Knowledge transfer comes of ‘age’: Key themes and directions for future research

IF 3.5 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Ulrike Fasbender
{"title":"Knowledge transfer comes of ‘age’: Key themes and directions for future research","authors":"Ulrike Fasbender","doi":"10.1111/joop.70111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As workforces age, understanding how knowledge flows between younger and older employees has become a central concern in organizations. This reflective commentary synthesizes the development of research on age and knowledge transfer since the seminal contribution by Burmeister et al. (<i>Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology</i> 2018, 91, 518). Moving beyond age as a control variable, the literature conceptualizes knowledge transfer as a structured, relational and context-dependent process shaped by age-based norms, motivation and identities. I summarize key themes that have emerged in the field, including multi-level antecedents and expanding consequences ranging from employability and successful aging at work to organizational performance. The commentary highlights methodological advances, including dyadic designs, field experiments and multi-level studies, while identifying persistent conceptual blind spots. Building on these insights, seven directions for future research are proposed as follows: (1) emphasizing age as a continuous and multifaceted construct, (2) exploring emotions as central mechanisms, (3) differentiating knowledge types and behaviours, (4) capturing micro-dynamics and temporal fluctuations, (5) broadening the outcome scope, (6) digitization and (7) methodological pluralism. By integrating lifespan and knowledge transfer perspectives, this commentary argues that knowledge transfer across the lifespan and between different age groups constitutes a critical vehicle for sustaining both organizational effectiveness and meaningful working lives.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"99 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joop.70111","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.70111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As workforces age, understanding how knowledge flows between younger and older employees has become a central concern in organizations. This reflective commentary synthesizes the development of research on age and knowledge transfer since the seminal contribution by Burmeister et al. (Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 2018, 91, 518). Moving beyond age as a control variable, the literature conceptualizes knowledge transfer as a structured, relational and context-dependent process shaped by age-based norms, motivation and identities. I summarize key themes that have emerged in the field, including multi-level antecedents and expanding consequences ranging from employability and successful aging at work to organizational performance. The commentary highlights methodological advances, including dyadic designs, field experiments and multi-level studies, while identifying persistent conceptual blind spots. Building on these insights, seven directions for future research are proposed as follows: (1) emphasizing age as a continuous and multifaceted construct, (2) exploring emotions as central mechanisms, (3) differentiating knowledge types and behaviours, (4) capturing micro-dynamics and temporal fluctuations, (5) broadening the outcome scope, (6) digitization and (7) methodological pluralism. By integrating lifespan and knowledge transfer perspectives, this commentary argues that knowledge transfer across the lifespan and between different age groups constitutes a critical vehicle for sustaining both organizational effectiveness and meaningful working lives.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

知识转移来自“年龄”:未来研究的关键主题和方向
随着员工年龄的增长,了解知识如何在年轻员工和年长员工之间流动已成为组织关注的中心问题。这篇反思性评论综合了自Burmeister等人的开创性贡献以来年龄和知识转移研究的发展(Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2018, 91, 518)。除了将年龄作为控制变量之外,文献将知识转移概念化为一个结构化的、关系的和依赖于情境的过程,该过程由基于年龄的规范、动机和身份形成。我总结了该领域出现的关键主题,包括多层次的前因和扩展的后果,从就业能力和工作中的成功老龄化到组织绩效。该评论强调了方法论的进步,包括二元设计、实地实验和多层次研究,同时指出了持续存在的概念盲点。在此基础上,提出了未来研究的七个方向:(1)强调年龄是一个连续的、多方面的结构;(2)探索情感作为中心机制;(3)区分知识类型和行为;(4)捕捉微观动力学和时间波动;(5)扩大结果范围;(6)数字化;(7)方法多元化。通过整合生命周期和知识转移的观点,这篇评论认为,跨越生命周期和不同年龄组之间的知识转移是维持组织有效性和有意义的工作生活的关键手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology aims to increase understanding of people and organisations at work including: - industrial, organizational, work, vocational and personnel psychology - behavioural and cognitive aspects of industrial relations - ergonomics and human factors Innovative or interdisciplinary approaches with a psychological emphasis are particularly welcome. So are papers which develop the links between occupational/organisational psychology and other areas of the discipline, such as social and cognitive psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书