Diagnostic techniques for demodicosis: a systematic review.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Patricia Bodas Gallego, Héctor Perandones González
{"title":"Diagnostic techniques for demodicosis: a systematic review.","authors":"Patricia Bodas Gallego, Héctor Perandones González","doi":"10.23736/S2784-8671.25.08341-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Demodicosis comprises a spectrum of cutaneous conditions resulting from the overproliferation of Demodex mites. Multiple diagnostic techniques are available, although diagnosis can be challenging due to the presence of these mites as commensals in healthy individuals. Thus, the objective of this review is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of methods used for the diagnosis of demodicosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search was conducted on articles published between 2000 and 2025, using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Dialnet to identify studies on diagnostic methods for cutaneous demodicosis. Of the 1765 records screened, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria, focusing on diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3 cross-sectional, 8 prospective, 3 retrospective, 2 case-control studies and 2 controlled clinical trials have been included. These studies evaluated the diagnostic performance of standardized skin surface biopsy, direct microscopic examination, dermoscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy and molecular techniques in a combined population of 2187 patients. Direct microscopic examination and dermoscopy have been the most frequently used techniques in the enrolled studies. Among the genetic techniques, next-generation sequencing and polymerase chain reaction have been assessed. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review dealing with diagnostic methods for demodicosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Due to the heterogeneity of the included studies, identifying an optimal diagnostic method remains challenging. Therefore, diagnostic approaches should be selected according to clinical context and resource availability.</p>","PeriodicalId":14526,"journal":{"name":"Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology","volume":" ","pages":"197-209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2784-8671.25.08341-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Demodicosis comprises a spectrum of cutaneous conditions resulting from the overproliferation of Demodex mites. Multiple diagnostic techniques are available, although diagnosis can be challenging due to the presence of these mites as commensals in healthy individuals. Thus, the objective of this review is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of methods used for the diagnosis of demodicosis.

Methods: A search was conducted on articles published between 2000 and 2025, using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Dialnet to identify studies on diagnostic methods for cutaneous demodicosis. Of the 1765 records screened, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria, focusing on diagnostic accuracy.

Results: A total of 3 cross-sectional, 8 prospective, 3 retrospective, 2 case-control studies and 2 controlled clinical trials have been included. These studies evaluated the diagnostic performance of standardized skin surface biopsy, direct microscopic examination, dermoscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy and molecular techniques in a combined population of 2187 patients. Direct microscopic examination and dermoscopy have been the most frequently used techniques in the enrolled studies. Among the genetic techniques, next-generation sequencing and polymerase chain reaction have been assessed. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review dealing with diagnostic methods for demodicosis.

Conclusions: Due to the heterogeneity of the included studies, identifying an optimal diagnostic method remains challenging. Therefore, diagnostic approaches should be selected according to clinical context and resource availability.

蠕虫病的诊断技术:系统综述。
蠕形螨病包括由蠕形螨过度增殖引起的一系列皮肤状况。多种诊断技术是可用的,尽管诊断可能是具有挑战性的,由于这些螨虫的存在,在健康个体的共生。因此,本综述的目的是评估用于诊断蠕虫病的方法的诊断性能。证据获取:检索2000年至2025年间发表的文章,使用PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane Library和Dialnet来确定皮肤蠕虫病诊断方法的研究。在筛选的1765份记录中,18项研究符合纳入标准,重点是诊断准确性。证据综合:共纳入3项横断面研究、8项前瞻性研究、3项回顾性研究、2项病例对照研究和2项对照临床试验。这些研究评估了标准化皮肤表面活检、直接显微镜检查、皮肤镜检查、反射共聚焦显微镜和分子技术在2187例患者中的诊断性能。直接显微镜检查和皮肤镜检查是入组研究中最常用的技术。在遗传技术中,下一代测序和聚合酶链反应已被评估。据我们所知,这是第一个系统的回顾处理诊断方法的demococcus。结论:由于纳入研究的异质性,确定最佳诊断方法仍然具有挑战性。因此,诊断方法的选择应根据临床情况和资源的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
442
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书