Accessibility Challenges for Blind Users Authoring in Content Management Systems: An Empirical Study

IF 1 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Guillermo Vera-Amaro;José Rafael Rojano-Cáceres
{"title":"Accessibility Challenges for Blind Users Authoring in Content Management Systems: An Empirical Study","authors":"Guillermo Vera-Amaro;José Rafael Rojano-Cáceres","doi":"10.1109/RITA.2026.3681871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While accessibility research often emphasizes the experiences of blind users as consumers of online content, far less attention has been given to their role as content authors in Content Management Systems (CMS). For blind users, the accessibility of CMS platforms is fundamental to ensure efficient navigation, content creation, and overall usability. This study investigates the accessibility challenges faced by blind authors when working with WordPress as a representative CMS, identifies barriers related to navigation and content management, and offers insights to improve inclusive design. A mixed evaluation strategy was employed, combining automated testing tools with a manual assessment based on the barrier walkthrough method. Three blind participants and one sighted participant completed representative CMS tasks—such as navigation, content editing, and menu creation—using NVDA and JAWS screen readers. In addition, an expert evaluation analyzed the severity of the identified barriers. Findings indicate that block-based and drag-and-drop interfaces remain highly inaccessible for screen reader technologies, while AI-powered image descriptions help reduce dependence on sighted assistance. Results also highlight a clear mismatch between pages considered accessible by automated tools and the barriers observed in manual testing, underscoring the limitations of automated evaluations. Overall, the study stresses the need for CMS platforms to improve navigation consistency, reduce dependence on dropdown submenus, and integrate AI support to better address the needs of blind authors.","PeriodicalId":38963,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje","volume":"21 ","pages":"268-278"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11475841/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While accessibility research often emphasizes the experiences of blind users as consumers of online content, far less attention has been given to their role as content authors in Content Management Systems (CMS). For blind users, the accessibility of CMS platforms is fundamental to ensure efficient navigation, content creation, and overall usability. This study investigates the accessibility challenges faced by blind authors when working with WordPress as a representative CMS, identifies barriers related to navigation and content management, and offers insights to improve inclusive design. A mixed evaluation strategy was employed, combining automated testing tools with a manual assessment based on the barrier walkthrough method. Three blind participants and one sighted participant completed representative CMS tasks—such as navigation, content editing, and menu creation—using NVDA and JAWS screen readers. In addition, an expert evaluation analyzed the severity of the identified barriers. Findings indicate that block-based and drag-and-drop interfaces remain highly inaccessible for screen reader technologies, while AI-powered image descriptions help reduce dependence on sighted assistance. Results also highlight a clear mismatch between pages considered accessible by automated tools and the barriers observed in manual testing, underscoring the limitations of automated evaluations. Overall, the study stresses the need for CMS platforms to improve navigation consistency, reduce dependence on dropdown submenus, and integrate AI support to better address the needs of blind authors.
内容管理系统中盲人用户创作的可访问性挑战:实证研究
虽然无障碍研究经常强调盲人用户作为在线内容消费者的体验,但很少关注他们在内容管理系统(CMS)中作为内容作者的角色。对于盲人用户来说,CMS平台的可访问性是确保高效导航、内容创建和整体可用性的基础。本研究调查了盲人作者在使用WordPress作为代表性CMS时所面临的可访问性挑战,确定了与导航和内容管理相关的障碍,并为改进包容性设计提供了见解。采用混合评估策略,将自动测试工具与基于障碍遍历方法的手动评估相结合。三名盲人参与者和一名视力正常的参与者使用NVDA和JAWS屏幕阅读器完成了代表性的CMS任务,如导航、内容编辑和菜单创建。此外,专家评估分析了识别障碍的严重程度。研究结果表明,基于块和拖放的界面对于屏幕阅读器技术来说仍然是高度不可访问的,而基于人工智能的图像描述有助于减少对视力辅助的依赖。结果还强调了在被认为可以被自动化工具访问的页面和在手工测试中观察到的障碍之间明显的不匹配,强调了自动化评估的局限性。总体而言,该研究强调CMS平台需要提高导航一致性,减少对下拉子菜单的依赖,并集成AI支持,以更好地满足盲人作者的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书