I believe I can handle it! Trauma coping self-efficacy and posttraumatic stress symptoms among police officers: A 1-year longitudinal study.

IF 3.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Sara R Møller,Lars L Andersen,Nina B Hansen,Ask Elklit,Jesper Pihl-Thingvad
{"title":"I believe I can handle it! Trauma coping self-efficacy and posttraumatic stress symptoms among police officers: A 1-year longitudinal study.","authors":"Sara R Møller,Lars L Andersen,Nina B Hansen,Ask Elklit,Jesper Pihl-Thingvad","doi":"10.1037/ocp0000430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Police officers are repeatedly exposed to critical incidents, making them vulnerable to posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) during service and posttraumatic stress disorder. Trauma-related coping self-efficacy (CSE) has been identified as a protective factor in posttraumatic recovery, yet little is known about its role in high-risk occupations. This study integrates the CSE framework into the cumulative burden model and examines longitudinal associations of CSE and accumulated critical incident history (CIH) with PTSS 1 year later in 2,954 police officers, while adjusting for multiple individual and organizational risk factors. The study also examines whether CIH modifies the CSE-PTSS association. Results showed that CSE was inversely associated, and CIH positively associated, with later PTSS. A small yet significant CIH × CSE interaction was found and stratified analyses indicated stronger CSE-PTSS associations at higher levels of CIH. Notably, post hoc analyses also showed lower mean CSE among officers with the highest CIH, indicating a potentially concerning pattern between cumulative exposure and strained CSE beliefs. The study provides novel etiological insights into the interplay of CSE as a protective factor and CIH as an occupational risk, underscoring their value in organizational prevention. Given the modest effect size, the interaction warrants cautious interpretation, although main findings remained consistent across sensitivity analyses, including models accounting for exposure during the 1-year follow up. Future research is needed to clarify the mechanisms linking critical incident exposure, CSE, and PTSS, and to identify factors that strengthen CSE in policing and other high-risk occupations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":48339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000430","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Police officers are repeatedly exposed to critical incidents, making them vulnerable to posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) during service and posttraumatic stress disorder. Trauma-related coping self-efficacy (CSE) has been identified as a protective factor in posttraumatic recovery, yet little is known about its role in high-risk occupations. This study integrates the CSE framework into the cumulative burden model and examines longitudinal associations of CSE and accumulated critical incident history (CIH) with PTSS 1 year later in 2,954 police officers, while adjusting for multiple individual and organizational risk factors. The study also examines whether CIH modifies the CSE-PTSS association. Results showed that CSE was inversely associated, and CIH positively associated, with later PTSS. A small yet significant CIH × CSE interaction was found and stratified analyses indicated stronger CSE-PTSS associations at higher levels of CIH. Notably, post hoc analyses also showed lower mean CSE among officers with the highest CIH, indicating a potentially concerning pattern between cumulative exposure and strained CSE beliefs. The study provides novel etiological insights into the interplay of CSE as a protective factor and CIH as an occupational risk, underscoring their value in organizational prevention. Given the modest effect size, the interaction warrants cautious interpretation, although main findings remained consistent across sensitivity analyses, including models accounting for exposure during the 1-year follow up. Future research is needed to clarify the mechanisms linking critical incident exposure, CSE, and PTSS, and to identify factors that strengthen CSE in policing and other high-risk occupations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
我相信我能行!警察创伤应对自我效能与创伤后应激症状:一项为期一年的纵向研究。
警察经常接触重大事件,使他们在服役期间容易出现创伤后应激症状和创伤后应激障碍。创伤相关应对自我效能(CSE)已被确定为创伤后恢复的保护因素,但其在高危职业中的作用尚不清楚。本研究将CSE框架整合到累积负担模型中,并在调整多个个人和组织风险因素的同时,对2,954名警察进行了一年后的调查,考察了CSE和累积关键事件历史(CIH)与ptsd的纵向关联。该研究还探讨了CIH是否会改变CSE-PTSS的相关性。结果显示,CSE与后期PTSS呈负相关,CIH与后期PTSS呈正相关。发现CIH与CSE的相互作用虽小但显著,分层分析表明,CIH水平越高,CSE与ptss的相关性越强。值得注意的是,事后分析还显示,在CIH最高的军官中,平均CSE较低,表明累积暴露与紧张的CSE信念之间存在潜在的相关模式。该研究为CSE作为保护因素和CIH作为职业风险的相互作用提供了新的病因学见解,强调了它们在组织预防中的价值。考虑到适度的效应大小,相互作用需要谨慎的解释,尽管主要发现在敏感性分析中保持一致,包括考虑1年随访期间暴露的模型。未来的研究需要明确关键事件暴露、CSE和创伤后应激障碍之间的联系机制,并确定在警察和其他高风险职业中加强CSE的因素。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Occupational Health Psychology offers research, theory, and public policy articles in occupational health psychology, an interdisciplinary field representing a broad range of backgrounds, interests, and specializations. Occupational health psychology concerns the application of psychology to improving the quality of work life and to protecting and promoting the safety, health, and well-being of workers. This journal focuses on the work environment, the individual, and the work-family interface.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书