Capturing naturalistic thoughts using a precision experience sampling idiographic approach.

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Julia W Y Kam, Sairamya Nanjappan Jothiraj, Emily Beauchemin, Nabil Al Nahin Ch, Laura K Allen, Jolie B Wormwood, Caitlin Mills
{"title":"Capturing naturalistic thoughts using a precision experience sampling idiographic approach.","authors":"Julia W Y Kam, Sairamya Nanjappan Jothiraj, Emily Beauchemin, Nabil Al Nahin Ch, Laura K Allen, Jolie B Wormwood, Caitlin Mills","doi":"10.1186/s41235-026-00728-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The existing literature on naturalistic thoughts has offered insights into the general patterns of thoughts common across large groups of participants. However, little is known about individual variability in thoughts. One approach to understanding variation within individuals is precision experience sampling, an idiographic approach that involves sampling inner experiences across multiple sessions and/or timepoints. This creates a comprehensive portrayal of an individual's thoughts across time and context, which in turn facilitates person-specific predictions of their thoughts. The current study therefore used precision experience sampling to examine individual variations in naturalistic thoughts as a function of ongoing task. We implemented 7 sessions per participant (n = 7, idiographic group), resulting in 49 datasets. We verified that the descriptives of thoughts and task-modulatory effects of thoughts in this group were comparable to a larger cohort of participants (n = 49, nomothetic group) who each completed one session. Both groups were asked to complete whatever task they wished on the laboratory computer and to occasionally report their current task and numerous thought dimensions. Our results revealed considerable individual differences in the modulatory effects of task on thought dimensions, such that individuals engaged in different types of thoughts under different task contexts, underscoring the importance of considering both individual and contextual factors. They also indicated that patterns observed at the group level did not always accurately represent individual level patterns. Furthermore, applying machine learning algorithms on reports of the task-at-hand reliably detected all thought dimensions, with superior classification performance in the idiographic compared to nomothetic group. Overall, our study demonstrates the idiosyncratic effects of task on naturalistic thoughts and highlights the value of precision experience sampling in improving person-specific predictions of thoughts, which has important methodological and clinical implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":46827,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Research-Principles and Implications","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13083714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Research-Principles and Implications","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-026-00728-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The existing literature on naturalistic thoughts has offered insights into the general patterns of thoughts common across large groups of participants. However, little is known about individual variability in thoughts. One approach to understanding variation within individuals is precision experience sampling, an idiographic approach that involves sampling inner experiences across multiple sessions and/or timepoints. This creates a comprehensive portrayal of an individual's thoughts across time and context, which in turn facilitates person-specific predictions of their thoughts. The current study therefore used precision experience sampling to examine individual variations in naturalistic thoughts as a function of ongoing task. We implemented 7 sessions per participant (n = 7, idiographic group), resulting in 49 datasets. We verified that the descriptives of thoughts and task-modulatory effects of thoughts in this group were comparable to a larger cohort of participants (n = 49, nomothetic group) who each completed one session. Both groups were asked to complete whatever task they wished on the laboratory computer and to occasionally report their current task and numerous thought dimensions. Our results revealed considerable individual differences in the modulatory effects of task on thought dimensions, such that individuals engaged in different types of thoughts under different task contexts, underscoring the importance of considering both individual and contextual factors. They also indicated that patterns observed at the group level did not always accurately represent individual level patterns. Furthermore, applying machine learning algorithms on reports of the task-at-hand reliably detected all thought dimensions, with superior classification performance in the idiographic compared to nomothetic group. Overall, our study demonstrates the idiosyncratic effects of task on naturalistic thoughts and highlights the value of precision experience sampling in improving person-specific predictions of thoughts, which has important methodological and clinical implications.

使用精确的经验采样具体方法捕捉自然主义思想。
现有的关于自然主义思想的文献已经提供了对大群体参与者共同的一般思维模式的见解。然而,人们对个体思维的可变性知之甚少。理解个体内部变化的一种方法是精确体验抽样,这是一种具体的方法,涉及在多个会议和/或时间点抽样内心体验。这创造了一个跨越时间和环境的个人思想的全面写照,这反过来又促进了对个人思想的具体预测。因此,目前的研究使用精确的经验抽样来检查作为正在进行的任务的功能的自然主义思想的个体变化。我们对每个参与者进行了7次治疗(n = 7,具体组),得到49个数据集。我们证实,这一组的思想描述和思想的任务调节效应与一个更大的参与者队列(n = 49,非同构组)相当,他们每个人完成一个会话。两组人都被要求在实验室电脑上完成他们想要完成的任何任务,并偶尔报告他们当前的任务和许多思想维度。我们的研究结果显示,任务对思维维度的调节作用存在相当大的个体差异,因此,个体在不同的任务环境下从事不同类型的思维,强调了同时考虑个体和环境因素的重要性。他们还指出,在群体水平上观察到的模式并不总是准确地代表个人水平的模式。此外,将机器学习算法应用于手头任务的报告中,可以可靠地检测到所有思想维度,与非本体组相比,在具体组中具有更高的分类性能。总的来说,我们的研究证明了任务对自然主义思想的特质效应,并强调了精确经验抽样在改善个人特定思想预测方面的价值,这具有重要的方法学和临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.30%
发文量
96
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书