Measuring and appraising placebo effects in clinical trials: contemporary challenges and approaches in psychiatry.

IF 24.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Joseph J Taylor,Balázs Szigeti,Noah D Silverberg,Masoud Ahmadzad-Asl,Marina Kare,Ryan Webler,Diana K Orsini,Joshua D Rosenblat,Tom Bschor,Christopher Baethge,Mark Sinyor,Timothy R Nicholson,Tor D Wager,Matthew J Burke
{"title":"Measuring and appraising placebo effects in clinical trials: contemporary challenges and approaches in psychiatry.","authors":"Joseph J Taylor,Balázs Szigeti,Noah D Silverberg,Masoud Ahmadzad-Asl,Marina Kare,Ryan Webler,Diana K Orsini,Joshua D Rosenblat,Tom Bschor,Christopher Baethge,Mark Sinyor,Timothy R Nicholson,Tor D Wager,Matthew J Burke","doi":"10.1016/s2215-0366(26)00018-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Placebo effects are among the greatest paradoxes in medical research. Although more data on placebos are available from placebo-controlled trials than on any treatment in medicine, there has been comparatively little deep interrogation of issues related to their measurement, appraisal, and interpretation. Most of the work that has been done, including that in psychiatry, is narrowly focused on strategies for mitigating placebo effects and the challenges they might pose. In this Review, paper 2 of 2 on reconceptualising placebo and nocebo effects, we shift our focus from clinical practice to clinical trials. First, we review established and emerging approaches for navigating placebo effects in randomised controlled trials. Second, we examine three major challenges in contemporary psychiatric research that have recently highlighted the topic of placebo effects: (1) blinding and expectancy in psychedelic trials, (2) large placebo responses in interventional psychiatry trials (ie, device or procedure-based therapeutics), and (3) implications of overlapping neurobiological mechanisms between placebo effects and psychiatric treatments.","PeriodicalId":48784,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Psychiatry","volume":"38 1","pages":"426-440"},"PeriodicalIF":24.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(26)00018-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Placebo effects are among the greatest paradoxes in medical research. Although more data on placebos are available from placebo-controlled trials than on any treatment in medicine, there has been comparatively little deep interrogation of issues related to their measurement, appraisal, and interpretation. Most of the work that has been done, including that in psychiatry, is narrowly focused on strategies for mitigating placebo effects and the challenges they might pose. In this Review, paper 2 of 2 on reconceptualising placebo and nocebo effects, we shift our focus from clinical practice to clinical trials. First, we review established and emerging approaches for navigating placebo effects in randomised controlled trials. Second, we examine three major challenges in contemporary psychiatric research that have recently highlighted the topic of placebo effects: (1) blinding and expectancy in psychedelic trials, (2) large placebo responses in interventional psychiatry trials (ie, device or procedure-based therapeutics), and (3) implications of overlapping neurobiological mechanisms between placebo effects and psychiatric treatments.
临床试验中安慰剂效应的测量和评价:精神病学的当代挑战和方法。
安慰剂效应是医学研究中最大的悖论之一。尽管从安慰剂对照试验中获得的关于安慰剂的数据比任何医学治疗都要多,但相对而言,对其测量、评估和解释相关问题的深入研究却很少。大多数已经完成的工作,包括精神病学的工作,都局限于减轻安慰剂效应的策略及其可能带来的挑战。在这篇关于重新定义安慰剂和反安慰剂效应的综述中,我们将重点从临床实践转移到临床试验。首先,我们回顾了在随机对照试验中导航安慰剂效应的既定和新兴方法。其次,我们研究了当代精神病学研究中的三个主要挑战,这些挑战最近突出了安慰剂效应的主题:(1)致幻剂试验中的盲法和预期;(2)介入性精神病学试验(即基于设备或程序的治疗)中的大安慰剂反应;(3)安慰剂效应和精神病学治疗之间重叠的神经生物学机制的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lancet Psychiatry
Lancet Psychiatry PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
58.30
自引率
0.90%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Lancet Psychiatry is a globally renowned and trusted resource for groundbreaking research in the field of psychiatry. We specialize in publishing original studies that contribute to transforming and shedding light on important aspects of psychiatric practice. Our comprehensive coverage extends to diverse topics including psychopharmacology, psychotherapy, and psychosocial approaches that address psychiatric disorders throughout the lifespan. We aim to channel innovative treatments and examine the biological research that forms the foundation of such advancements. Our journal also explores novel service delivery methods and promotes fresh perspectives on mental illness, emphasizing the significant contributions of social psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书