Pharmacological blood-pressure lowering for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and death across the full spectrum of chronic kidney disease severity: an individual-participant data meta-analysis.

Guyu Zeng,Zeinab Bidel,Qianqian Yang,Dexter Canoy,Mark Woodward,Julia Lewis,Sverre E Kjeldsen,William C Cushman,Jinqing Yuan,Koon Teo,Barry R Davis,John Chalmers,Carl J Pepine,Kazem Rahimi,Milad Nazarzadeh,
{"title":"Pharmacological blood-pressure lowering for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and death across the full spectrum of chronic kidney disease severity: an individual-participant data meta-analysis.","authors":"Guyu Zeng,Zeinab Bidel,Qianqian Yang,Dexter Canoy,Mark Woodward,Julia Lewis,Sverre E Kjeldsen,William C Cushman,Jinqing Yuan,Koon Teo,Barry R Davis,John Chalmers,Carl J Pepine,Kazem Rahimi,Milad Nazarzadeh, ","doi":"10.1016/s0140-6736(26)00367-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nIndividuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly those at more advanced stages, have been systematically under-represented in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of blood-pressure-lowering treatment due to safety concerns, leading to a persistent paucity of evidence for cardiovascular risk management in this high-risk group. We investigated the effect of blood-pressure-lowering treatment on the risk of major cardiovascular disease and death across the full spectrum of CKD stages and by key clinical subgroups.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe conducted a one-stage meta-analysis of individual-participant data from RCTs in which participants were randomly assigned to a blood-pressure-lowering therapy versus a comparator. We used RCTs collated in the Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration dataset, published at any time in any language, which were eligible for inclusion if they had at least 1000 person-years of follow-up per arm, baseline blood-pressure and creatinine measurements, and time-to-event outcomes; those with unclear randomisation procedures or restricted to heart failure or acute care settings were excluded. Participants with a documented history of heart failure or extreme creatinine values were excluded. No age criteria were applied. The primary outcome was major cardiovascular events, defined as a composite of fatal or non-fatal stroke, ischaemic heart disease, or hospitalisation for, or death from, heart failure. Relative treatment effects were estimated with a stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Heterogeneity of treatment effects was evaluated across prespecified subgroups defined by CKD status, CKD stage (1-5), diabetes, proteinuria, and baseline blood pressure. A stratified network meta-analysis was performed to examine whether treatment effects differed by defined subgroups within each of five principal antihypertensive drug classes. The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018099283).\r\n\r\nFINDINGS\r\nFrom 52 RCTs (363 684 participants), a total of 285 124 participants from 46 randomised trials met the eligibility criteria; 116 145 (40·7%) were women, 168 979 (59·3%) were men, 59 185 (20·7%) had CKD at baseline, and 86 067 (30·2%) had type 2 diabetes. During a median follow-up of 4·4 years (IQR 3·2-5·1), a 5 mm Hg reduction in systolic blood pressure reduced the risk of major cardiovascular disease in individuals with CKD (hazard ratio [HR] 0·91 [95% CI 0·87-0·94]) and without CKD (0·90 [0·88-0·93]; pinteraction>0·99). Furthermore, these observed relative risk reductions were consistent across all CKD stages, including severe stages 4-5 (pinteraction>0·99). Similar treatment effects were observed by proteinuria status and across blood-pressure categories, down to <120/70 mm Hg. However, the relative treatment effect in individuals with CKD was notably attenuated among those with coexisting diabetes (HR 0·96 [95% CI 0·90-1·02]) compared with those without (0·88 [0·84-0·93]; pinteraction=0·044). The stratified analysis within each drug class showed that the class-specific effects of antihypertensive agents versus placebo on cardiovascular disease risk remained unchanged across the investigated subgroups.\r\n\r\nINTERPRETATION\r\nIn the context of cardiovascular risk reduction, the relative benefit of blood-pressure lowering in patients with CKD is similar to that in individuals without CKD, with consistent efficacy across all CKD stages, blood-pressure thresholds, and proteinuria status. However, notably, this relative benefit is attenuated in patients with CKD and concomitant diabetes, underscoring the requirement for adapted therapeutic strategies in this high-risk subgroup. Moreover, the class-specific effects of principal antihypertensives in CKD mirror those observed in the broader population, independent of CKD stage or proteinuria status.