Measuring dementia caregiving styles to improve person-centered care.

IF 6.2 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2026-01-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igag006
Amanda N Leggett, Jin-Shei Lai, Sophia Tsuker, Jennifer A Miner, Jonathan Troost, Noelle E Carlozzi
{"title":"Measuring dementia caregiving styles to improve person-centered care.","authors":"Amanda N Leggett, Jin-Shei Lai, Sophia Tsuker, Jennifer A Miner, Jonathan Troost, Noelle E Carlozzi","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igag006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Approaches to caregiving interventions are often \"one-size-fits-all,\" yet family caregivers for individuals with dementia have unique caregiving styles with which they enact daily care. This study describes the development of CG-STYLE, the first person-centered assessment of caregiving style.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Development phases of this measure included mixed-methods exploratory research, iterative item development and refinement, cognitive interviews, expert review, literacy and translatability review, and field testing of the items in 209 family/friend caregivers for an individual with dementia. Item response theory and classical test theory analyses were run.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Confirmatory factor analysis affirms the unidimensionality of 7 item banks of the measure: orientation toward the care partner, adaptability, understanding of dementia, emotional expression (positive, negative), and behavioral management (adaptive, maladaptive).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>A person-centered assessment measure can help tailor services and interventions to best fit unique styles of care, ultimately improving the well-being of the caregiver and the quality of care for the individual with dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"10 5","pages":"igag006"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13069935/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igag006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Approaches to caregiving interventions are often "one-size-fits-all," yet family caregivers for individuals with dementia have unique caregiving styles with which they enact daily care. This study describes the development of CG-STYLE, the first person-centered assessment of caregiving style.

Research design and methods: Development phases of this measure included mixed-methods exploratory research, iterative item development and refinement, cognitive interviews, expert review, literacy and translatability review, and field testing of the items in 209 family/friend caregivers for an individual with dementia. Item response theory and classical test theory analyses were run.

Results: Confirmatory factor analysis affirms the unidimensionality of 7 item banks of the measure: orientation toward the care partner, adaptability, understanding of dementia, emotional expression (positive, negative), and behavioral management (adaptive, maladaptive).

Discussion and implications: A person-centered assessment measure can help tailor services and interventions to best fit unique styles of care, ultimately improving the well-being of the caregiver and the quality of care for the individual with dementia.

测量痴呆症护理方式以改善以人为本的护理。
背景和目的:护理干预的方法往往是“一刀切”的,然而,痴呆症患者的家庭护理人员有其独特的护理风格,以实施日常护理。本研究描述CG-STYLE的发展,这是第一个以人为本的照护风格评估。研究设计和方法:该量表的开发阶段包括混合方法探索性研究、迭代项目开发和改进、认知访谈、专家评审、识字和可翻译性评审,以及在209名痴呆症患者的家人/朋友照顾者中对项目进行现场测试。运用项目反应理论和经典测试理论进行分析。结果:验证性因子分析证实了量表的7个分项库的单维度性:对照顾伙伴的取向、适应性、对痴呆的理解、情绪表达(积极、消极)和行为管理(适应、不适应)。讨论和启示:以人为本的评估措施可以帮助量身定制服务和干预措施,以最适合独特的护理风格,最终改善护理者的福祉和对痴呆症患者的护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书