One Does Not Simply Walk Into Artificial Intelligence: A Distributed Leadership Framework for Healthcare Simulation.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Federico Lorenzo Barra, Laleh Jalilian, Alessandro Costa, Laura Leuci, Giovanna Rodella, Luca Carenzo
{"title":"One Does Not Simply Walk Into Artificial Intelligence: A Distributed Leadership Framework for Healthcare Simulation.","authors":"Federico Lorenzo Barra, Laleh Jalilian, Alessandro Costa, Laura Leuci, Giovanna Rodella, Luca Carenzo","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence is entering healthcare simulation, yet implementation remains fragmented and lacking coordinated governance. This article argues that sustainable AI integration requires moving beyond tool-centric experimentation toward an ecosystem-level approach connecting governance, infrastructure, pedagogy, and evaluation. We propose a Fellowship model, drawing on Tolkien's literary framework to illustrate how distributed leadership can align strategic, clinical, technical, operational, and learner perspectives. The Fellowship metaphor captures how trust must be built across historically separate groups, how leadership emerges situationally rather than hierarchically, and how those closest to the work prove essential to success. Simulation centers, with their controlled environments and established debriefing cultures, offer natural testbeds for AI implementation. We translate these principles into practical recommendations: anchoring decisions to educational problems, embedding psychological safety in planning, conducting multidimensional evaluation, and establishing continuous governance while ensuring ethical imperatives remain foundational rather than retrofitted. This framework offers guidance relevant to educators seeking pedagogical alignment, administrators developing governance structures, clinicians ensuring clinical authenticity, operations staff validating workflow integration, and learners advocating for meaningful participation in AI implementations.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000933","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is entering healthcare simulation, yet implementation remains fragmented and lacking coordinated governance. This article argues that sustainable AI integration requires moving beyond tool-centric experimentation toward an ecosystem-level approach connecting governance, infrastructure, pedagogy, and evaluation. We propose a Fellowship model, drawing on Tolkien's literary framework to illustrate how distributed leadership can align strategic, clinical, technical, operational, and learner perspectives. The Fellowship metaphor captures how trust must be built across historically separate groups, how leadership emerges situationally rather than hierarchically, and how those closest to the work prove essential to success. Simulation centers, with their controlled environments and established debriefing cultures, offer natural testbeds for AI implementation. We translate these principles into practical recommendations: anchoring decisions to educational problems, embedding psychological safety in planning, conducting multidimensional evaluation, and establishing continuous governance while ensuring ethical imperatives remain foundational rather than retrofitted. This framework offers guidance relevant to educators seeking pedagogical alignment, administrators developing governance structures, clinicians ensuring clinical authenticity, operations staff validating workflow integration, and learners advocating for meaningful participation in AI implementations.

一个人不能简单地走进人工智能:医疗保健模拟的分布式领导框架。
人工智能正在进入医疗保健模拟领域,但其实施仍然是碎片化的,缺乏协调的治理。本文认为,可持续的人工智能集成需要超越以工具为中心的实验,转向连接治理、基础设施、教学法和评估的生态系统级方法。我们以托尔金的文学框架为基础,提出了一个伙伴关系模型,以说明分布式领导如何将战略、临床、技术、运营和学习者的观点结合起来。“团契”这个比喻抓住了在历史上彼此分离的群体之间必须如何建立信任,领导力是如何根据情况而不是等级制度出现的,以及最接近工作的人如何证明对成功至关重要。模拟中心拥有可控的环境和既定的汇报文化,为人工智能的实现提供了天然的测试平台。我们将这些原则转化为实际的建议:将决策锚定在教育问题上,在规划中嵌入心理安全,进行多维评估,建立持续的治理,同时确保道德要求仍然是基础而不是改造。该框架为寻求教学一致性的教育工作者、开发治理结构的管理人员、确保临床真实性的临床医生、验证工作流集成的操作人员以及倡导有意义地参与人工智能实施的学习者提供了相关指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书