Threshold optimization in separating cortical and extracerebral hemodynamics using principal component analysis.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience Pub Date : 2026-04-22 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2026.1778201
Wakana Kawai, Kazuki Hyodo, Yuki Yamamoto, Tatsuya Hayashi, Daisuke Yamaguchi, Aiko Ueno, Simone Cutini, Ippeita Dan
{"title":"Threshold optimization in separating cortical and extracerebral hemodynamics using principal component analysis.","authors":"Wakana Kawai, Kazuki Hyodo, Yuki Yamamoto, Tatsuya Hayashi, Daisuke Yamaguchi, Aiko Ueno, Simone Cutini, Ippeita Dan","doi":"10.3389/fnhum.2026.1778201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>When trying to differentiate between hemodynamic cortical and extracerebral signals identified by devices used to detect cortical activity, statistical methods such as principal component analysis (PCA) are commonly employed as alternative approaches to using short separation measurements to reduce the influence of extracerebral hemodynamics. PCA requires a threshold value to separate cortical and extracerebral signals; however, existing methods often rely on fixed thresholds that fail to account for inter-individual variability and differences in experimental design, potentially leading to over- or under-correction. Rather than introducing a novel extracerebral hemodynamics removal method, the present study aims to optimize the use of existing methodologies. Specifically, we proposed a method to optimize the threshold that differentiates cortical from extracerebral hemodynamics in PCA-based analyses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Each of the four analyses were applied to a dataset obtained from older participants performing a verbal n-back task: (1) no correction (NC), (2) short separation regression (SSR), (3) PCA with our proposed threshold optimization (PCA<sub>opt</sub>), and (4) PCA with the individual maximum as threshold (PCA<sub>max</sub>). Bayesian <i>t</i>-tests were then conducted to evaluate the equivalence between SSR and PCA<sub>opt</sub>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NC displayed the strongest cortical activation, PCA<sub>max</sub> the weakest. SSR and PCA<sub>opt</sub> produced intermediate results, and Bayesian t-tests revealed that the BF<sub>01</sub> values for most of the channels were greater than 3.0, whereas no channels exhibited corresponding BF<sub>10</sub> values exceeding 3.0.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Optimizing the threshold for separating cortical and extracerebral hemodynamics is a practical and effective strategy when using PCA as an alternative to short-separation measurements. This approach enables appropriate correction even in the absence of short-separation channels.</p>","PeriodicalId":12536,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","volume":"20 ","pages":"1778201"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13143948/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2026.1778201","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: When trying to differentiate between hemodynamic cortical and extracerebral signals identified by devices used to detect cortical activity, statistical methods such as principal component analysis (PCA) are commonly employed as alternative approaches to using short separation measurements to reduce the influence of extracerebral hemodynamics. PCA requires a threshold value to separate cortical and extracerebral signals; however, existing methods often rely on fixed thresholds that fail to account for inter-individual variability and differences in experimental design, potentially leading to over- or under-correction. Rather than introducing a novel extracerebral hemodynamics removal method, the present study aims to optimize the use of existing methodologies. Specifically, we proposed a method to optimize the threshold that differentiates cortical from extracerebral hemodynamics in PCA-based analyses.

Methods: Each of the four analyses were applied to a dataset obtained from older participants performing a verbal n-back task: (1) no correction (NC), (2) short separation regression (SSR), (3) PCA with our proposed threshold optimization (PCAopt), and (4) PCA with the individual maximum as threshold (PCAmax). Bayesian t-tests were then conducted to evaluate the equivalence between SSR and PCAopt.

Results: NC displayed the strongest cortical activation, PCAmax the weakest. SSR and PCAopt produced intermediate results, and Bayesian t-tests revealed that the BF01 values for most of the channels were greater than 3.0, whereas no channels exhibited corresponding BF10 values exceeding 3.0.

Discussion: Optimizing the threshold for separating cortical and extracerebral hemodynamics is a practical and effective strategy when using PCA as an alternative to short-separation measurements. This approach enables appropriate correction even in the absence of short-separation channels.

应用主成分分析分离皮层和脑外血流动力学的阈值优化。
当试图区分由用于检测皮层活动的设备识别的皮层和脑外血流动力学信号时,通常采用统计方法,如主成分分析(PCA)作为替代方法,使用短分离测量来减少脑外血流动力学的影响。PCA需要一个阈值来分离皮层信号和脑外信号;然而,现有的方法往往依赖于固定的阈值,不能解释个体间的差异和实验设计的差异,可能导致过度或不足的校正。本研究的目的不是介绍一种新的脑外血流动力学去除方法,而是优化现有方法的使用。具体来说,我们提出了一种方法来优化在基于pca的分析中区分皮层和脑外血流动力学的阈值。方法:四种分析分别应用于从执行口头n-back任务的老年参与者获得的数据集:(1)不校正(NC),(2)短分离回归(SSR),(3)采用我们提出的阈值优化的PCA (PCAopt),以及(4)以个体最大值为阈值的PCA (PCAmax)。然后进行贝叶斯t检验来评估SSR与PCAopt之间的等价性。结果:NC脑皮层活化最强,PCAmax脑皮层活化最弱。SSR和PCAopt得到的是中间结果,贝叶斯t检验显示,大多数通道的BF01值大于3.0,没有通道相应的BF10值超过3.0。讨论:当使用PCA作为短期分离测量的替代方案时,优化分离皮质和脑外血流动力学的阈值是一种实用而有效的策略。这种方法即使在没有短分离通道的情况下也能进行适当的校正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
830
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience is a first-tier electronic journal devoted to understanding the brain mechanisms supporting cognitive and social behavior in humans, and how these mechanisms might be altered in disease states. The last 25 years have seen an explosive growth in both the methods and the theoretical constructs available to study the human brain. Advances in electrophysiological, neuroimaging, neuropsychological, psychophysical, neuropharmacological and computational approaches have provided key insights into the mechanisms of a broad range of human behaviors in both health and disease. Work in human neuroscience ranges from the cognitive domain, including areas such as memory, attention, language and perception to the social domain, with this last subject addressing topics, such as interpersonal interactions, social discourse and emotional regulation. How these processes unfold during development, mature in adulthood and often decline in aging, and how they are altered in a host of developmental, neurological and psychiatric disorders, has become increasingly amenable to human neuroscience research approaches. Work in human neuroscience has influenced many areas of inquiry ranging from social and cognitive psychology to economics, law and public policy. Accordingly, our journal will provide a forum for human research spanning all areas of human cognitive, social, developmental and translational neuroscience using any research approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书