Between guidelines and reality: expert neurologists' perspectives on structural resources for ALS care in Germany.

IF 4 Q2 Medicine
Katharina Linse, Dorothée Lulé, Florian Schöberl, Peter Reilich, Benjamin Ilse, Moritz Metelmann, Clemens Eickhoff, Sarah Bublitz, Stefan Lorenzl, Matthias Boentert, Susanne Petri, Annekathrin Rödiger, Uta Smesny, Joachim Wolf, Ute Weyen, Daniel Zeller, Johannes Dorst, André Maier, Thomas Meyer, Paul Lingor, Andreas Hermann, Martin Regensburger, Julian Großkreutz, Clemens Runge, Hanna Sophie Lapp, Maren Freigang, Maximilian Vidovic, Elisa Aust, Constanze Weber, René Günther
{"title":"Between guidelines and reality: expert neurologists' perspectives on structural resources for ALS care in Germany.","authors":"Katharina Linse, Dorothée Lulé, Florian Schöberl, Peter Reilich, Benjamin Ilse, Moritz Metelmann, Clemens Eickhoff, Sarah Bublitz, Stefan Lorenzl, Matthias Boentert, Susanne Petri, Annekathrin Rödiger, Uta Smesny, Joachim Wolf, Ute Weyen, Daniel Zeller, Johannes Dorst, André Maier, Thomas Meyer, Paul Lingor, Andreas Hermann, Martin Regensburger, Julian Großkreutz, Clemens Runge, Hanna Sophie Lapp, Maren Freigang, Maximilian Vidovic, Elisa Aust, Constanze Weber, René Günther","doi":"10.1186/s42466-026-00481-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal motor neuron disease, leading to an inexorable decline in voluntary muscle function, and finally to death within 2–4 years. The provision of professional ALS care is a multifaceted and continually evolving challenge, including the management of symptoms, advanced care planning, and the provision of psychosocial support. The core objective is to minimize suffering by optimizing symptom management and preserving quality of life. European and German guidelines recommend a specialized, multidisciplinary, and multiprofessional team, including collaborations with palliative care providers. While this is a validated approach to ensure optimal care and patient satisfaction, real-world experience suggests that the German healthcare system may not fully meet these requirements. METHODS: This study assessed resources of specialized ALS centres in Germany, focusing on the structural prerequisites for the provision of multidimensional care and collaboration with specialised palliative care (SPC) providers. A mixed methods design was used, comprising remote video interviews with neurologists specialized in ALS, including standardised questions and an open section. RESULTS: Sixteen neurologists representing their ALS centres were interviewed. The findings indicated a substantial discrepancy in the allocation of time and personnel resources among the centres. The majority of interviewees regarded resources to be inadequate and reported deficiencies in multidisciplinarity and networking. Consequently, certain components of ALS care - particularly psychosocial concerns - have been documented as being occasionally disregarded due to limitations in time or human resources. A number of interviewees expressed criticism regarding the inadequate access to and suboptimal collaboration with SPC providers. The compensation for patient care and interprofessional communication was not perceived as cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that limited resources may prevent the provision of guideline-based care for people living with ALS and their families, even in specialized outpatient clinics. To facilitate the delivery of comprehensive care by ALS centers throughout the entire disease course, the establishment of operational standards concerning their multi-professional staffing and adequate compensation is imperative. Further research is needed to develop feasible concepts of how specialized neurological palliative care can be made reliably accessible to all patients in need. </p>","PeriodicalId":94156,"journal":{"name":"Neurological research and practice","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13063594/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-026-00481-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal motor neuron disease, leading to an inexorable decline in voluntary muscle function, and finally to death within 2–4 years. The provision of professional ALS care is a multifaceted and continually evolving challenge, including the management of symptoms, advanced care planning, and the provision of psychosocial support. The core objective is to minimize suffering by optimizing symptom management and preserving quality of life. European and German guidelines recommend a specialized, multidisciplinary, and multiprofessional team, including collaborations with palliative care providers. While this is a validated approach to ensure optimal care and patient satisfaction, real-world experience suggests that the German healthcare system may not fully meet these requirements. METHODS: This study assessed resources of specialized ALS centres in Germany, focusing on the structural prerequisites for the provision of multidimensional care and collaboration with specialised palliative care (SPC) providers. A mixed methods design was used, comprising remote video interviews with neurologists specialized in ALS, including standardised questions and an open section. RESULTS: Sixteen neurologists representing their ALS centres were interviewed. The findings indicated a substantial discrepancy in the allocation of time and personnel resources among the centres. The majority of interviewees regarded resources to be inadequate and reported deficiencies in multidisciplinarity and networking. Consequently, certain components of ALS care - particularly psychosocial concerns - have been documented as being occasionally disregarded due to limitations in time or human resources. A number of interviewees expressed criticism regarding the inadequate access to and suboptimal collaboration with SPC providers. The compensation for patient care and interprofessional communication was not perceived as cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that limited resources may prevent the provision of guideline-based care for people living with ALS and their families, even in specialized outpatient clinics. To facilitate the delivery of comprehensive care by ALS centers throughout the entire disease course, the establishment of operational standards concerning their multi-professional staffing and adequate compensation is imperative. Further research is needed to develop feasible concepts of how specialized neurological palliative care can be made reliably accessible to all patients in need.

在指南和现实之间:专家神经学家对德国ALS护理结构资源的看法。
背景:肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)是一种致命的运动神经元疾病,导致随意肌功能不可避免地下降,最终在2-4年内死亡。提供专业的ALS护理是一项多方面和不断发展的挑战,包括症状管理、高级护理计划和提供社会心理支持。核心目标是通过优化症状管理和保持生活质量来减少痛苦。欧洲和德国的指南建议建立一个专门的、多学科的、多专业的团队,包括与姑息治疗提供者合作。虽然这是一种确保最佳护理和患者满意度的有效方法,但现实世界的经验表明,德国医疗保健系统可能无法完全满足这些要求。方法:本研究评估了德国专业ALS中心的资源,重点关注提供多维护理和与专业姑息治疗(SPC)提供者合作的结构性先决条件。采用混合方法设计,包括与专门研究ALS的神经学家进行远程视频访谈,包括标准化问题和开放部分。结果:采访了代表ALS中心的16名神经科医生。调查结果表明,各中心在分配时间和人力资源方面存在很大差异。大多数受访者认为资源不足,并报告在多学科和联网方面存在缺陷。因此,有记录表明,由于时间或人力资源的限制,ALS护理的某些组成部分,特别是社会心理方面的关注,偶尔会被忽视。许多受访者对SPC供应商的不足和不理想的合作表示了批评。对病人护理和专业间沟通的补偿被认为不具有成本效益。结论:我们的研究结果表明,有限的资源可能会阻碍为ALS患者及其家人提供基于指南的护理,即使是在专门的门诊诊所。为了促进ALS中心在整个疾病过程中提供全面的护理,建立有关其多专业人员配备和适当补偿的操作标准是必不可少的。需要进一步研究,以制定可行的概念,使所有有需要的患者都能可靠地获得专门的神经姑息治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书