki Hyodo, Yuki Yamamoto, Tatsuya Hayashi, Daisuke Yamaguchi, Aiko Ueno, Simone Cutini, Ippeita Dan","doi":"10.3389/fnhum.2026.1778201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>When trying to differentiate between hemodynamic cortical and extracerebral signals identified by devices used to detect cortical activity, statistical methods such as principal component analysis (PCA) are commonly employed as alternative approaches to using short separation measurements to reduce the influence of extracerebral hemodynamics. PCA requires a threshold value to separate cortical and extracerebral signals; however, existing methods often rely on fixed thresholds that fail to account for inter-individual variability and differences in experimental design, potentially leading to over- or under-correction. Rather than introducing a novel extracerebral hemodynamics removal method, the present study aims to optimize the use of existing methodologies. Specifically, we proposed a method to optimize the threshold that differentiates cortical from extracerebral hemodynamics in PCA-based analyses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Each of the four analyses were applied to a dataset obtained from older participants performing a verbal n-back task: (1) no correction (NC), (2) short separation regression (SSR), (3) PCA with our proposed threshold optimization (PCA<sub>opt</sub>), and (4) PCA with the individual maximum as threshold (PCA<sub>max</sub>). Bayesian <i>t</i>-tests were then conducted to evaluate the equivalence between SSR and PCA<sub>opt</sub>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NC displayed the strongest cortical activation, PCA<sub>max</sub> the weakest. SSR and PCA<sub>opt</sub> produced intermediate results, and Bayesian t-tests revealed that the BF<sub>01</sub> values for most of the channels were greater than 3.0, whereas no channels exhibited corresponding BF<sub>10</sub> values exceeding 3.0.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Optimizing the threshold for separating cortical and extracerebral hemodynamics is a practical and effective strategy when using PCA as an alternative to short-separation measurements. This approach enables appropriate correction even in the absence of short-separation channels.</p>","PeriodicalId":12536,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","volume":"20 ","pages":"1778201"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13143948/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2026.1778201","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: When trying to differentiate between hemodynamic cortical and extracerebral signals identified by devices used to detect cortical activity, statistical methods such as principal component analysis (PCA) are commonly employed as alternative approaches to using short separation measurements to reduce the influence of extracerebral hemodynamics. PCA requires a threshold value to separate cortical and extracerebral signals; however, existing methods often rely on fixed thresholds that fail to account for inter-individual variability and differences in experimental design, potentially leading to over- or under-correction. Rather than introducing a novel extracerebral hemodynamics removal method, the present study aims to optimize the use of existing methodologies. Specifically, we proposed a method to optimize the threshold that differentiates cortical from extracerebral hemodynamics in PCA-based analyses.
Methods: Each of the four analyses were applied to a dataset obtained from older participants performing a verbal n-back task: (1) no correction (NC), (2) short separation regression (SSR), (3) PCA with our proposed threshold optimization (PCAopt), and (4) PCA with the individual maximum as threshold (PCAmax). Bayesian t-tests were then conducted to evaluate the equivalence between SSR and PCAopt.
Results: NC displayed the strongest cortical activation, PCAmax the weakest. SSR and PCAopt produced intermediate results, and Bayesian t-tests revealed that the BF01 values for most of the channels were greater than 3.0, whereas no channels exhibited corresponding BF10 values exceeding 3.0.
Discussion: Optimizing the threshold for separating cortical and extracerebral hemodynamics is a practical and effective strategy when using PCA as an alternative to short-separation measurements. This approach enables appropriate correction even in the absence of short-separation channels.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience is a first-tier electronic journal devoted to understanding the brain mechanisms supporting cognitive and social behavior in humans, and how these mechanisms might be altered in disease states. The last 25 years have seen an explosive growth in both the methods and the theoretical constructs available to study the human brain. Advances in electrophysiological, neuroimaging, neuropsychological, psychophysical, neuropharmacological and computational approaches have provided key insights into the mechanisms of a broad range of human behaviors in both health and disease. Work in human neuroscience ranges from the cognitive domain, including areas such as memory, attention, language and perception to the social domain, with this last subject addressing topics, such as interpersonal interactions, social discourse and emotional regulation. How these processes unfold during development, mature in adulthood and often decline in aging, and how they are altered in a host of developmental, neurological and psychiatric disorders, has become increasingly amenable to human neuroscience research approaches. Work in human neuroscience has influenced many areas of inquiry ranging from social and cognitive psychology to economics, law and public policy. Accordingly, our journal will provide a forum for human research spanning all areas of human cognitive, social, developmental and translational neuroscience using any research approach.