Assessment and Management of Post-traumatic Headache.

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alex S Aguirre, Yasmine Elhefnawy, Alcy R Torres
{"title":"Assessment and Management of Post-traumatic Headache.","authors":"Alex S Aguirre, Yasmine Elhefnawy, Alcy R Torres","doi":"10.1007/s11910-026-01494-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The goal of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive analysis of Post-Traumatic Headache (PTH), addressing its epidemiology, pathophysiology, and multidisciplinary management. The paper seeks to explore the diagnostic controversies surrounding the timing of symptom onset and evaluates current assessment methods and treatment paradigms for this prevalent sequela of traumatic brain injury. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent research highlights that while current diagnostic criteria require headache onset within seven days of injury, delayed-onset symptoms are common, creating a significant diagnostic dilemma. Pathophysiologically, PTH is understood to be multifaceted, driven by neuroinflammation, neurometabolic cascades, and central sensitization. These processes result in clinical phenotypes that often mirror primary migraine or tension-type headaches. Additionally, while clinical history remains the gold standard for assessment, emerging blood biomarkers are showing promise as objective tools for evaluation. The review concludes that PTH management currently requires a multimodal approach, combining non-pharmacological interventions with pharmacological treatments adapted from primary headache protocols. A major takeaway is the lack of high-quality, PTH-specific randomized controlled trials, which currently forces a reliance on expert opinion rather than robust clinical evidence. To improve patient outcomes, future research must shift toward a more multi-disciplinary, patient-centered paradigm and focus on generating high-quality data to move beyond diagnostic controversies and empiric treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10831,"journal":{"name":"Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-026-01494-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The goal of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive analysis of Post-Traumatic Headache (PTH), addressing its epidemiology, pathophysiology, and multidisciplinary management. The paper seeks to explore the diagnostic controversies surrounding the timing of symptom onset and evaluates current assessment methods and treatment paradigms for this prevalent sequela of traumatic brain injury. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent research highlights that while current diagnostic criteria require headache onset within seven days of injury, delayed-onset symptoms are common, creating a significant diagnostic dilemma. Pathophysiologically, PTH is understood to be multifaceted, driven by neuroinflammation, neurometabolic cascades, and central sensitization. These processes result in clinical phenotypes that often mirror primary migraine or tension-type headaches. Additionally, while clinical history remains the gold standard for assessment, emerging blood biomarkers are showing promise as objective tools for evaluation. The review concludes that PTH management currently requires a multimodal approach, combining non-pharmacological interventions with pharmacological treatments adapted from primary headache protocols. A major takeaway is the lack of high-quality, PTH-specific randomized controlled trials, which currently forces a reliance on expert opinion rather than robust clinical evidence. To improve patient outcomes, future research must shift toward a more multi-disciplinary, patient-centered paradigm and focus on generating high-quality data to move beyond diagnostic controversies and empiric treatment.

创伤后头痛的评估与处理。
综述目的:这篇叙述性综述的目的是提供创伤后头痛(PTH)的综合分析,解决其流行病学,病理生理学和多学科管理。本文旨在探讨围绕症状发作时间的诊断争议,并评估目前的评估方法和治疗范例,以治疗这种普遍的创伤性脑损伤后遗症。最近的发现:最近的研究强调,虽然目前的诊断标准要求头痛在受伤后7天内发作,但延迟发作的症状很常见,这造成了一个重大的诊断困境。病理生理学上,PTH被认为是多方面的,由神经炎症、神经代谢级联和中枢致敏驱动。这些过程导致临床表型通常反映原发性偏头痛或紧张性头痛。此外,虽然临床病史仍然是评估的金标准,但新兴的血液生物标志物正在显示出作为客观评估工具的希望。这篇综述的结论是,目前甲状旁腺激素的治疗需要多模式的方法,将非药物干预与适应于原发性头痛方案的药物治疗相结合。一个主要的问题是缺乏高质量的pth特异性随机对照试验,这目前迫使依赖专家意见,而不是强有力的临床证据。为了改善患者的治疗效果,未来的研究必须转向更加多学科、以患者为中心的模式,并专注于产生高质量的数据,以超越诊断争议和经验治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports provides in-depth review articles contributed by international experts on the most significant developments in the field. By presenting clear, insightful, balanced reviews that emphasize recently published papers of major importance, the journal elucidates current and emerging approaches to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of neurological disease and disorders. Presents the views of experts on current advances in neurology and neuroscience Gathers and synthesizes important recent papers on the topic Includes reviews of recently published clinical trials, valuable web sites, and commentaries from well-known figures in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书