\r\n\r\nFUNDING\r\nBritish Heart Foundation.","PeriodicalId":22898,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet","volume":"1 1","pages":"1626-1638"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(26)00367-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly those at more advanced stages, have been systematically under-represented in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of blood-pressure-lowering treatment due to safety concerns, leading to a persistent paucity of evidence for cardiovascular risk management in this high-risk group. We investigated the effect of blood-pressure-lowering treatment on the risk of major cardiovascular disease and death across the full spectrum of CKD stages and by key clinical subgroups. METHODS We conducted a one-stage meta-analysis of individual-participant data from RCTs in which participants were randomly assigned to a blood-pressure-lowering therapy versus a comparator. We used RCTs collated in the Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration dataset, published at any time in any language, which were eligible for inclusion if they had at least 1000 person-years of follow-up per arm, baseline blood-pressure and creatinine measurements, and time-to-event outcomes; those with unclear randomisation procedures or restricted to heart failure or acute care settings were excluded. Participants with a documented history of heart failure or extreme creatinine values were excluded. No age criteria were applied. The primary outcome was major cardiovascular events, defined as a composite of fatal or non-fatal stroke, ischaemic heart disease, or hospitalisation for, or death from, heart failure. Relative treatment effects were estimated with a stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Heterogeneity of treatment effects was evaluated across prespecified subgroups defined by CKD status, CKD stage (1-5), diabetes, proteinuria, and baseline blood pressure. A stratified network meta-analysis was performed to examine whether treatment effects differed by defined subgroups within each of five principal antihypertensive drug classes. The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018099283). FINDINGS From 52 RCTs (363 684 participants), a total of 285 124 participants from 46 randomised trials met the eligibility criteria; 116 145 (40·7%) were women, 168 979 (59·3%) were men, 59 185 (20·7%) had CKD at baseline, and 86 067 (30·2%) had type 2 diabetes. During a median follow-up of 4·4 years (IQR 3·2-5·1), a 5 mm Hg reduction in systolic blood pressure reduced the risk of major cardiovascular disease in individuals with CKD (hazard ratio [HR] 0·91 [95% CI 0·87-0·94]) and without CKD (0·90 [0·88-0·93]; pinteraction>0·99). Furthermore, these observed relative risk reductions were consistent across all CKD stages, including severe stages 4-5 (pinteraction>0·99). Similar treatment effects were observed by proteinuria status and across blood-pressure categories, down to <120/70 mm Hg. However, the relative treatment effect in individuals with CKD was notably attenuated among those with coexisting diabetes (HR 0·96 [95% CI 0·90-1·02]) compared with those without (0·88 [0·84-0·93]; pinteraction=0·044). The stratified analysis within each drug class showed that the class-specific effects of antihypertensive agents versus placebo on cardiovascular disease risk remained unchanged across the investigated subgroups. INTERPRETATION In the context of cardiovascular risk reduction, the relative benefit of blood-pressure lowering in patients with CKD is similar to that in individuals without CKD, with consistent efficacy across all CKD stages, blood-pressure thresholds, and proteinuria status. However, notably, this relative benefit is attenuated in patients with CKD and concomitant diabetes, underscoring the requirement for adapted therapeutic strategies in this high-risk subgroup. Moreover, the class-specific effects of principal antihypertensives in CKD mirror those observed in the broader population, independent of CKD stage or proteinuria status. FUNDING British Heart Foundation.
药物降压预防心血管疾病和慢性肾脏疾病严重程度的死亡:一项个体参与者数据荟萃分析
背景:慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者,特别是晚期患者,由于安全性考虑,在降压治疗的随机对照试验(rct)中被系统性地低估,导致这一高危人群心血管风险管理的证据持续缺乏。我们调查了降压治疗对全CKD分期和关键临床亚组主要心血管疾病和死亡风险的影响。方法:我们对来自随机对照试验的个体参与者数据进行了一项单阶段荟萃分析,其中参与者被随机分配到降压治疗组与比较组。我们使用了在任何时间以任何语言发表的降血压治疗试验者协作数据集中整理的随机对照试验,如果他们每组至少有1000人年的随访,基线血压和肌酐测量,以及事件发生时间结果,则有资格纳入;那些随机化程序不明确或仅限于心力衰竭或急性护理的患者被排除在外。有心力衰竭病史或肌酐值过高的受试者被排除在外。没有适用年龄标准。主要终点是主要心血管事件,定义为致命性或非致命性中风、缺血性心脏病、因心力衰竭住院或因心力衰竭死亡的复合事件。采用分层Cox比例风险模型估计相对治疗效果。通过CKD状态、CKD分期(1-5)、糖尿病、蛋白尿和基线血压等预先指定的亚组来评估治疗效果的异质性。采用分层网络荟萃分析来检验五种主要抗高血压药物类别中不同亚组的治疗效果是否不同。该系统评价已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42018099283)。结果:52项随机对照试验(363 684名受试者)中,46项随机试验共有285 124名受试者符合入选标准;116 145名(40.7%)女性,168 979名(59.3%)男性,59 185名(20.7%)基线时患有CKD, 86 067名(30.2%)患有2型糖尿病。在中位随访4年(IQR为3.5 - 5.1)期间,收缩压降低5毫米汞柱可降低CKD患者发生主要心血管疾病的风险(风险比[HR] 0.91 [95% CI 0.87 - 0.94])和非CKD患者(风险比[HR] 0.90[0.88 - 0.93];相互作用> . 0.99)。此外,这些观察到的相对风险降低在所有CKD阶段都是一致的,包括严重的4-5期(p相互作用b> 0·99)。蛋白尿状态和不同血压类别均观察到类似的治疗效果,降至<120/70 mm Hg。然而,与非糖尿病患者相比,CKD患者的相对治疗效果明显减弱(HR 0.96 [95% CI 0.90 -1·02])(HR 0.88 [0.84 - 0.93]; p相互作用= 0.044)。每个药物类别的分层分析显示,在调查的亚组中,降压药与安慰剂对心血管疾病风险的类别特异性作用保持不变。在降低心血管风险的背景下,CKD患者降压的相对益处与非CKD患者相似,在所有CKD分期、血压阈值和蛋白尿状态下均具有一致的疗效。然而,值得注意的是,在CKD合并糖尿病患者中,这种相对获益减弱,这强调了在这一高危亚组中需要适应的治疗策略。此外,CKD中主要抗高血压药物的类别特异性作用反映了在更广泛人群中观察到的效果,与CKD分期或蛋白尿状态无关。资助英国心脏基金会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书