Visual screening in an orthogeriatric rehabilitation setting: a feasibility evaluation.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2026-03-16 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igag022
Martin Chi Kit Yan, Siraj Farid, Jay Chillala, Robert A Harper
{"title":"Visual screening in an orthogeriatric rehabilitation setting: a feasibility evaluation.","authors":"Martin Chi Kit Yan, Siraj Farid, Jay Chillala, Robert A Harper","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igag022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Vision loss is a significant risk factor for falls. Given the associated morbidity and mortality, proactive risk-reduction strategies are warranted. This evaluation aimed to assess the feasibility and potential clinical value of bedside visual screening in an orthogeriatric rehabilitation setting and to estimate the proportion of previously unrecognized visual deficits among older inpatients admitted following a fall.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>In this prospective, single-center feasibility evaluation, 21 patients aged ≥65 years admitted post-falls were assessed. Eligible participants scored >6 on the Abbreviated Mental Test Score. Bedside assessments included unaided vision, visual acuity (VA), low-contrast VA, and visual fields using Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) charts and the Melbourne Rapid Fields web-based platform. Ocular history and participant feedback on the screening experience were also collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unaided vision or habitual VA worse than 0.3 LogMAR (<6/12 Snellen equivalent) in at least one eye was observed in 67% of participants; 88% showed impaired low-contrast VA. Only 33% had been examined by a primary care optometrist in the year preceding admission. A proportion of deficits were potentially modifiable. Screening was well tolerated, with participants reporting a good understanding of the procedures.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Bedside visual screening by trained non-ophthalmic specialists is feasible and potentially clinically informative in the orthogeriatric setting. The high proportion of undetected visual deficits suggests missed opportunities for falls prevention. Routine standardized visual assessments may enable timely referrals, improve visual outcomes, and reduce falls-related morbidity in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"10 5","pages":"igag022"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13082475/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igag022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Vision loss is a significant risk factor for falls. Given the associated morbidity and mortality, proactive risk-reduction strategies are warranted. This evaluation aimed to assess the feasibility and potential clinical value of bedside visual screening in an orthogeriatric rehabilitation setting and to estimate the proportion of previously unrecognized visual deficits among older inpatients admitted following a fall.

Research design and methods: In this prospective, single-center feasibility evaluation, 21 patients aged ≥65 years admitted post-falls were assessed. Eligible participants scored >6 on the Abbreviated Mental Test Score. Bedside assessments included unaided vision, visual acuity (VA), low-contrast VA, and visual fields using Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) charts and the Melbourne Rapid Fields web-based platform. Ocular history and participant feedback on the screening experience were also collected.

Results: Unaided vision or habitual VA worse than 0.3 LogMAR (<6/12 Snellen equivalent) in at least one eye was observed in 67% of participants; 88% showed impaired low-contrast VA. Only 33% had been examined by a primary care optometrist in the year preceding admission. A proportion of deficits were potentially modifiable. Screening was well tolerated, with participants reporting a good understanding of the procedures.

Discussion and implications: Bedside visual screening by trained non-ophthalmic specialists is feasible and potentially clinically informative in the orthogeriatric setting. The high proportion of undetected visual deficits suggests missed opportunities for falls prevention. Routine standardized visual assessments may enable timely referrals, improve visual outcomes, and reduce falls-related morbidity in older adults.

视觉筛查在骨科康复设置:可行性评估。
背景和目的:视力丧失是跌倒的重要危险因素。鉴于相关的发病率和死亡率,有必要采取主动降低风险的战略。本评估旨在评估床边视力筛查在骨科康复环境中的可行性和潜在临床价值,并估计跌倒后入院的老年住院患者中先前未被识别的视力缺陷的比例。研究设计和方法:在这项前瞻性、单中心可行性评估中,对21例年龄≥65岁的跌倒后入院的患者进行了评估。符合条件的参与者在简短智力测试得分中得分为bb60。床边评估包括无辅助视力、视力(VA)、低对比度VA和使用最小分辨率角对数(LogMAR)图表和墨尔本快速领域网络平台的视野。还收集了眼部病史和参与者对筛查体验的反馈。结果:无辅助视力或习惯性VA低于0.3 LogMAR(讨论和意义:由训练有素的非眼科专家进行床边视力筛查是可行的,并且在骨科环境中具有潜在的临床信息。未被发现的视力缺陷的高比例表明错过了预防跌倒的机会。常规的标准化视力评估可以使老年人及时转诊,改善视力结果,并减少跌倒相关的发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书