The mosaic of experience: How individual differences in attention and working memory shape event segmentation.

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Berna Güler, Eren Günseli
{"title":"The mosaic of experience: How individual differences in attention and working memory shape event segmentation.","authors":"Berna Güler, Eren Günseli","doi":"10.1186/s41235-026-00729-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Episodic memories, although experienced as continuous, are structured into discrete events, a process supported by working memory (WM) and attentional control. Yet, the causal contributions of these mechanisms remain underspecified. This review synthesizes behavioral, cognitive, and neural findings from healthy aging and three cognitive profiles with known WM and attentional control impairments (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, dyslexia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder) to clarify how these mechanisms shape event segmentation. Drawing on converging findings across these groups, we outline theoretically grounded expectations: aging may show preserved segmentation when semantic structure is firm but disruptions under interference and higher control demands; ADHD may exhibit coarser segmentation and reduced agreement due to attentional lapses and self-referential intrusions; dyslexia may show reduced fine-grained segmentation specifically for rapidly changing verbal events due to temporal-processing limits; and OCD may demonstrate schema-driven, idiosyncratic boundary placement under threat-relevant contexts. Integrating these findings, we propose a mechanism-centered framework in which segmentation arises from the interaction of WM constraints, attentional control dynamics, and schema/contextual modulation. This framework refines prediction-error-based accounts and generates testable hypotheses for future experimental work.</p>","PeriodicalId":46827,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Research-Principles and Implications","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13083691/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Research-Principles and Implications","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-026-00729-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Episodic memories, although experienced as continuous, are structured into discrete events, a process supported by working memory (WM) and attentional control. Yet, the causal contributions of these mechanisms remain underspecified. This review synthesizes behavioral, cognitive, and neural findings from healthy aging and three cognitive profiles with known WM and attentional control impairments (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, dyslexia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder) to clarify how these mechanisms shape event segmentation. Drawing on converging findings across these groups, we outline theoretically grounded expectations: aging may show preserved segmentation when semantic structure is firm but disruptions under interference and higher control demands; ADHD may exhibit coarser segmentation and reduced agreement due to attentional lapses and self-referential intrusions; dyslexia may show reduced fine-grained segmentation specifically for rapidly changing verbal events due to temporal-processing limits; and OCD may demonstrate schema-driven, idiosyncratic boundary placement under threat-relevant contexts. Integrating these findings, we propose a mechanism-centered framework in which segmentation arises from the interaction of WM constraints, attentional control dynamics, and schema/contextual modulation. This framework refines prediction-error-based accounts and generates testable hypotheses for future experimental work.

经验的镶嵌:注意和工作记忆的个体差异如何塑造事件分割。
情景记忆虽然是连续的,但被组织成离散的事件,这一过程由工作记忆(WM)和注意力控制支持。然而,这些机制的因果贡献仍然不明确。这篇综述综合了健康衰老的行为、认知和神经方面的发现,以及已知WM和注意力控制障碍(注意缺陷/多动障碍、阅读障碍和强迫症)的三种认知特征,以阐明这些机制如何塑造事件分割。根据这些群体的研究结果,我们概述了理论上基于的期望:当语义结构牢固但在干扰和更高控制要求下中断时,老化可能会显示保留的分割;由于注意力缺失和自我指涉侵入,ADHD可能表现出较粗的分割和较低的一致性;由于时间处理的限制,阅读障碍可能表现出对快速变化的言语事件的细粒度分割减少;强迫症可能在威胁相关情境下表现出图式驱动的、特殊的边界放置。综合这些发现,我们提出了一个以机制为中心的框架,其中分词产生于WM约束、注意控制动力学和图式/语境调制的相互作用。该框架改进了基于预测错误的解释,并为未来的实验工作生成了可测试的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.30%
发文量
96
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书