Adaptation and Multi-Methods Validation of the Cultural Self-Efficacy Scale in Early Intervention (CSES-EI)

IF 4.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
James D. Lee, Veronica Y. Kang, Sean Joo, Adriana Kaori Terol, Sehee Jung, Yuanchen Kuo, Hedda Meadan
{"title":"Adaptation and Multi-Methods Validation of the Cultural Self-Efficacy Scale in Early Intervention (CSES-EI)","authors":"James D. Lee, Veronica Y. Kang, Sean Joo, Adriana Kaori Terol, Sehee Jung, Yuanchen Kuo, Hedda Meadan","doi":"10.1177/00144029261433795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely known that marginalized families of young children with disabilities have inequitable access to evidence-based practices within publicly funded systems of care, such as the Part C early intervention (EI) system. One factor contributing to this inequality is providers’ limited cultural self-efficacy, which can be defined as the confidence and competence to engage effectively with families from different cultural or linguistic backgrounds than their own. However, little is known about how to assess cultural self-efficacy specifically among EI providers. Therefore, this study aimed to adapt and validate the Cultural Self-Efficacy Scale in Early Intervention (CSES-EI), a scale to assess EI providers’ cultural self-efficacy when working with marginalized families. We used a modified Delphi method to adapt 32 items from an original scale into the CSES-EI. A total of 201 EI providers from diverse professional backgrounds completed the survey. Data analysis involved exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and multiple regression to assess the reliability, validity, and underlying structure of the scale. The CSES-EI demonstrated strong internal consistency (α = .91, ω = .94) and a three-factor structure accounting for 47.9% of the variance. Thematic analysis of open-ended responses revealed that EI providers emphasized family-centered coaching, cultural competence, and the need for flexibility when working with marginalized families. Findings underscore the importance of culturally responsive practices in EI and suggest that professional development targeting cultural efficacy is essential for improving service delivery with diverse populations. This validated tool provides a foundation for assessing and enhancing cultural self-efficacy among EI providers.","PeriodicalId":48164,"journal":{"name":"Exceptional Children","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptional Children","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029261433795","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is widely known that marginalized families of young children with disabilities have inequitable access to evidence-based practices within publicly funded systems of care, such as the Part C early intervention (EI) system. One factor contributing to this inequality is providers’ limited cultural self-efficacy, which can be defined as the confidence and competence to engage effectively with families from different cultural or linguistic backgrounds than their own. However, little is known about how to assess cultural self-efficacy specifically among EI providers. Therefore, this study aimed to adapt and validate the Cultural Self-Efficacy Scale in Early Intervention (CSES-EI), a scale to assess EI providers’ cultural self-efficacy when working with marginalized families. We used a modified Delphi method to adapt 32 items from an original scale into the CSES-EI. A total of 201 EI providers from diverse professional backgrounds completed the survey. Data analysis involved exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and multiple regression to assess the reliability, validity, and underlying structure of the scale. The CSES-EI demonstrated strong internal consistency (α = .91, ω = .94) and a three-factor structure accounting for 47.9% of the variance. Thematic analysis of open-ended responses revealed that EI providers emphasized family-centered coaching, cultural competence, and the need for flexibility when working with marginalized families. Findings underscore the importance of culturally responsive practices in EI and suggest that professional development targeting cultural efficacy is essential for improving service delivery with diverse populations. This validated tool provides a foundation for assessing and enhancing cultural self-efficacy among EI providers.
早期干预文化自我效能量表的适应与多方法验证
众所周知,被边缘化的残疾幼儿家庭在公共资助的护理系统(如C部分早期干预系统)中获得循证实践的机会不公平。造成这种不平等的一个因素是提供者有限的文化自我效能感,它可以被定义为与来自不同文化或语言背景的家庭有效接触的信心和能力。然而,对于如何评估EI提供者的文化自我效能感,我们知之甚少。因此,本研究旨在对早期干预文化自我效能量表(ses -EI)进行调整和验证,该量表用于评估EI提供者在服务边缘家庭时的文化自我效能。我们采用改进的德尔菲法将原量表中的32个条目改编为cse - ei。来自不同专业背景的201名EI提供者完成了调查。数据分析采用探索性因子分析(EFA)、验证性因子分析(CFA)和多元回归来评估量表的信度、效度和基础结构。CSES-EI具有较强的内部一致性(α = 0.91, ω = 0.94),三因素结构占方差的47.9%。开放式回答的主题分析显示,EI提供者强调以家庭为中心的指导、文化能力以及在与边缘化家庭合作时需要灵活性。研究结果强调了文化响应实践在EI中的重要性,并建议以文化效能为目标的专业发展对于改善面向不同人群的服务提供至关重要。这个经过验证的工具为评估和增强EI提供者的文化自我效能提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Exceptional Children, an official journal of The Council for Exceptional Children, publishes original research and analyses that focus on the education and development of exceptional infants, toddlers, children, youth, and adults. This includes descriptions of research, research reviews, methodological reviews of the literature, data-based position papers, policy analyses, and registered reports. Exceptional Children publishes quantitative, qualitative, and single-subject design studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书