Martin Chi Kit Yan, Siraj Farid, Jay Chillala, Robert A Harper
{"title":"Visual screening in an orthogeriatric rehabilitation setting: a feasibility evaluation.","authors":"Martin Chi Kit Yan, Siraj Farid, Jay Chillala, Robert A Harper","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igag022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Vision loss is a significant risk factor for falls. Given the associated morbidity and mortality, proactive risk-reduction strategies are warranted. This evaluation aimed to assess the feasibility and potential clinical value of bedside visual screening in an orthogeriatric rehabilitation setting and to estimate the proportion of previously unrecognized visual deficits among older inpatients admitted following a fall.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>In this prospective, single-center feasibility evaluation, 21 patients aged ≥65 years admitted post-falls were assessed. Eligible participants scored >6 on the Abbreviated Mental Test Score. Bedside assessments included unaided vision, visual acuity (VA), low-contrast VA, and visual fields using Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) charts and the Melbourne Rapid Fields web-based platform. Ocular history and participant feedback on the screening experience were also collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unaided vision or habitual VA worse than 0.3 LogMAR (<6/12 Snellen equivalent) in at least one eye was observed in 67% of participants; 88% showed impaired low-contrast VA. Only 33% had been examined by a primary care optometrist in the year preceding admission. A proportion of deficits were potentially modifiable. Screening was well tolerated, with participants reporting a good understanding of the procedures.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Bedside visual screening by trained non-ophthalmic specialists is feasible and potentially clinically informative in the orthogeriatric setting. The high proportion of undetected visual deficits suggests missed opportunities for falls prevention. Routine standardized visual assessments may enable timely referrals, improve visual outcomes, and reduce falls-related morbidity in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"10 5","pages":"igag022"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13082475/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igag022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Vision loss is a significant risk factor for falls. Given the associated morbidity and mortality, proactive risk-reduction strategies are warranted. This evaluation aimed to assess the feasibility and potential clinical value of bedside visual screening in an orthogeriatric rehabilitation setting and to estimate the proportion of previously unrecognized visual deficits among older inpatients admitted following a fall.
Research design and methods: In this prospective, single-center feasibility evaluation, 21 patients aged ≥65 years admitted post-falls were assessed. Eligible participants scored >6 on the Abbreviated Mental Test Score. Bedside assessments included unaided vision, visual acuity (VA), low-contrast VA, and visual fields using Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) charts and the Melbourne Rapid Fields web-based platform. Ocular history and participant feedback on the screening experience were also collected.
Results: Unaided vision or habitual VA worse than 0.3 LogMAR (<6/12 Snellen equivalent) in at least one eye was observed in 67% of participants; 88% showed impaired low-contrast VA. Only 33% had been examined by a primary care optometrist in the year preceding admission. A proportion of deficits were potentially modifiable. Screening was well tolerated, with participants reporting a good understanding of the procedures.
Discussion and implications: Bedside visual screening by trained non-ophthalmic specialists is feasible and potentially clinically informative in the orthogeriatric setting. The high proportion of undetected visual deficits suggests missed opportunities for falls prevention. Routine standardized visual assessments may enable timely referrals, improve visual outcomes, and reduce falls-related morbidity in older adults.
期刊介绍:
Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.