{"title":"How sexual health becomes marginalized in long-term care: a scoping review of multi-level barriers.","authors":"Aysu Yıldız Karaahmet, Shahla Shafaati Laleh","doi":"10.1093/sxmrev/qeag022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sexual health is a fundamental component of quality of life across the life course; however, it remains largely neglected in institutional care settings for older adults. In nursing homes and long-term care facilities, sexual health is frequently constrained by a range of individual, institutional, sociocultural, and ethical factors, which are often examined in isolation within the existing literature.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This scoping review aimed to map the barriers affecting the sexual health of older adults living in nursing homes and long-term care facilities and to examine how these barriers interact across multiple levels, contributing to complex and reinforcing mechanisms within institutional care contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review methodology was employed in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute framework and reported following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, ASSIA, and relevant grey literature sources. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies addressing barriers to sexual health among older adults in institutional care settings were included. Data were charted and synthesized thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Four interrelated themes were identified: (1) individual-level barriers, (2) institutional and environmental barriers, (3) sociocultural barriers, and (4) ethical and legal barriers. The findings indicate that these barriers do not operate independently; rather, individual vulnerabilities are often amplified through institutional regulations and ethical uncertainties, while sociocultural norms and family expectations further legitimize restrictive practices. This interaction contributes to the systematic marginalization of sexual health within long-term care environments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The review highlights that barriers to sexual health among older adults in institutional care are shaped by interacting and mutually reinforcing processes, rather than isolated factors. Addressing sexual health in nursing homes therefore requires approaches that move beyond single-level interventions and consider the relational and systemic nature of these barriers. Future research should focus on empirically testing these mechanisms and developing multi-level, person-centred interventions to support sexual health in long-term care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":21813,"journal":{"name":"Sexual medicine reviews","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual medicine reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeag022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Sexual health is a fundamental component of quality of life across the life course; however, it remains largely neglected in institutional care settings for older adults. In nursing homes and long-term care facilities, sexual health is frequently constrained by a range of individual, institutional, sociocultural, and ethical factors, which are often examined in isolation within the existing literature.
Objectives: This scoping review aimed to map the barriers affecting the sexual health of older adults living in nursing homes and long-term care facilities and to examine how these barriers interact across multiple levels, contributing to complex and reinforcing mechanisms within institutional care contexts.
Methods: A scoping review methodology was employed in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute framework and reported following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, ASSIA, and relevant grey literature sources. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies addressing barriers to sexual health among older adults in institutional care settings were included. Data were charted and synthesized thematically.
Results: Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Four interrelated themes were identified: (1) individual-level barriers, (2) institutional and environmental barriers, (3) sociocultural barriers, and (4) ethical and legal barriers. The findings indicate that these barriers do not operate independently; rather, individual vulnerabilities are often amplified through institutional regulations and ethical uncertainties, while sociocultural norms and family expectations further legitimize restrictive practices. This interaction contributes to the systematic marginalization of sexual health within long-term care environments.
Conclusions: The review highlights that barriers to sexual health among older adults in institutional care are shaped by interacting and mutually reinforcing processes, rather than isolated factors. Addressing sexual health in nursing homes therefore requires approaches that move beyond single-level interventions and consider the relational and systemic nature of these barriers. Future research should focus on empirically testing these mechanisms and developing multi-level, person-centred interventions to support sexual health in long-term care settings.
导言:性健康是整个生命过程中生活质量的基本组成部分;然而,在老年人的机构护理环境中,它在很大程度上仍然被忽视。在养老院和长期护理机构中,性健康经常受到一系列个人、机构、社会文化和道德因素的制约,这些因素在现有文献中往往是孤立的。目的:本范围审查旨在绘制影响养老院和长期护理设施中老年人性健康的障碍,并检查这些障碍如何在多个层面上相互作用,促进机构护理环境中复杂和加强的机制。方法:采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所框架的范围审查方法,并按照PRISMA-ScR指南进行报告。系统检索MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Embase、Web of Science、ASSIA及相关灰色文献。包括定性、定量和混合方法研究,解决机构护理环境中老年人性健康的障碍。数据被绘制成图表并按主题合成。结果:19项研究符合纳入标准。确定了四个相互关联的主题:(1)个人层面的障碍;(2)制度和环境障碍;(3)社会文化障碍;(4)伦理和法律障碍。研究结果表明,这些屏障并不是独立运作的;相反,个人的脆弱性往往因体制规定和道德不确定性而被放大,而社会文化规范和家庭期望则进一步使限制性做法合法化。这种相互作用导致性健康在长期护理环境中被系统性地边缘化。结论:该综述强调,机构护理中的老年人性健康障碍是由相互作用和相互加强的过程形成的,而不是孤立的因素。因此,在养老院解决性健康问题需要超越单一层面的干预措施,并考虑这些障碍的关系和系统性质。未来的研究应侧重于对这些机制进行实证测试,并开发多层次、以人为本的干预措施,以支持长期护理环境中的性健康。