Healthy beverages in a sugary world: Dutch adolescents' perspectives on water and other healthy beverages; a qualitative multi-method study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Rian Pepping, Vincent Busch, Juliette Lukowski, Arnoud Verhoeff, Jacob C Seidell, Barbara Groot-Sluijsmans
{"title":"Healthy beverages in a sugary world: Dutch adolescents' perspectives on water and other healthy beverages; a qualitative multi-method study.","authors":"Rian Pepping, Vincent Busch, Juliette Lukowski, Arnoud Verhoeff, Jacob C Seidell, Barbara Groot-Sluijsmans","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2026.108567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite extensive research on adolescents' sugar-sweetened beverage consumption, little is known about their perceptions, barriers and facilitators in relation to healthier beverages. The aim of this study is twofold: (1) to explore how adolescents conceptualise healthy beverages; (2) to gain a holistic understanding of the lived experiences that shape their behaviour with respect to healthy beverages. We used a qualitative multi-method approach, combining street intercept interviews, an interactive group session, and semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Sixty Dutch adolescents (aged 12-16) attending pre-vocational secondary schools were recruited using a combination of convenience and purposive sampling. Data were collected from April to June 2025 in the Netherlands, both online and in person, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis Dutch teenagers perceived water as the healthiest, while energy drinks and regular soft drinks were identified as unhealthy. Confusion persisted about the safety or the health effects of tap water, fruit juices and artificially sweetened beverages. This was fuelled largely by online influencers and marketing strategies. Adolescents struggled to identify truly healthy beverages due to grey areas, rumours, and mis- and disinformation, often amplified by platforms like TikTok. Scepticism about tap water safety and confusion about fruit juices further clouds their perceptions. Clear, consistent and discerning communication from scientific, governmental and public health organisations, along with stricter marketing regulations and strategies to counter misinformation, is essential to support young people in making healthier beverage choices. Additionally, there is a clear need for a broader range of healthy beverages that genuinely meet adolescent preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"108567"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2026.108567","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite extensive research on adolescents' sugar-sweetened beverage consumption, little is known about their perceptions, barriers and facilitators in relation to healthier beverages. The aim of this study is twofold: (1) to explore how adolescents conceptualise healthy beverages; (2) to gain a holistic understanding of the lived experiences that shape their behaviour with respect to healthy beverages. We used a qualitative multi-method approach, combining street intercept interviews, an interactive group session, and semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Sixty Dutch adolescents (aged 12-16) attending pre-vocational secondary schools were recruited using a combination of convenience and purposive sampling. Data were collected from April to June 2025 in the Netherlands, both online and in person, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis Dutch teenagers perceived water as the healthiest, while energy drinks and regular soft drinks were identified as unhealthy. Confusion persisted about the safety or the health effects of tap water, fruit juices and artificially sweetened beverages. This was fuelled largely by online influencers and marketing strategies. Adolescents struggled to identify truly healthy beverages due to grey areas, rumours, and mis- and disinformation, often amplified by platforms like TikTok. Scepticism about tap water safety and confusion about fruit juices further clouds their perceptions. Clear, consistent and discerning communication from scientific, governmental and public health organisations, along with stricter marketing regulations and strategies to counter misinformation, is essential to support young people in making healthier beverage choices. Additionally, there is a clear need for a broader range of healthy beverages that genuinely meet adolescent preferences.

含糖世界中的健康饮料:荷兰青少年对水和其他健康饮料的看法多方法定性研究。
尽管对青少年的含糖饮料消费进行了广泛的研究,但对他们对健康饮料的看法、障碍和促进因素知之甚少。本研究的目的是双重的:(1)探讨青少年如何概念化健康饮料;(2)全面了解影响他们对健康饮料行为的生活经历。我们使用了定性的多方法方法,结合了街头拦截访谈、互动小组会议和半结构化的深度访谈。采用方便抽样和目的抽样相结合的方法,招募了60名在职业前中学就读的荷兰青少年(12-16岁)。研究人员从2025年4月到6月在荷兰收集了数据,包括在线和面对面的数据,并使用反身性主题分析进行了分析。荷兰青少年认为水是最健康的,而能量饮料和普通软饮料被认为是不健康的。关于自来水、果汁和人工加糖饮料的安全性或健康影响的困惑仍然存在。这在很大程度上是由网络影响者和营销策略推动的。由于灰色地带、谣言、错误和虚假信息的存在,青少年很难识别出真正健康的饮料,而这些信息往往被TikTok等平台放大。对自来水安全的怀疑和对果汁的困惑进一步蒙蔽了他们的观念。来自科学、政府和公共卫生组织的清晰、一致和敏锐的沟通,以及更严格的营销法规和反击错误信息的策略,对于支持年轻人选择更健康的饮料至关重要。此外,显然需要更广泛的健康饮料,真正满足青少年的喜好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书