Beyond the black box: lessons in explainability from AI in mammography

IF 13.9 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Artificial Intelligence Review Pub Date : 2026-03-11 Epub Date: 2026-04-06 DOI:10.1007/s10462-026-11518-5
Andrea Ciardiello, Anna D’Angelo, Luigi De Angelis, Stefano Giagu, Evis Sala, Guido Gigante
{"title":"Beyond the black box: lessons in explainability from AI in mammography","authors":"Andrea Ciardiello,&nbsp;Anna D’Angelo,&nbsp;Luigi De Angelis,&nbsp;Stefano Giagu,&nbsp;Evis Sala,&nbsp;Guido Gigante","doi":"10.1007/s10462-026-11518-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With AI already in clinical use, mammography serves as a critical test-bed for the challenges and potential of medical AI. However, its progress is hampered by the ‘black box’ nature of current AI algorithms, limiting clinician trust and transparency. This review analyses the field of Explainable AI (XAI) as a solution, examining its motivations, methods, and metrics. We find the field is dominated by post-hoc saliency methods that provide plausible but not necessarily faithful explanations of AI decision-making. This focus has led to an evaluation gap, where localization accuracy is used as a proxy for explanatory quality without verifying the model’s true reasoning. Inherently interpretable models that could offer more faithful insights are rarely implemented, and a lack of human-centred studies further obscures the clinical utility of current XAI techniques. We argue that for AI in mammography to realize its full potential, the field must urgently shift focus from creating plausible explanations to developing and validating inherently interpretable systems that provide faithful, clinically meaningful insights.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"59 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-026-11518-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-026-11518-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With AI already in clinical use, mammography serves as a critical test-bed for the challenges and potential of medical AI. However, its progress is hampered by the ‘black box’ nature of current AI algorithms, limiting clinician trust and transparency. This review analyses the field of Explainable AI (XAI) as a solution, examining its motivations, methods, and metrics. We find the field is dominated by post-hoc saliency methods that provide plausible but not necessarily faithful explanations of AI decision-making. This focus has led to an evaluation gap, where localization accuracy is used as a proxy for explanatory quality without verifying the model’s true reasoning. Inherently interpretable models that could offer more faithful insights are rarely implemented, and a lack of human-centred studies further obscures the clinical utility of current XAI techniques. We argue that for AI in mammography to realize its full potential, the field must urgently shift focus from creating plausible explanations to developing and validating inherently interpretable systems that provide faithful, clinically meaningful insights.

Abstract Image

黑箱之外:人工智能在乳房x光检查中的可解释性教训
随着人工智能已经进入临床应用,乳房x光检查可以作为医疗人工智能挑战和潜力的关键测试平台。然而,它的进展受到当前人工智能算法的“黑箱”性质的阻碍,限制了临床医生的信任和透明度。本文分析了可解释人工智能(XAI)作为解决方案的领域,考察了其动机、方法和指标。我们发现该领域被事后显著性方法所主导,这些方法为人工智能决策提供了看似合理但不一定忠实的解释。这种关注导致了评估差距,其中定位精度被用作解释质量的代理,而没有验证模型的真实推理。能够提供更可靠见解的固有可解释模型很少得到实施,并且缺乏以人为中心的研究进一步模糊了当前XAI技术的临床应用。我们认为,为了让人工智能在乳房x线照相术中充分发挥其潜力,该领域必须立即将重点从创造合理的解释转向开发和验证内在可解释的系统,以提供忠实的、有临床意义的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书