Developing and Applying a Typology of 'Better for You' Claims on Alcohol Products.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Asad Yusoff, Simone Pettigrew, Bella Sträuli, Paula O'Brien, Jacqueline Bowden, Mark Petticrew, Alexandra Jones
{"title":"Developing and Applying a Typology of 'Better for You' Claims on Alcohol Products.","authors":"Asad Yusoff, Simone Pettigrew, Bella Sträuli, Paula O'Brien, Jacqueline Bowden, Mark Petticrew, Alexandra Jones","doi":"10.1111/dar.70163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To appeal to health-conscious consumers, alcohol producers are marketing products with a range of 'better for you' claims. This study aims to: (i) develop a typology of text-based 'better for you' claims used on alcohol products; (ii) assess the prevalence of these claims in the Australian market overall and by alcohol category; and (iii) identify the extent to which products display multiple claims.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between March and November 2024, images of 5982 unique alcohol products were captured in-store from three retailers in Australia. The products were coded for presence and type of 'better for you' claims, with each claim classified into an emergent typology of categories. Descriptive analyses were conducted overall and by alcohol category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight major categories of claims were identified: nutrient content, energy content, absence of ingredient, low alcohol, fruit/botanical references, natural, processing and vegan claims. Across the sample, 35% of products displayed at least one claim (range: 1-9 claims), and one in eight displayed multiple claims. Cider (91%) and premix (75%) categories contained the highest proportion of products featuring at least one claim.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>The use of claims across the Australian alcohol market appears to be quite common, particularly on premix and cider products. Limited regulation of claims allows companies to portray products as 'better for you', potentially misleading consumers and taking advantage of their efforts to be health-conscious. Future work in Australia should prioritise developing policies that restrict the use of claims on alcohol products, particularly those shown to be misleading.</p>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":"45 4","pages":"e70163"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13135123/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.70163","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To appeal to health-conscious consumers, alcohol producers are marketing products with a range of 'better for you' claims. This study aims to: (i) develop a typology of text-based 'better for you' claims used on alcohol products; (ii) assess the prevalence of these claims in the Australian market overall and by alcohol category; and (iii) identify the extent to which products display multiple claims.

Methods: Between March and November 2024, images of 5982 unique alcohol products were captured in-store from three retailers in Australia. The products were coded for presence and type of 'better for you' claims, with each claim classified into an emergent typology of categories. Descriptive analyses were conducted overall and by alcohol category.

Results: Eight major categories of claims were identified: nutrient content, energy content, absence of ingredient, low alcohol, fruit/botanical references, natural, processing and vegan claims. Across the sample, 35% of products displayed at least one claim (range: 1-9 claims), and one in eight displayed multiple claims. Cider (91%) and premix (75%) categories contained the highest proportion of products featuring at least one claim.

Discussion and conclusions: The use of claims across the Australian alcohol market appears to be quite common, particularly on premix and cider products. Limited regulation of claims allows companies to portray products as 'better for you', potentially misleading consumers and taking advantage of their efforts to be health-conscious. Future work in Australia should prioritise developing policies that restrict the use of claims on alcohol products, particularly those shown to be misleading.

开发和应用酒精产品的“对你更好”声明类型。
导言:为了吸引注重健康的消费者,酒类生产商正在推销一系列“对你更有益”的产品。本研究旨在:(i)开发一种用于酒精产品的基于文本的“对你更好”声明的类型学;(二)评估这些声明在澳大利亚市场的总体流行程度和按酒精类别分列的情况;以及(iii)确定产品显示多重声明的程度。方法:在2024年3月至11月期间,从澳大利亚的三家零售商那里捕获了5982种独特的酒精产品的图像。这些产品根据“对你更好”的声明的存在和类型进行了编码,每个声明都被分类为一个紧急的类别类型。描述性分析进行了总体和酒精类别。结果:确定了八个主要类别的声明:营养含量,能量含量,不含成分,低酒精,水果/植物参考,天然,加工和纯素声明。在整个样本中,35%的产品至少显示了一项声明(范围:1-9项),八分之一的产品显示了多项声明。苹果酒(91%)和预混酒(75%)类别包含至少一种声称的产品比例最高。讨论和结论:在澳大利亚酒类市场上使用索赔似乎相当普遍,特别是在预混料和苹果酒产品上。对声称的有限监管允许公司将产品描述为“对你更好”,这可能会误导消费者,并利用他们的健康意识。澳大利亚今后的工作应优先制定政策,限制使用酒精产品的声明,特别是那些被证明具有误导性的声明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol review
Drug and alcohol review SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书