Constructing Meaning in Digital Lives: A Theory‐Driven and Practical Approach to Using Online Forums in Family Science

IF 4.5 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
J. Kale Monk, Tyler B. Jamison, Erin D. Basinger, Matthew A. Ogan, Bryan Abendschein, Karen E. Talley
{"title":"Constructing Meaning in Digital Lives: A Theory‐Driven and Practical Approach to Using Online Forums in Family Science","authors":"J. Kale Monk, Tyler B. Jamison, Erin D. Basinger, Matthew A. Ogan, Bryan Abendschein, Karen E. Talley","doi":"10.1111/jftr.70057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online forums offer family scholars a unique opportunity to learn how people make sense of complex issues related to family, identity, and relationships. These digital spaces often mirror or even amplify offline dynamics, as users interact to disclose sensitive information, construct narratives, offer validation, or address uncertainty. Online forums provide an authentic glimpse into a group or phenomenon through easily accessible, naturally‐occurring interactions, including from hard‐to‐reach populations. Guided by symbolic interactionism, we offer practical guidance for researchers interested in this approach. We draw from existing literature to outline strategies for identifying relevant forums, collecting data ethically, and analyzing data using qualitative methods. In addition to providing several examples of published work using forums as a data source, we provide a case example of a published study using data from Reddit to demonstrate potential steps for interested scholars to follow in conducting online forums research. We explore potential study design challenges that researchers should consider, including the lack of consistent demographic data, difficulties in conducting follow‐ups, and the risk of social desirability bias, even in anonymous settings. We also highlight ethical considerations inherent in this type of research. Overall, family scientists can expand their methodological toolkit and gain deeper insights into the lived experiences of individuals and families in the digital age by considering online forums as a rich data source.","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"153 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.70057","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online forums offer family scholars a unique opportunity to learn how people make sense of complex issues related to family, identity, and relationships. These digital spaces often mirror or even amplify offline dynamics, as users interact to disclose sensitive information, construct narratives, offer validation, or address uncertainty. Online forums provide an authentic glimpse into a group or phenomenon through easily accessible, naturally‐occurring interactions, including from hard‐to‐reach populations. Guided by symbolic interactionism, we offer practical guidance for researchers interested in this approach. We draw from existing literature to outline strategies for identifying relevant forums, collecting data ethically, and analyzing data using qualitative methods. In addition to providing several examples of published work using forums as a data source, we provide a case example of a published study using data from Reddit to demonstrate potential steps for interested scholars to follow in conducting online forums research. We explore potential study design challenges that researchers should consider, including the lack of consistent demographic data, difficulties in conducting follow‐ups, and the risk of social desirability bias, even in anonymous settings. We also highlight ethical considerations inherent in this type of research. Overall, family scientists can expand their methodological toolkit and gain deeper insights into the lived experiences of individuals and families in the digital age by considering online forums as a rich data source.
构建数字生活的意义:在家庭科学中使用在线论坛的理论驱动和实践方法
在线论坛为家庭学者提供了一个独特的机会来了解人们如何理解与家庭、身份和关系有关的复杂问题。这些数字空间通常反映甚至放大了离线动态,因为用户通过交互来披露敏感信息、构建叙述、提供验证或解决不确定性。在线论坛通过容易接近的、自然发生的互动,包括难以接触到的人群,提供了对一个群体或现象的真实一瞥。在符号互动主义的指导下,我们为对这一方法感兴趣的研究人员提供实践指导。我们从现有文献中概述了识别相关论坛,道德收集数据和使用定性方法分析数据的策略。除了提供几个使用论坛作为数据源的已发表作品的例子外,我们还提供了一个使用Reddit数据的已发表研究的案例,以展示感兴趣的学者在进行在线论坛研究时可能遵循的步骤。我们探讨了研究人员应该考虑的潜在研究设计挑战,包括缺乏一致的人口统计数据,进行随访的困难,以及即使在匿名设置中也存在社会期望偏差的风险。我们还强调了这类研究中固有的伦理考虑。总的来说,通过将在线论坛作为丰富的数据来源,家庭科学家可以扩展他们的方法工具包,并更深入地了解数字时代个人和家庭的生活经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书