The Impact of Social Integration on the Fertility Intentions of Migrants: Evidence From China

IF 2.6 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Wenfang Luo, Yanfeng Jiang, Junxi Qian, Dedong Feng
{"title":"The Impact of Social Integration on the Fertility Intentions of Migrants: Evidence From China","authors":"Wenfang Luo,&nbsp;Yanfeng Jiang,&nbsp;Junxi Qian,&nbsp;Dedong Feng","doi":"10.1002/psp.70247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In addition to developed nations, the challenges of population ageing and declining fertility have also intensified in populous East Asian regions, prominently represented by China. Migrants serve as a critical urban labour resource in these countries and territories, and their fertility intentions directly affect long-term population equilibrium and regional sustainability in destination areas. Drawing on two waves of the China General Social Survey (CGSS), this study investigates the mechanisms through which social integration shapes migrants' fertility intentions. A particular focus is placed on the mediating role of perceived fairness. Using a long-difference model supplemented by heterogeneity analyses and mechanism tests, multiple pathways are identified that link social integration to migrants' fertility intentions. The findings reveal that: (1) Social integration tends to suppress migrants' fertility intentions, but perceived fairness partially buffers this effect and reshapes the decision logic. (2) Heterogeneity analyses show that new-generation migrant workers exhibit higher fertility intention as social integration rises, a finding consistent with a strategic pursuit of urban identity via childbearing. Meanwhile, social integration has a homogeneously suppressive effect among migrants across educational groups and among those with rural Hukou. (3) During periods of fertility-policy relaxation, lagging support services failed to translate into institutional trust, which in turn weakened policy effectiveness. Based on these distinct pathways, this study proposes multi-level policy recommendations, offering insights and suggestions for migrant-dense, ageing-before-affluent developing countries.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48067,"journal":{"name":"Population Space and Place","volume":"32 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Space and Place","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp.70247","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In addition to developed nations, the challenges of population ageing and declining fertility have also intensified in populous East Asian regions, prominently represented by China. Migrants serve as a critical urban labour resource in these countries and territories, and their fertility intentions directly affect long-term population equilibrium and regional sustainability in destination areas. Drawing on two waves of the China General Social Survey (CGSS), this study investigates the mechanisms through which social integration shapes migrants' fertility intentions. A particular focus is placed on the mediating role of perceived fairness. Using a long-difference model supplemented by heterogeneity analyses and mechanism tests, multiple pathways are identified that link social integration to migrants' fertility intentions. The findings reveal that: (1) Social integration tends to suppress migrants' fertility intentions, but perceived fairness partially buffers this effect and reshapes the decision logic. (2) Heterogeneity analyses show that new-generation migrant workers exhibit higher fertility intention as social integration rises, a finding consistent with a strategic pursuit of urban identity via childbearing. Meanwhile, social integration has a homogeneously suppressive effect among migrants across educational groups and among those with rural Hukou. (3) During periods of fertility-policy relaxation, lagging support services failed to translate into institutional trust, which in turn weakened policy effectiveness. Based on these distinct pathways, this study proposes multi-level policy recommendations, offering insights and suggestions for migrant-dense, ageing-before-affluent developing countries.

社会融合对流动人口生育意愿的影响:来自中国的证据
除发达国家外,以中国为代表的人口众多的东亚地区也面临着人口老龄化和生育率下降的挑战。移民是这些国家和地区重要的城市劳动力资源,他们的生育意愿直接影响目的地地区的长期人口平衡和区域可持续性。本研究利用中国综合社会调查(CGSS)的两波数据,探讨了社会整合对流动人口生育意愿的影响机制。特别关注的是感知公平的中介作用。利用长差模型,辅以异质性分析和机制检验,确定了社会融合与移民生育意愿之间的多种联系途径。研究发现:(1)社会融合倾向于抑制流动人口的生育意愿,但感知公平在一定程度上缓冲了这种影响,并重塑了决策逻辑。(2)异质性分析表明,随着社会融合程度的提高,新生代农民工的生育意愿更高,这与他们通过生育实现城市身份认同的战略追求相一致。同时,社会融合对不同教育群体和农村户口的流动人口具有同质性的抑制作用。(3)在生育政策放松期间,滞后的支持服务未能转化为制度信任,从而削弱了政策的有效性。基于这些不同的路径,本研究提出了多层次的政策建议,为移民密集、先老龄化后富裕的发展中国家提供了见解和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Population, Space and Place aims to be the leading English-language research journal in the field of geographical population studies. It intends to: - Inform population researchers of the best theoretical and empirical research on topics related to population, space and place - Promote and further enhance the international standing of population research through the exchange of views on what constitutes best research practice - Facilitate debate on issues of policy relevance and encourage the widest possible discussion and dissemination of the applications of research on populations - Review and evaluate the significance of recent research findings and provide an international platform where researchers can discuss the future course of population research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书