Cost-Effective new energy management strategies for hybrid energy storage solutions

IF 7.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Shuhan Wei, Yichen Sun, Chengzhi Yu, Shon Ming
{"title":"Cost-Effective new energy management strategies for hybrid energy storage solutions","authors":"Shuhan Wei, Yichen Sun, Chengzhi Yu, Shon Ming","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2026.117495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective has significantly expedited the adoption of renewable energy technology to achieve carbon neutrality and maximum emissions. Increasing wind absorption is possible with the use of electrical energy storage. Optimizing the energy storage mechanism also requires an energy management plan. In this study, we present a new approach to energy management and suggest a hybrid energy storage system (HESS) that integrates a power-to-gas converter with a compressed carbon dioxide energy storage system. The first step is to optimize the system’s volume and compare the suggested option to two others. Afterwards, three more cases are examined to confirm consistent findings. The next step is to run a sensitivity analysis. According to the comparative data, the new energy management (NEM) approach has a 25.65% and 24.51% lower levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) than the conventional alternatives in high wind resource (wind/load ratio &gt; 0.30) regions. Still, the latter gains decline to much lower levels in moderate and low wind conditions. In addition, the NEM<ce:hsp sp=\"0.25\"></ce:hsp>option proved to be the most effective out of the four scenarios, further supporting the reliability of the comparison findings. Based on the sensitivity assessment results, optimizing the cost of the polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzer (PEME) increases its design power and decreases its LCOE. Reducing wind curtailment energy, overall cost, and LCOE are further benefits of increasing the prediction period. However, LCOE, overall expenses, and the number of cases with inadequate energy are all worsened by a lower energy limit.","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2026.117495","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective has significantly expedited the adoption of renewable energy technology to achieve carbon neutrality and maximum emissions. Increasing wind absorption is possible with the use of electrical energy storage. Optimizing the energy storage mechanism also requires an energy management plan. In this study, we present a new approach to energy management and suggest a hybrid energy storage system (HESS) that integrates a power-to-gas converter with a compressed carbon dioxide energy storage system. The first step is to optimize the system’s volume and compare the suggested option to two others. Afterwards, three more cases are examined to confirm consistent findings. The next step is to run a sensitivity analysis. According to the comparative data, the new energy management (NEM) approach has a 25.65% and 24.51% lower levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) than the conventional alternatives in high wind resource (wind/load ratio > 0.30) regions. Still, the latter gains decline to much lower levels in moderate and low wind conditions. In addition, the NEMoption proved to be the most effective out of the four scenarios, further supporting the reliability of the comparison findings. Based on the sensitivity assessment results, optimizing the cost of the polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzer (PEME) increases its design power and decreases its LCOE. Reducing wind curtailment energy, overall cost, and LCOE are further benefits of increasing the prediction period. However, LCOE, overall expenses, and the number of cases with inadequate energy are all worsened by a lower energy limit.
具有成本效益的混合能源存储解决方案的新能源管理策略
这一目标大大加快了可再生能源技术的采用,以实现碳中和和最大排放。通过使用电能储存,增加风的吸收是可能的。优化储能机制还需要制定能源管理计划。在这项研究中,我们提出了一种新的能源管理方法,并提出了一种混合能源存储系统(HESS),该系统将电力-气体转换器与压缩二氧化碳能源存储系统集成在一起。第一步是优化系统的容量,并将建议的选项与其他两个选项进行比较。之后,又检查了三个病例,以确认一致的发现。下一步是进行敏感性分析。对比数据显示,在高风资源(风负荷比 >; 0.30)地区,新能源管理(NEM)方式的平准化电力成本(LCOE)分别比传统替代方案低25.65%和24.51%。然而,在中等和低风条件下,后者的收益下降到更低的水平。此外,NEMoption被证明是四种方案中最有效的,进一步支持了比较结果的可靠性。基于灵敏度评估结果,优化聚合物电解质膜电解槽(PEME)的成本,可以提高其设计功率,降低其LCOE。减少弃风能源、总成本和LCOE是延长预测期的进一步好处。然而,LCOE、总费用和能量不足的病例数量都因较低的能量限制而恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书