Designing with Generative AI: Symbiosis, Authorship, and the Evolving Image

IF 1.4 2区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Morteza Abdipour
{"title":"Designing with Generative AI: Symbiosis, Authorship, and the Evolving Image","authors":"Morteza Abdipour","doi":"10.1016/j.sheji.2026.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article explores how generative AI reshapes authorship, presence, and meaning in design. To situate this shift, it compares today’s disruption with photography’s nineteenth-century challenge to painting, when automation displaced documentation and creativity shifted toward perception and subjectivity. A similar redistribution occurs today: as generative systems automate craft, creativity is reconfigured toward prompting, iteration, and negotiation. The article advances three conceptual contributions. First, the symbiosis–agency–meaning-making triangle offers a heuristic for analyzing how authorship unfolds in human–system interaction. Second, the concept of interactional literacy names the competences required to navigate co-adaptive AI systems, extending debates on design and AI literacy toward practices of negotiation and reflection. Third, aura is reframed through three models—prompt aura, interactional aura, and algorithmic signature—translating Walter Benjamin’s contested concept into design-relevant dimensions and showing how presence emerges as resonance layered across prompts, processes, and system tendencies. Together, these frameworks highlight that authorship is redistributed through negotiation and response; that aura is reconfigured as a relational presence built across iterative layers; and that literacy emerges not as mastery but as dialogue. For design research, the task is to develop systems, practices, and pedagogies that sustain authorship as accountable, plural, and open to critique in the age of generative AI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37146,"journal":{"name":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","volume":"12 1","pages":"Pages 85-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872626000043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores how generative AI reshapes authorship, presence, and meaning in design. To situate this shift, it compares today’s disruption with photography’s nineteenth-century challenge to painting, when automation displaced documentation and creativity shifted toward perception and subjectivity. A similar redistribution occurs today: as generative systems automate craft, creativity is reconfigured toward prompting, iteration, and negotiation. The article advances three conceptual contributions. First, the symbiosis–agency–meaning-making triangle offers a heuristic for analyzing how authorship unfolds in human–system interaction. Second, the concept of interactional literacy names the competences required to navigate co-adaptive AI systems, extending debates on design and AI literacy toward practices of negotiation and reflection. Third, aura is reframed through three models—prompt aura, interactional aura, and algorithmic signature—translating Walter Benjamin’s contested concept into design-relevant dimensions and showing how presence emerges as resonance layered across prompts, processes, and system tendencies. Together, these frameworks highlight that authorship is redistributed through negotiation and response; that aura is reconfigured as a relational presence built across iterative layers; and that literacy emerges not as mastery but as dialogue. For design research, the task is to develop systems, practices, and pedagogies that sustain authorship as accountable, plural, and open to critique in the age of generative AI.
生成式人工智能设计:共生、作者身份和不断发展的形象
本文探讨了生成式人工智能如何重塑设计中的作者身份、存在和意义。为了定位这种转变,它将今天的破坏与19世纪摄影对绘画的挑战进行了比较,当时自动化取代了记录,创造力转向感知和主观性。类似的再分配也发生在今天:随着生成系统自动化工艺,创造力被重新配置为提示、迭代和协商。本文提出了三个概念性贡献。首先,共生-代理-意义生成三角关系为分析作者身份如何在人类系统互动中展开提供了启发。其次,互动素养的概念命名了导航协同适应人工智能系统所需的能力,将关于设计和人工智能素养的辩论扩展到谈判和反思的实践。第三,通过三个模型——提示光环、互动光环和算法签名——重新构建光环,将沃尔特·本雅明有争议的概念转化为与设计相关的维度,并展示存在如何以共振的形式在提示、过程和系统趋势之间分层出现。这些框架共同强调,作者身份是通过协商和回应重新分配的;这种光环被重新配置为跨迭代层构建的关系存在;这种读写能力不是通过掌握而是通过对话出现的。对于设计研究,任务是开发系统、实践和教学法,以维持作者在生成式人工智能时代的负责任、多元和开放的批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书