{"title":"Transfer-matrix analysis of Fibonacci quasi-periodic dielectric multilayers for broadband optical back-reflection","authors":"Coskun Firat","doi":"10.1016/j.ijleo.2026.172747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Thin-film optics and radiative-transfer applications, including rear reflectors for energy converters, depend heavily on optical coating design and broadband light control in layered dielectric materials. Using a 2-µm crystalline-silicon absorber, this study shows a methodical transfer-matrix analysis of quasi-periodic Fibonacci TiO<sub>2</sub>/SiO<sub>2</sub> multilayers as broadband back reflectors. Sellmeier parameterizations characterize material dispersion, while an analytical fit to tabulated optical data captures silicon absorption. At similar layer counts, Fibonacci stacks from generation orders 4–10 (5–89 layers) are compared against random multilayers and periodic quarter-wave distributed Bragg reflectors (DBRs). Under AM1.5<!--> <!-->G illumination, performance is assessed using a photon-flux-weighted reflectance metric together with the matching short-circuit current density <em>J</em><sub>sc</sub> from a planar two-pass absorption model. Quarter-wave thicknesses are <em>d</em><sub>A</sub>=57.6<!--> <!-->nm and <em>d</em><sub>B</sub>=102.9<!--> <!-->nm at a 600<!--> <!-->nm design wavelength. For 34 layers, the Gen-8 Fibonacci structure yields <em>J</em><sub>sc</sub>=22.50<!--> <!-->mA<!--> <!-->cm<sup>-2</sup>, representing a 17.4% increase over a no-reflector baseline and 92.3% of the ideal planar upper bound. While Fibonacci stacks have better broadband reflectance than DBRs (71.8% vs 60.2%), DBRs generate greater <em>J</em><sub>sc</sub> (24.04<!--> <!-->mA<!--> <!-->cm<sup>-2</sup>) because of their spectral alignment with strong silicon absorption, therefore emphasizing a spectral-selectivity trade-off. Optimizing design wavelength helps to close this difference; the Fibonacci structure achieves <em>J</em><sub>sc</sub>=23.70<!--> <!-->mA<!--> <!-->cm<sup>-2</sup> at λ<sub>0</sub>=475<!--> <!-->nm. Field-intensity profiles show clear light-trapping processes, and tolerance testing demonstrates resilience. Reported findings apply to TE polarisation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19513,"journal":{"name":"Optik","volume":"350 ","pages":"Article 172747"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optik","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030402626000835","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Thin-film optics and radiative-transfer applications, including rear reflectors for energy converters, depend heavily on optical coating design and broadband light control in layered dielectric materials. Using a 2-µm crystalline-silicon absorber, this study shows a methodical transfer-matrix analysis of quasi-periodic Fibonacci TiO2/SiO2 multilayers as broadband back reflectors. Sellmeier parameterizations characterize material dispersion, while an analytical fit to tabulated optical data captures silicon absorption. At similar layer counts, Fibonacci stacks from generation orders 4–10 (5–89 layers) are compared against random multilayers and periodic quarter-wave distributed Bragg reflectors (DBRs). Under AM1.5 G illumination, performance is assessed using a photon-flux-weighted reflectance metric together with the matching short-circuit current density Jsc from a planar two-pass absorption model. Quarter-wave thicknesses are dA=57.6 nm and dB=102.9 nm at a 600 nm design wavelength. For 34 layers, the Gen-8 Fibonacci structure yields Jsc=22.50 mA cm-2, representing a 17.4% increase over a no-reflector baseline and 92.3% of the ideal planar upper bound. While Fibonacci stacks have better broadband reflectance than DBRs (71.8% vs 60.2%), DBRs generate greater Jsc (24.04 mA cm-2) because of their spectral alignment with strong silicon absorption, therefore emphasizing a spectral-selectivity trade-off. Optimizing design wavelength helps to close this difference; the Fibonacci structure achieves Jsc=23.70 mA cm-2 at λ0=475 nm. Field-intensity profiles show clear light-trapping processes, and tolerance testing demonstrates resilience. Reported findings apply to TE polarisation.
薄膜光学和辐射传输应用,包括能量转换器的后反射器,在很大程度上取决于光学涂层设计和层状介电材料中的宽带光控制。使用2µm晶体硅吸收体,本研究对准周期Fibonacci TiO2/SiO2多层膜作为宽带后反射器进行了系统的传递矩阵分析。Sellmeier参数化表征材料色散,而对制表光学数据的分析拟合捕获硅吸收。在相似的层数下,将4-10代阶(5-89层)的斐波那契堆栈与随机多层和周期性四分之一波分布布拉格反射器(dbr)进行比较。在AM1.5 G照明下,使用光子通量加权反射率指标以及来自平面双通道吸收模型的匹配短路电流密度Jsc来评估性能。在600 nm设计波长下,四分之一波厚度dA=57.6 nm, dB=102.9 nm。对于34层,Gen-8斐波那契结构的Jsc=22.50 mA cm-2,比无反射基线增加17.4%,比理想平面上界增加92.3%。虽然Fibonacci叠片比dbr叠片具有更好的宽带反射率(71.8% vs 60.2%),但dbr叠片产生更大的Jsc (24.04 mA cm-2),因为它们的光谱排列与强硅吸收,因此强调了光谱选择性的权衡。优化设计波长有助于缩小这种差异;斐波那契结构在λ0=475 nm处达到Jsc=23.70 mA cm-2。场强曲线显示了清晰的光捕获过程,耐受性测试显示了弹性。报道的发现适用于TE极化。
期刊介绍:
Optik publishes articles on all subjects related to light and electron optics and offers a survey on the state of research and technical development within the following fields:
Optics:
-Optics design, geometrical and beam optics, wave optics-
Optical and micro-optical components, diffractive optics, devices and systems-
Photoelectric and optoelectronic devices-
Optical properties of materials, nonlinear optics, wave propagation and transmission in homogeneous and inhomogeneous materials-
Information optics, image formation and processing, holographic techniques, microscopes and spectrometer techniques, and image analysis-
Optical testing and measuring techniques-
Optical communication and computing-
Physiological optics-
As well as other related topics.