Joseph J Taylor,Balázs Szigeti,Noah D Silverberg,Masoud Ahmadzad-Asl,Marina Kare,Ryan Webler,Diana K Orsini,Joshua D Rosenblat,Tom Bschor,Christopher Baethge,Mark Sinyor,Timothy R Nicholson,Tor D Wager,Matthew J Burke
{"title":"Measuring and appraising placebo effects in clinical trials: contemporary challenges and approaches in psychiatry.","authors":"Joseph J Taylor,Balázs Szigeti,Noah D Silverberg,Masoud Ahmadzad-Asl,Marina Kare,Ryan Webler,Diana K Orsini,Joshua D Rosenblat,Tom Bschor,Christopher Baethge,Mark Sinyor,Timothy R Nicholson,Tor D Wager,Matthew J Burke","doi":"10.1016/s2215-0366(26)00018-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Placebo effects are among the greatest paradoxes in medical research. Although more data on placebos are available from placebo-controlled trials than on any treatment in medicine, there has been comparatively little deep interrogation of issues related to their measurement, appraisal, and interpretation. Most of the work that has been done, including that in psychiatry, is narrowly focused on strategies for mitigating placebo effects and the challenges they might pose. In this Review, paper 2 of 2 on reconceptualising placebo and nocebo effects, we shift our focus from clinical practice to clinical trials. First, we review established and emerging approaches for navigating placebo effects in randomised controlled trials. Second, we examine three major challenges in contemporary psychiatric research that have recently highlighted the topic of placebo effects: (1) blinding and expectancy in psychedelic trials, (2) large placebo responses in interventional psychiatry trials (ie, device or procedure-based therapeutics), and (3) implications of overlapping neurobiological mechanisms between placebo effects and psychiatric treatments.","PeriodicalId":48784,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Psychiatry","volume":"38 1","pages":"426-440"},"PeriodicalIF":24.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(26)00018-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Placebo effects are among the greatest paradoxes in medical research. Although more data on placebos are available from placebo-controlled trials than on any treatment in medicine, there has been comparatively little deep interrogation of issues related to their measurement, appraisal, and interpretation. Most of the work that has been done, including that in psychiatry, is narrowly focused on strategies for mitigating placebo effects and the challenges they might pose. In this Review, paper 2 of 2 on reconceptualising placebo and nocebo effects, we shift our focus from clinical practice to clinical trials. First, we review established and emerging approaches for navigating placebo effects in randomised controlled trials. Second, we examine three major challenges in contemporary psychiatric research that have recently highlighted the topic of placebo effects: (1) blinding and expectancy in psychedelic trials, (2) large placebo responses in interventional psychiatry trials (ie, device or procedure-based therapeutics), and (3) implications of overlapping neurobiological mechanisms between placebo effects and psychiatric treatments.
期刊介绍:
The Lancet Psychiatry is a globally renowned and trusted resource for groundbreaking research in the field of psychiatry. We specialize in publishing original studies that contribute to transforming and shedding light on important aspects of psychiatric practice. Our comprehensive coverage extends to diverse topics including psychopharmacology, psychotherapy, and psychosocial approaches that address psychiatric disorders throughout the lifespan. We aim to channel innovative treatments and examine the biological research that forms the foundation of such advancements. Our journal also explores novel service delivery methods and promotes fresh perspectives on mental illness, emphasizing the significant contributions of social psychiatry.