Training Teachers for Self-Regulated Learning: A Structured Narrative Review.

IF 2.6 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Lucía Poladura, Elena Blanco, Ellián Tuero, Celestino Rodríguez, José Carlos Núñez
{"title":"Training Teachers for Self-Regulated Learning: A Structured Narrative Review.","authors":"Lucía Poladura, Elena Blanco, Ellián Tuero, Celestino Rodríguez, José Carlos Núñez","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe16040055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This structured narrative review aimed to synthesize the findings of various studies to determine the efficacy of Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) training programs for in-service and pre-service teachers on their knowledge and skills, and to evaluate the transfer to teaching practice and student outcomes. Following PRISMA guidelines, a search was conducted across Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycInfo, ultimately including 30 intervention studies. The results confirmed that professional development is effective in enhancing teachers' knowledge, skills, and beliefs related to SRL. However, due to wide methodological diversity, the review identified varied intervention factors showing promise, but a unified association between sample type (in-service vs. pre-service) and overall impact was unattainable. While SRL training successfully improves teacher competency, the limited evaluation of student performance or long-term effects prevents the definitive claim that the training reliably changes teaching practice toward a more self-regulated approach. Future research should prioritize robust longitudinal designs and include student-level measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"16 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13114369/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe16040055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This structured narrative review aimed to synthesize the findings of various studies to determine the efficacy of Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) training programs for in-service and pre-service teachers on their knowledge and skills, and to evaluate the transfer to teaching practice and student outcomes. Following PRISMA guidelines, a search was conducted across Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycInfo, ultimately including 30 intervention studies. The results confirmed that professional development is effective in enhancing teachers' knowledge, skills, and beliefs related to SRL. However, due to wide methodological diversity, the review identified varied intervention factors showing promise, but a unified association between sample type (in-service vs. pre-service) and overall impact was unattainable. While SRL training successfully improves teacher competency, the limited evaluation of student performance or long-term effects prevents the definitive claim that the training reliably changes teaching practice toward a more self-regulated approach. Future research should prioritize robust longitudinal designs and include student-level measures.

培养教师自主学习:一种结构化的叙事回顾。
本研究旨在综合各种研究的结果,以确定在职和职前教师自我调节学习(SRL)培训计划对其知识和技能的效果,并评估其向教学实践和学生成果的转移。按照PRISMA的指导方针,在Web of Science、Scopus和PsycInfo上进行了搜索,最终包括30项干预研究。研究结果证实,专业发展能有效提升教师的专业学习知识、技能和信念。然而,由于方法的广泛多样性,该综述确定了各种有希望的干预因素,但样本类型(在职与职前)与总体影响之间的统一关联是无法实现的。虽然SRL培训成功地提高了教师的能力,但对学生表现或长期效果的有限评估阻碍了明确声称培训可靠地将教学实践转变为更自我调节的方法。未来的研究应优先考虑稳健的纵向设计,并包括学生水平的测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
111
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书