Risk of Cognitive Decline in Professional Soccer Players after Repetitive Subconcussive Impacts: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Tomasz Tykocki
{"title":"Risk of Cognitive Decline in Professional Soccer Players after Repetitive Subconcussive Impacts: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Tomasz Tykocki","doi":"10.2176/jns-nmc.2025-0451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Repetitive soccer heading has been implicated as a potential source of cumulative subconcussive brain injury, yet the magnitude and consistency of its cognitive effects remain incompletely defined. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify global and domain-specific cognitive outcomes associated with repetitive heading exposure. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through December 2025. Of 2,846 identified records, 46 studies met the inclusion criteria, and 28 provided standardized cognitive data suitable for quantitative synthesis. Effect sizes (Hedges g, Fisher z) were transformed into log odds ratios and pooled using DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using Q, I<sup>2</sup>, and H<sup>2</sup> statistics, and publication bias was evaluated with funnel plots, Egger regression, and trim-and-fill procedures, alongside leave-one-out influence analyses. Across 28 independent author-level datasets, repetitive heading was associated with significantly increased odds of global cognitive underperformance (odds ratio 1.67; 95% confidence interval 1.61-1.72), with moderate heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> ≈ 34%). Trim-and-fill adjustment yielded a modestly attenuated but still significant estimate (odds ratio 1.49). Domain-level analyses demonstrated consistent impairments across visuospatial ability (odds ratio 1.49), verbal memory (odds ratio 1.62), attention (odds ratio 1.71), processing speed (odds ratio 1.64), executive function (odds ratio 1.86), and composite cognition (odds ratio 1.58). Confidence intervals were narrow, once, and the effect directionality was uniform across domains. These findings indicate that repetitive soccer heading is associated with robust, reproducible cognitive deficits across multiple cognitive systems, supporting cumulative subconcussive exposure as an independent risk factor for measurable cognitive decline.</p>","PeriodicalId":19225,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2025-0451","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Repetitive soccer heading has been implicated as a potential source of cumulative subconcussive brain injury, yet the magnitude and consistency of its cognitive effects remain incompletely defined. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify global and domain-specific cognitive outcomes associated with repetitive heading exposure. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through December 2025. Of 2,846 identified records, 46 studies met the inclusion criteria, and 28 provided standardized cognitive data suitable for quantitative synthesis. Effect sizes (Hedges g, Fisher z) were transformed into log odds ratios and pooled using DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using Q, I2, and H2 statistics, and publication bias was evaluated with funnel plots, Egger regression, and trim-and-fill procedures, alongside leave-one-out influence analyses. Across 28 independent author-level datasets, repetitive heading was associated with significantly increased odds of global cognitive underperformance (odds ratio 1.67; 95% confidence interval 1.61-1.72), with moderate heterogeneity (I2 ≈ 34%). Trim-and-fill adjustment yielded a modestly attenuated but still significant estimate (odds ratio 1.49). Domain-level analyses demonstrated consistent impairments across visuospatial ability (odds ratio 1.49), verbal memory (odds ratio 1.62), attention (odds ratio 1.71), processing speed (odds ratio 1.64), executive function (odds ratio 1.86), and composite cognition (odds ratio 1.58). Confidence intervals were narrow, once, and the effect directionality was uniform across domains. These findings indicate that repetitive soccer heading is associated with robust, reproducible cognitive deficits across multiple cognitive systems, supporting cumulative subconcussive exposure as an independent risk factor for measurable cognitive decline.

职业足球运动员重复次脑震荡后认知能力下降的风险:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
重复的足球头球被认为是累积性脑震荡脑损伤的潜在来源,但其认知影响的程度和一致性仍未完全确定。我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以量化与重复头球暴露相关的全球和特定领域的认知结果。根据系统评价和元分析2020指南的首选报告项目,检索了PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus和Web of Science,直到2025年12月。在2846份已确定的记录中,46项研究符合纳入标准,28项研究提供了适合定量合成的标准化认知数据。效应大小(Hedges g, Fisher z)被转换成对数比值比,并使用dersimonan - laird随机效应模型进行汇总。异质性评估采用Q、I2和H2统计,发表偏倚评估采用漏斗图、Egger回归和修正填充程序,以及遗漏影响分析。在28个独立作者水平的数据集中,重复标题与整体认知表现不佳的几率显著增加相关(优势比1.67;95%置信区间1.61-1.72),具有中等异质性(I2≈34%)。调整产生了适度衰减但仍然显著的估计值(优势比1.49)。领域水平分析显示,视觉空间能力(比值比1.49)、言语记忆(比值比1.62)、注意力(比值比1.71)、处理速度(比值比1.64)、执行功能(比值比1.86)和综合认知(比值比1.58)均存在一致的损害。置信区间很窄,只有一次,而且效应的方向性在各个领域是一致的。这些发现表明,在多个认知系统中,重复的足球头球与强大的、可重复的认知缺陷有关,支持累积的次震荡暴露是可测量的认知能力下降的独立风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurologia medico-chirurgica
Neurologia medico-chirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
63
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书